alphacentauri 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 testing with a LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2GB on Linuxmint 21 via the Phoronix Test Suite. linux-kernel-build-conf1-6c16g: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 2 x 240GB INTEL SSDSC2BW24, Graphics: NVIDIA NVC8 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC662 rev3, Monitor: HP L1950, Network: Intel 82579LM + Intel 82574L OS: Linuxmint 21, Kernel: 5.15.0-41-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 5.4.8, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 22.0.1, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 2x6c_2x16GdualCh: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2 x 240GB INTEL SSDSC2BW24, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC662 rev3, Monitor: DELL E198WFP, Network: Intel 82579LM + Intel 82574L OS: Linuxmint 21, Kernel: 5.15.0-56-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 5.4.12, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.157, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1440x900 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 @ 2.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO (A1KT46AUS BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2 x 240GB INTEL SSDSC2BW24, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC662 rev3, Monitor: DELL E198WFP, Network: Intel 82579LM + Intel 82574L OS: Linuxmint 21, Kernel: 5.15.0-56-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 5.4.12, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.157, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1440x900 Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better linux-kernel-build-conf1-6c16g . 294.90 |====================================== 2x6c_2x16GdualCh ............... 160.72 |===================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 ....... 161.55 |===================== C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz shuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 4744.6 |============================================ C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz bitshuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 2465.2 |============================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 48.88 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 49.11 |============================================= Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 250077433 |========================================= simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.10 |============================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.46 |============================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 0.46 |============================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.35 |============================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.46 |============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1426.3 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1442.0 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1680.0 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1693.9 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 398.7 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 384.2 |=========================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1720.0 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1709.1 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 26.6 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 27.1 |============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1516.8 |=========================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1551.3 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 300.9 |========================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 319.2 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1818.4 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1809.0 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 364.4 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 365.0 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1840.7 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1854.1 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 23.8 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 24.4 |============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1586.1 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1589.8 |============================================ ArrayFire 3.7 Test: BLAS CPU GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 405.13 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 408.69 |============================================ ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.867792 |========================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1.859928 |========================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 42.47 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 42.81 |============================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 91.16 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 90.94 |============================================= Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1970.06 |=========================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1965.41 |=========================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 118.61 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 118.76 |============================================ Timed Gem5 Compilation 21.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 715.29 |============================================ Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 211.55 |============================================ Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 48.31 |============================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1919.45 |=========================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1052.35 |=========================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1115.13 |=========================================== Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 86.79 |============================================= Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 62.32 |============================================= Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1036.93 |=========================================== Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 120.64 |============================================ Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 38.97 |============================================= Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 570.65 |============================================ Build2 0.13 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 219.69 |============================================ Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 176.54 |============================================ Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 197.28 |============================================ Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 136.39 |============================================ Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 4.15 |============================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 794777 |============================================ Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 316726 |============================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1285.8 |============================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1282.9 |============================================ Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 222.6 |============================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 217.3 |============================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 232.5 |============================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 235.5 |============================================= Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1031.6 |============================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1021.4 |============================================ Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 227.6 |============================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 233.9 |============================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 235.2 |============================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 217.2 |============================================= SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 128.82 |============================================ PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 2021 |============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 456 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 689 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 228 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 206 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 268 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 50.8 |============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 955 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 49.0 |============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 206 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 347 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 19.1 |============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 123 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 982 |=============================================== Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 95.47 |============================================= srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: OFDM_Test Samples / Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 46933333 |========================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 186.8 |============================================= srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 58.6 |============================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 190.1 |============================================= srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 63.6 |============================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 209.6 |============================================= srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 62.6 |============================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 210.4 |============================================= srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 66.7 |============================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 9.2 |=============================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 4.5 |=============================================== LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: Five Back to Back FIR Filters MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 472.7 |============================================= LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: FM Deemphasis Filter MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 235.2 |============================================= LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: Hilbert Transform MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 55.7 |============================================== LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: Complex Phase MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 311.9 |============================================= GNU Radio Test: Five Back to Back FIR Filters MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 434.2 |============================================= GNU Radio Test: Signal Source (Cosine) MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 1298.4 |============================================ GNU Radio Test: FIR Filter MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 349.0 |============================================= GNU Radio Test: IIR Filter MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 234.5 |============================================= GNU Radio Test: FM Deemphasis Filter MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 388.7 |============================================= GNU Radio Test: Hilbert Transform MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 225.6 |============================================= Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 27680333 |========================================== Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 52599667 |========================================== Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 106156667 |========================================= Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 206330000 |========================================= Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 311723333 |========================================= Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 24 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 . 345713333 |=========================================