kam

Running pts/pyperformance-1.0.2 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2211232-BE-KAM29174296
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

C/C++ Compiler Tests 4 Tests
CPU Massive 4 Tests
Creator Workloads 4 Tests
Fortran Tests 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 3 Tests
Imaging 2 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 3 Tests
Multi-Core 3 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 2 Tests
Scientific Computing 2 Tests
Server 3 Tests
Server CPU Tests 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
RAM Performance Test
November 08 2022
 
PostMark Test
November 10 2022
 
Dolfyn Test
November 10 2022
 
FFTE Test
November 10 2022
 
Webp Image Test
November 10 2022
 
GraphicsMagick Test
November 15 2022
 
Coremark Test
November 15 2022
 
AO Bench Test
November 23 2022
 
Perl Benchmark
November 23 2022
 
RNNoice Test
November 23 2022
 
Open SSL Test
November 23 2022
 
SQLite SpeedTest
November 23 2022
 
PyPerformance Test
November 23 2022
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

kam Running pts/pyperformance-1.0.2 via the Phoronix Test Suite. RAM Performance Test: Processor: Unknown (2 Cores), Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 32GB SC32G, Monitor: DELL U2312HM OS: Fedora 33, Kernel: 5.15.10+ (riscv64), Desktop: Xfce, Compiler: Clang 11.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 PostMark Test: Processor: Unknown (2 Cores), Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 32GB SC32G, Monitor: DELL U2312HM OS: Fedora 33, Kernel: 5.15.10+ (riscv64), Desktop: Xfce, Compiler: Clang 11.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Dolfyn Test: Processor: Unknown (2 Cores), Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 32GB SC32G, Monitor: DELL U2312HM OS: Fedora 33, Kernel: 5.15.10+ (riscv64), Desktop: Xfce, Compiler: Clang 11.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 FFTE Test: Processor: Unknown (2 Cores), Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 32GB SC32G, Monitor: DELL U2312HM OS: Fedora 33, Kernel: 5.15.10+ (riscv64), Desktop: Xfce, Compiler: Clang 11.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Webp Image Test: Processor: Unknown (2 Cores), Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 32GB SC32G, Monitor: DELL U2312HM OS: Fedora 33, Kernel: 5.15.10+ (riscv64), Desktop: Xfce, Compiler: Clang 11.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 GraphicsMagick Test: Processor: Unknown (2 Cores), Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 32GB SC32G, Monitor: DELL U2312HM OS: Fedora 33, Kernel: 5.15.10+ (riscv64), Desktop: Xfce, Compiler: Clang 11.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Coremark Test: Processor: Unknown (2 Cores), Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 32GB SC32G, Monitor: DELL U2312HM OS: Fedora 33, Kernel: 5.15.10+ (riscv64), Desktop: Xfce, Compiler: Clang 11.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 AO Bench Test: Processor: Unknown (2 Cores), Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 32GB SC32G, Monitor: Acer K202HQLA OS: Fedora 33, Kernel: 5.15.10+ (riscv64), Desktop: Xfce, Compiler: Clang 11.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1366x768 Perl Benchmark: Processor: Unknown (2 Cores), Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 32GB SC32G, Monitor: Acer K202HQLA OS: Fedora 33, Kernel: 5.15.10+ (riscv64), Desktop: Xfce, Compiler: Clang 11.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1366x768 RNNoice Test: Processor: Unknown (2 Cores), Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 32GB SC32G, Monitor: Acer K202HQLA OS: Fedora 33, Kernel: 5.15.10+ (riscv64), Desktop: Xfce, Compiler: Clang 11.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1366x768 Open SSL Test: Processor: Unknown (2 Cores), Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 32GB SC32G, Monitor: Acer K202HQLA OS: Fedora 33, Kernel: 5.15.10+ (riscv64), Desktop: Xfce, Compiler: Clang 11.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1366x768 SQLite SpeedTest: Processor: Unknown (2 Cores), Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 32GB SC32G, Monitor: Acer K202HQLA OS: Fedora 33, Kernel: 5.15.10+ (riscv64), Desktop: Xfce, Compiler: Clang 11.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1366x768 PyPerformance Test: Processor: Unknown (2 Cores), Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 32GB SC32G, Monitor: Acer K202HQLA OS: Fedora 33, Kernel: 5.15.10+ (riscv64), Desktop: Xfce, Compiler: Clang 11.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1366x768 GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better GraphicsMagick Test . 4 |====================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better GraphicsMagick Test . 21 |===================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better GraphicsMagick Test . 4 |====================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better GraphicsMagick Test . 2 |====================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better GraphicsMagick Test . 10 |===================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better GraphicsMagick Test . 3 |====================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better GraphicsMagick Test . 12 |===================================================== Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better Coremark Test . 6150.85 |====================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better RAM Performance Test . 462.62 |================================================ FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better FFTE Test . 424.37 |=========================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Default MP/s > Higher Is Better Webp Image Test . 39.27 |===================================================== Webp Image Test . 39.32 |===================================================== Webp Image Test . 39.69 |====================================================== Webp Image Test . 38.74 |===================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100 MP/s > Higher Is Better Webp Image Test . 53.69 |====================================================== Webp Image Test . 50.61 |=================================================== Webp Image Test . 52.14 |==================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless MP/s > Higher Is Better Webp Image Test . 288.57 |===================================================== Webp Image Test . 276.61 |=================================================== Webp Image Test . 277.04 |=================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better Webp Image Test . 91.90 |====================================================== Webp Image Test . 86.28 |=================================================== Webp Image Test . 91.83 |====================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better Webp Image Test . 865.54 |===================================================== Webp Image Test . 870.71 |===================================================== Webp Image Test . 865.90 |===================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better Open SSL Test . 13.30 |======================================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better PostMark Test . 216 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance Test . 9.22 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance Test . 10.33 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance Test . 3.78 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance Test . 4.68 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance Test . 4.38 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance Test . 590 |===================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance Test . 18.17 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance Test . 574 |===================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance Test . 3.68 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance Test . 5.55 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance Test . 156 |===================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance Test . 2.18 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance Test . 17.60 |=================================================== Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better Dolfyn Test . 740.55 |========================================================= AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better AO Bench Test . 564.66 |======================================================= Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better Perl Benchmark . 2.69599882 |================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better Perl Benchmark . 0.01357990 |================================================== RNNoise 2020-06-28 Phoronix Test Suite v5.8.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better RNNoice Test . 225.35 |======================================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better SQLite SpeedTest . 1941.01 |===================================================