Threadripper 1920x AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 12-Core testing with a ASRock X399 Taichi (P3.90 BIOS) and AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. .CPU: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 12-Core @ 3.50GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock X399 Taichi (P3.90 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Lexar 512GB SSD + 0GB CD-ROM Drive, Graphics: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 (1086/1250MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: PI-KVM Video, Network: 2 x Intel I211 + Intel Dual Band-AC 3168NGW OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-50-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.4, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Threadripper 1920x: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 12-Core @ 3.50GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock X399 Taichi (P3.90 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Lexar 512GB SSD + 0GB CD-ROM Drive, Graphics: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 (1086/1250MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: EK240Y, Network: 2 x Intel I211 + Intel Dual Band-AC 3168NGW OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-50-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.4, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0 + Clang 14.0.0-1ubuntu1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better .CPU . 18.39 |================================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 4.5 |=================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better .CPU . 583.65 |================================================================ LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 22.4 |================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better .CPU . 118.43 |================================================================ LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 22.4 |================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better .CPU . 118.11 |================================================================ LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better .CPU . 18.34 |================================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better .CPU . 30.66 |================================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better .CPU . 104.36 |================================================================ LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 23.1 |================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better .CPU . 114.90 |================================================================ SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better .CPU . 5.636 |================================================================= BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better .CPU . 932009 |================================================================ BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better .CPU . 11537 |================================================================= simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 2.33 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 3.47 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 0.89 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 3.13 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 3.43 |================================================================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 4606 |================================================================== ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 911881 |================================================================ Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.14669573 |============================================================ Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.00095874 |============================================================ OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 15789003590 |=========================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 2374.5 |================================================================ OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 153441.6 |============================================================== Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better .CPU . 8.40 |================================================================== ClickHouse 22.5.4.19 100M Rows Web Analytics Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better .CPU . 145.72 |================================================================ ClickHouse 22.5.4.19 100M Rows Web Analytics Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better .CPU . 152.81 |================================================================ ClickHouse 22.5.4.19 100M Rows Web Analytics Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better .CPU . 155.74 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.2.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better .CPU . 108.54 |================================================================ Apache CouchDB 3.2.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better .CPU . 368.22 |================================================================ Apache CouchDB 3.2.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better .CPU . 186.61 |================================================================ Apache CouchDB 3.2.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 3000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better .CPU . 632.16 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Memcached 1.6.16 Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Memcached 1.6.16 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Memcached 1.6.16 Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Memcached 1.6.16 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1961442.12 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1351158.46 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1698890.13 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1923682.37 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1492628.66 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1347115.37 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1720141.75 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1875884.87 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1214319.92 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1491813.09 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1345718.21 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1128180.46 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1169344.79 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1545848.58 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1183256.83 |============================================================ KeyDB 6.2.0 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 8 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 20172 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.050 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 2191 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.457 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 262353 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.191 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 304867 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.329 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 273620 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.914 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 2996 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 16.69 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 238910 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 2.093 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 19987 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.05 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 2614 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 38.26 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1636 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 152.82 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 762 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 674.56 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 2063 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.485 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 266420 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.188 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 17212 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.059 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 293675 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.341 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 252615 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.990 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 20726 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 2.521 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 216768 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 2.307 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 1814 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.552 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 193244 |================================================================ PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.259 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better .CPU . 3188 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better .CPU . 0.314 |================================================================= Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Seconds < Lower Is Better QMCPACK 3.13 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 385.27 |================================================== dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 159.24 |================================================== dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 542.67 |================================================== dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 321.54 |================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 0.14 |==================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 4.61 |==================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 21.42 |=================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 7.97 |==================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 28.54 |=================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 36.94 |=================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 37.75 |=================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 0.41 |==================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 10.65 |=================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 42.56 |=================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 26.43 |=================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 63.30 |=================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 74.69 |=================================================== AOM AV1 3.5 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 76.45 |=================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 6.91 |==================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 7.08 |==================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 29.54 |=================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 30.51 |=================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 15.64 |=================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 26.67 |=================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 56.67 |=================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 101.44 |================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 0.385 |=================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 1.954 |=================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 2.553 |=================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 6.557 |=================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 1.272 |=================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 29.11 |=================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 10 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 55.93 |=================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 82.36 |=================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 3.944 |=================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 78.74 |=================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 166.26 |================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 280.31 |================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 2.21 |==================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 35.80 |=================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 65.80 |=================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 8.76 |==================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 106.92 |================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 205.69 |================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 48.15 |=================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 161.90 |================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 51.29 |=================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 165.78 |================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 39.56 |=================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 135.99 |================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 4.17 |==================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 9.65 |==================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 9.78 |==================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 21.00 |=================================================== x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 28.94 |=================================================== x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 114.09 |================================================== x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 13.25 |=================================================== x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 43.19 |=================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better libavif avifenc 0.10 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better libavif avifenc 0.10 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better libavif avifenc 0.10 Encoder Speed: 6 Seconds < Lower Is Better libavif avifenc 0.10 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better libavif avifenc 0.10 Encoder Speed: 10, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better Monkey Audio Encoding 3.99.6 WAV To APE Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 9.166 |=================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 22.49 |=================================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 8.467 |=================================================== Ogg Audio Encoding 1.3.4 Seconds < Lower Is Better Opus Codec Encoding 1.3.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 6.308 |=================================================== WavPack Audio Encoding 5.3 WAV To WavPack Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 1920x . 13.42 |===================================================