1280p october Intel Core i7-1280P testing with a MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS) and MSI Intel ADL GT2 14GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: Intel Core i7-1280P @ 4.80GHz (14 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH, Graphics: MSI Intel ADL GT2 14GB (1450MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC274, Network: Intel Alder Lake-P PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-43-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.24.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.5, Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: Intel Core i7-1280P @ 4.80GHz (14 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH, Graphics: MSI Intel ADL GT2 14GB (1450MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC274, Network: Intel Alder Lake-P PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-43-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.24.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.5, Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Bumper Beam Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 350.53 |=================================================================== B . 337.54 |================================================================= OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 268.34 |=================================================================== B . 259.53 |================================================================= OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Bird Strike on Windshield Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 582.79 |=================================================================== B . 571.29 |================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installation Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 455.47 |=================================================================== B . 455.55 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1171.56 |================================================================== B . 1177.52 |================================================================== Xmrig 6.18.1 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better A . 3546.7 |=================================================================== B . 3511.5 |================================================================== Xmrig 6.18.1 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better A . 4515.4 |=================================================================== B . 4454.1 |================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: PNG - Quality: 80 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 8.24 |===================================================================== B . 8.18 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: PNG - Quality: 90 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 8.13 |===================================================================== B . 8.09 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: JPEG - Quality: 80 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 8.12 |===================================================================== B . 8.08 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: JPEG - Quality: 90 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 7.95 |===================================================================== B . 7.93 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: PNG - Quality: 100 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.71 |==================================================================== B . 0.72 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: JPEG - Quality: 100 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.7 |====================================================================== B . 0.7 |====================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 47.73 |==================================================================== B . 46.84 |=================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 230.27 |=================================================================== B . 227.60 |================================================================== QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 1 - Resolution: 4K FPS > Higher Is Better A . 4.42 |===================================================================== B . 4.42 |===================================================================== QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 2 - Resolution: 4K FPS > Higher Is Better A . 1.23 |===================================================================== B . 1.22 |==================================================================== QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 3 - Resolution: 4K FPS > Higher Is Better A . 1.01 |===================================================================== B . 1.01 |===================================================================== QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 5 - Resolution: 4K FPS > Higher Is Better A . 0.3 |====================================================================== B . 0.3 |====================================================================== QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 1 - Resolution: 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 16.45 |==================================================================== B . 16.32 |=================================================================== QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 2 - Resolution: 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 4.68 |===================================================================== B . 4.68 |===================================================================== QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 3 - Resolution: 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 3.87 |===================================================================== B . 3.88 |===================================================================== QuadRay 2022.05.25 Scene: 5 - Resolution: 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 1.18 |===================================================================== B . 1.16 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 209.81 |================================================================== B . 212.10 |=================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 90.82 |==================================================================== B . 90.74 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 6 Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.843 |==================================================================== B . 7.901 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.49 |==================================================================== B . 11.53 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 10, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 5.852 |==================================================================== B . 5.738 |=================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 16.65 |==================================================================== B . 16.55 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 291.22 |================================================================== B . 293.87 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 303.96 |=================================================================== B . 305.31 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: scrypt kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 102.29 |=================================================================== B . 102.45 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 5429.97 |================================================================== B . 5399.00 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 1507.25 |================================================================== B . 1502.06 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 226780 |=================================================================== B . 226410 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 1280.74 |================================================================== B . 1273.47 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 44430 |==================================================================== B . 44480 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 7904.25 |================================================================== B . 7709.44 |================================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 15260 |==================================================================== B . 15260 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 55050 |==================================================================== B . 54960 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 116170 |=================================================================== B . 115560 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.10 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better A . 74.37 |==================================================================== B . 74.90 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.10 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better A . 81.75 |==================================================================== B . 81.40 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.10 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better A . 86.94 |==================================================================== B . 86.99 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.10 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better A . 93.65 |==================================================================== B . 93.46 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.10 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better A . 37.73 |==================================================================== B . 37.61 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.10 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better A . 12.84 |==================================================================== B . 12.89 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.10 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better A . 37.14 |==================================================================== B . 37.17 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.10 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better A . 13.34 |==================================================================== B . 13.26 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.10 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better A . 38.30 |==================================================================== B . 38.21 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.10 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better A . 13.60 |==================================================================== B . 13.51 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.10 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better A . 39.81 |==================================================================== B . 39.68 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.10 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 4.0091 |=================================================================== B . 4.0122 |=================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 1662.03 |================================================================== B . 1649.63 |================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 3.8591 |=================================================================== B . 3.8836 |=================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 259.12 |=================================================================== B . 257.49 |=================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 17.59 |==================================================================== B . 17.59 |==================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 396.33 |=================================================================== B . 396.88 |=================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 14.83 |==================================================================== B . 14.66 |=================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 67.42 |=================================================================== B . 68.22 |==================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 25.34 |================================================================ B . 26.74 |==================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 274.72 |=================================================================== B . 259.38 |=============================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 23.36 |==================================================================== B . 23.29 |==================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 42.80 |==================================================================== B . 42.93 |==================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 52.91 |==================================================================== B . 52.84 |==================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 131.68 |=================================================================== B . 131.74 |=================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 43.88 |==================================================================== B . 43.73 |==================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 22.78 |==================================================================== B . 22.86 |==================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 35.69 |================================================================= B . 37.16 |==================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 194.74 |=================================================================== B . 187.90 |================================================================= Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 31.58 |=================================================================== B . 32.03 |==================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 31.66 |==================================================================== B . 31.22 |=================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 16.99 |==================================================================== B . 17.05 |==================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 408.20 |=================================================================== B . 405.18 |=================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 14.91 |=================================================================== B . 15.06 |==================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 67.07 |==================================================================== B . 66.41 |=================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 3.9097 |================================================================== B . 3.9958 |=================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 1753.05 |================================================================== B . 1714.86 |================================================================= Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream items/sec > Higher Is Better A . 3.8307 |================================================================== B . 3.8664 |=================================================================== Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream ms/batch < Lower Is Better A . 261.04 |=================================================================== B . 258.63 |================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B . 13459 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B . 72964 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B . 57202 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B . 358633 |=================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2650 |===================================================================== B . 2455 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 368 |================================================================= B . 398 |====================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 12009 |==================================================================== B . 12067 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 324 |====================================================================== B . 322 |====================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 4219 |===================================================================== B . 3704 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 229 |============================================================= B . 263 |====================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 20447 |==================================================================== B . 17289 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 188 |=========================================================== B . 224 |====================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 13112 |==================================================================== B . 9296 |================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 75 |================================================= B . 107 |====================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 26025 |================================================================ B . 27633 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 152 |====================================================================== B . 143 |================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 25707 |================================================================== B . 26455 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 36 |======================================================================= B . 35 |===================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 59181 |======================================================= B . 72706 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 64 |======================================================================= B . 51 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 18161 |==================================================================== B . 13831 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 54 |===================================================== B . 72 |======================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 57264 |==================================================================== B . 24555 |============================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 69 |============================== B . 162 |====================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 75552 |==================================================================== B . 75081 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 13 |======================================================================= B . 13 |======================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 80850 |==================================================================== B . 77312 |================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 35 |======================================================================= B . 32 |================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 4195 |============================================================ B . 4831 |===================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 232 |====================================================================== B . 201 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 17814 |================================================================ B . 19048 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 217 |====================================================================== B . 203 |================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 24691 |=============================================================== B . 26667 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 36 |======================================================================= B . 34 |=================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 69330 |==================================================================== B . 65691 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 54 |==================================================================== B . 56 |======================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 4281 |===================================================================== B . 4141 |=================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 225 |=================================================================== B . 234 |====================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 19162 |==================================================================== B . 19243 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 198 |===================================================================== B . 200 |====================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 16965 |==================================================================== B . 16144 |================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 58 |==================================================================== B . 61 |======================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 50972 |==================================================================== B . 42859 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 78 |============================================================ B . 92 |======================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1968 |============================================== B . 2961 |===================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 500 |====================================================================== B . 330 |============================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 11327 |================================================================== B . 11599 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 344 |====================================================================== B . 336 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 101153 |================================================================= B . 103993 |=================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 9 |======================================================================== B . 9 |======================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 63061 |================================================================= B . 66265 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 59 |======================================================================= B . 59 |======================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 17087 |==================================================================== B . 16057 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 58 |==================================================================== B . 61 |======================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 27224 |==================================================================== B . 27312 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 146 |====================================================================== B . 146 |====================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 8110 |===================================================================== B . 8024 |==================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 123 |===================================================================== B . 124 |====================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 16704 |==================================================================== B . 15905 |================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better A . 239 |=================================================================== B . 250 |====================================================================== Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B . 66 |======================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 10000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B . 46 |======================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B . 17 |======================================================================= Apache HBase 2.5.0 Rows: 1000000 - Test: Scan - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B . 11 |=======================================================================