2022-11-04

Intel Core i7-4790K testing with a ASRock H97 Anniversary (P1.10 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA NV136 6GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2211042-SSNS-202211090
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Audio Encoding 7 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 5 Tests
Creator Workloads 7 Tests
Encoding 7 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 3 Tests
Machine Learning 3 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 2 Tests
Python 6 Tests
Server CPU Tests 4 Tests
Single-Threaded 5 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
audio-encoding
November 04 2022
  2 Hours, 14 Minutes
python
November 04 2022
  42 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  1 Hour, 28 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

2022-11-04 Intel Core i7-4790K testing with a ASRock H97 Anniversary (P1.10 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA NV136 6GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. audio-encoding: Processor: Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.40GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock H97 Anniversary (P1.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 4th Gen Core DRAM, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 870, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NV136 6GB, Audio: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th, Monitor: 27GL850, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Broadcom BCM4360 802.11ac OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-52-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.5, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 22.0.5, Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0 + CUDA 11.5, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440 python: Processor: Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.40GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock H97 Anniversary (P1.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 4th Gen Core DRAM, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 870, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NV136 6GB, Audio: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th, Monitor: 27GL850, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Broadcom BCM4360 802.11ac OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-52-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.5, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 22.0.5, Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0 + CUDA 11.5, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440 Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_ica Seconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 54.68 |======================================================= python ......... 54.99 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 18.2 |======================================================== python ......... 18.3 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 42.3 |======================================================== python ......... 42.1 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 22.5 |======================================================== python ......... 22.6 |======================================================== Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 25.92 |======================================================= python ......... 26.02 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 401 |========================================================= python ......... 400 |========================================================= PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 1038 |======================================================== python ......... 1037 |======================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better audio-encoding . 325.53 |====================================================== python ......... 325.23 |====================================================== WavPack Audio Encoding 5.3 WAV To WavPack Seconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 13.72 |======================================================= Opus Codec Encoding 1.3.1 WAV To Opus Encode Seconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 8.017 |======================================================= Ogg Audio Encoding 1.3.4 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 21.03 |======================================================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 8.800 |======================================================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 19.64 |======================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better audio-encoding . 1.261482 |==================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better audio-encoding . 0.666308 |==================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better audio-encoding . 0.964720 |==================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better audio-encoding . 1.211917 |==================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better audio-encoding . 1.302031 |==================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better audio-encoding . 0.655964 |==================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better audio-encoding . 0.944231 |==================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better audio-encoding . 1.270755 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 10.1 |======================================================== python ......... 10.1 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 160 |========================================================= python ......... 160 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 104 |========================================================= python ......... 104 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 442 |========================================================= python ......... 442 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 125 |========================================================= python ......... 125 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 103 |========================================================= python ......... 103 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 96.8 |======================================================== python ......... 96.8 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 315 |========================================================= python ......... 315 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better audio-encoding . 218 |========================================================= python ......... 218 |========================================================= Monkey Audio Encoding 3.99.6 Seconds < Lower Is Better Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Bayesian Changepoint Seconds < Lower Is Better Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Earthgecko Skyline Seconds < Lower Is Better Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Windowed Gaussian Seconds < Lower Is Better Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Relative Entropy Seconds < Lower Is Better Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: EXPoSE Seconds < Lower Is Better