Intel Core i5-12600K testing with a ASUS PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 (0605 BIOS) and ASUS Intel ADL-S GT1 15GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2209087-PTS-12600KSE38
12600k sept
Intel Core i5-12600K testing with a ASUS PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 (0605 BIOS) and ASUS Intel ADL-S GT1 15GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
A:
Processor: Intel Core i5-12600K @ 6.30GHz (10 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 (0605 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0, Graphics: ASUS Intel ADL-S GT1 15GB (1450MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Device 7af0
OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc6daily20220716-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
B:
Processor: Intel Core i5-12600K @ 6.30GHz (10 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 (0605 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0, Graphics: ASUS Intel ADL-S GT1 15GB (1450MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Device 7af0
OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc6daily20220716-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
C:
Processor: Intel Core i5-12600K @ 6.30GHz (10 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 (0605 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0, Graphics: ASUS Intel ADL-S GT1 15GB (1450MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Device 7af0
OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc6daily20220716-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
Unvanquished 0.53
Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 163.7 |====================================================================
B . 163.0 |====================================================================
C . 162.8 |====================================================================
Unvanquished 0.53
Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 79.5 |=====================================================================
B . 79.6 |=====================================================================
C . 79.6 |=====================================================================
Unvanquished 0.53
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 267.8 |====================================================================
B . 267.1 |====================================================================
C . 263.3 |===================================================================
Unvanquished 0.53
Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 243.7 |====================================================================
B . 245.2 |====================================================================
C . 244.7 |====================================================================
Unvanquished 0.53
Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultra
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 73.8 |=====================================================================
B . 73.7 |=====================================================================
C . 73.7 |=====================================================================
Unvanquished 0.53
Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 39.4 |=====================================================================
B . 39.4 |=====================================================================
C . 39.3 |=====================================================================
Unvanquished 0.53
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 114.0 |====================================================================
B . 114.1 |====================================================================
C . 114.0 |====================================================================
Unvanquished 0.53
Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Ultra
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 105.7 |====================================================================
B . 105.7 |====================================================================
C . 105.8 |====================================================================
Unvanquished 0.53
Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 66.4 |=====================================================================
B . 66.4 |=====================================================================
C . 66.4 |=====================================================================
Unvanquished 0.53
Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: High
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 137.2 |====================================================================
B . 136.7 |====================================================================
C . 136.5 |====================================================================
Unvanquished 0.53
Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: High
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 204.4 |====================================================================
B . 205.6 |====================================================================
C . 203.9 |===================================================================
BRL-CAD 7.32.6
VGR Performance Metric
VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better
A . 206019 |===================================================================
B . 205796 |===================================================================
C . 205167 |===================================================================
ASTC Encoder 4.0
Preset: Fast
MT/s > Higher Is Better
A . 160.13 |===================================================================
B . 160.03 |===================================================================
C . 160.06 |===================================================================
ASTC Encoder 4.0
Preset: Medium
MT/s > Higher Is Better
A . 60.85 |====================================================================
B . 60.87 |====================================================================
C . 60.89 |====================================================================
ASTC Encoder 4.0
Preset: Thorough
MT/s > Higher Is Better
A . 7.9430 |===================================================================
B . 7.9426 |===================================================================
C . 7.9396 |===================================================================
ASTC Encoder 4.0
Preset: Exhaustive
MT/s > Higher Is Better
A . 0.7483 |===================================================================
B . 0.7482 |===================================================================
C . 0.7486 |===================================================================
AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2
Device Inference Score
Score > Higher Is Better
A . 1032 |=====================================================================
B . 1029 |=====================================================================
C . 1029 |=====================================================================
AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2
Device Training Score
Score > Higher Is Better
A . 1672 |=====================================================================
B . 1673 |=====================================================================
C . 1674 |=====================================================================
AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2
Device AI Score
Score > Higher Is Better
A . 2704 |=====================================================================
B . 2702 |=====================================================================
C . 2703 |=====================================================================
Mobile Neural Network 2.1
Model: nasnet
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 9.296 |===================================================================
B . 9.287 |===================================================================
C . 9.375 |====================================================================
Mobile Neural Network 2.1
Model: mobilenetV3
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.206 |===================================================================
B . 1.200 |===================================================================
C . 1.216 |====================================================================
Mobile Neural Network 2.1
Model: squeezenetv1.1
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 3.058 |====================================================================
B . 2.657 |===========================================================
C . 3.051 |====================================================================
Mobile Neural Network 2.1
Model: resnet-v2-50
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 20.05 |==============================================================
B . 20.30 |===============================================================
C . 21.97 |====================================================================
Mobile Neural Network 2.1
Model: SqueezeNetV1.0
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 5.095 |====================================================================
B . 4.928 |==================================================================
C . 5.049 |===================================================================
Mobile Neural Network 2.1
Model: MobileNetV2_224
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 2.394 |==================================================================
B . 2.408 |==================================================================
C . 2.470 |====================================================================
Mobile Neural Network 2.1
Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 2.454 |====================================================================
B . 2.428 |===================================================================
C . 2.444 |====================================================================
Mobile Neural Network 2.1
Model: inception-v3
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 26.70 |====================================================================
B . 26.70 |====================================================================
C . 26.27 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 11.16 |==============================================================
B . 12.31 |====================================================================
C . 11.64 |================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 3.46 |=================================================================
B . 3.66 |=====================================================================
C . 3.49 |==================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 2.79 |==================================================================
B . 2.90 |=====================================================================
C . 2.83 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 3.14 |=====================================================================
B . 3.06 |===================================================================
C . 3.09 |====================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 3.00 |====================================================================
B . 3.04 |=====================================================================
C . 3.02 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 5.44 |=====================================================================
B . 5.44 |=====================================================================
C . 5.41 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: blazeface
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.02 |=====================================================================
B . 1.02 |=====================================================================
C . 1.02 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: googlenet
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 9.22 |===================================================================
B . 9.16 |==================================================================
C . 9.53 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: vgg16
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 37.96 |====================================================================
B . 37.99 |====================================================================
C . 38.14 |====================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: resnet18
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 7.51 |=====================================================================
B . 7.41 |====================================================================
C . 7.40 |====================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: alexnet
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 5.77 |=====================================================================
B . 5.76 |=====================================================================
C . 5.73 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: resnet50
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 14.37 |===================================================================
B . 14.40 |===================================================================
C . 14.57 |====================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 19.86 |====================================================================
B . 20.00 |====================================================================
C . 19.20 |=================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 13.40 |===================================================================
B . 13.60 |====================================================================
C . 13.31 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 8.61 |=====================================================================
B . 8.61 |=====================================================================
C . 8.63 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: vision_transformer
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 204.96 |==============================================================
B . 204.75 |==============================================================
C . 221.23 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: CPU - Model: FastestDet
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 4.07 |============================================================
B . 4.03 |============================================================
C . 4.67 |=====================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mobilenet
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 482.96 |===================================================================
B . 483.87 |===================================================================
C . 481.76 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 150.34 |===================================================================
B . 150.56 |===================================================================
C . 150.22 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 139.49 |===================================================================
B . 139.27 |===================================================================
C . 138.77 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: shufflenet-v2
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 79.04 |====================================================================
B . 79.41 |====================================================================
C . 79.43 |====================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mnasnet
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 157.20 |===================================================================
B . 157.30 |===================================================================
C . 156.92 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: efficientnet-b0
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 257.97 |==================================================================
B . 260.09 |===================================================================
C . 259.64 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: blazeface
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 32.23 |====================================================================
B . 32.29 |====================================================================
C . 32.21 |====================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: googlenet
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 405.89 |===================================================================
B . 405.86 |===================================================================
C . 405.42 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vgg16
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1906.45 |==================================================================
B . 1903.62 |==================================================================
C . 1896.06 |==================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet18
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 364.07 |===================================================================
B . 365.00 |===================================================================
C . 364.29 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: alexnet
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 377.29 |==================================================================
B . 381.28 |===================================================================
C . 377.61 |==================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet50
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 940.23 |==================================================================
B . 940.99 |==================================================================
C . 950.14 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: yolov4-tiny
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 622.75 |===================================================================
B . 627.21 |===================================================================
C . 623.95 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 365.93 |===================================================================
B . 366.55 |===================================================================
C . 365.07 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: regnety_400m
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 188.61 |===================================================================
B . 189.02 |===================================================================
C . 188.96 |===================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vision_transformer
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 5945.17 |==================================================================
B . 5943.47 |==================================================================
C . 5956.11 |==================================================================
NCNN 20220729
Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: FastestDet
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 79.40 |====================================================================
B . 79.21 |====================================================================
C . 78.85 |====================================================================
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022
Model: 20k Atoms
ns/day > Higher Is Better
A . 5.196 |====================================================================
B . 5.207 |====================================================================
C . 5.227 |====================================================================
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022
Model: Rhodopsin Protein
ns/day > Higher Is Better
A . 5.825 |====================================================================
B . 5.695 |==================================================================
C . 5.862 |====================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
A . 2.28 |=====================================================================
B . 2.28 |=====================================================================
C . 2.28 |=====================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1730.06 |==================================================================
B . 1734.99 |==================================================================
C . 1736.86 |==================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
A . 1.74 |=====================================================================
B . 1.74 |=====================================================================
C . 1.74 |=====================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 2257.35 |==================================================================
B . 2255.03 |==================================================================
C . 2256.98 |==================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
A . 1.74 |=====================================================================
B . 1.75 |=====================================================================
C . 1.74 |=====================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 2257.15 |==================================================================
B . 2252.28 |==================================================================
C . 2255.20 |==================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
A . 205.21 |==================================================================
B . 206.79 |===================================================================
C . 204.23 |==================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 19.48 |====================================================================
B . 19.33 |===================================================================
C . 19.57 |====================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
A . 10.07 |====================================================================
B . 10.06 |====================================================================
C . 10.06 |====================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 395.54 |===================================================================
B . 395.59 |===================================================================
C . 395.44 |===================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
A . 462.34 |===================================================================
B . 463.70 |===================================================================
C . 463.87 |===================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 8.64 |=====================================================================
B . 8.61 |=====================================================================
C . 8.61 |=====================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
A . 278.74 |===================================================================
B . 192.88 |==============================================
C . 193.22 |==============================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 14.34 |===================
B . 51.76 |====================================================================
C . 51.71 |====================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
A . 31.28 |====================================================================
B . 31.37 |====================================================================
C . 31.43 |====================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 127.81 |===================================================================
B . 127.36 |===================================================================
C . 127.17 |===================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
A . 754.73 |===================================================================
B . 742.81 |==================================================================
C . 741.97 |==================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 13.16 |===================================================================
B . 13.38 |====================================================================
C . 13.39 |====================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
A . 361.68 |===================================================================
B . 359.57 |===================================================================
C . 360.51 |===================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 11.05 |====================================================================
B . 11.11 |====================================================================
C . 11.08 |====================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
A . 5175.16 |==================================================================
B . 5129.86 |=================================================================
C . 5136.99 |==================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.84 |====================================================================
B . 1.86 |=====================================================================
C . 1.85 |=====================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
A . 13292.83 |=================================================================
B . 13347.46 |=================================================================
C . 13357.94 |=================================================================
OpenVINO 2022.2.dev
Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 0.74 |=====================================================================
B . 0.74 |=====================================================================
C . 0.74 |=====================================================================
Aircrack-ng 1.7
k/s > Higher Is Better
A . 33031.90 |================================================================
B . 33109.84 |================================================================
C . 33749.55 |=================================================================
Primesieve 8.0
Length: 1e12
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 20.22 |====================================================================
B . 20.29 |====================================================================
C . 20.21 |====================================================================
Primesieve 8.0
Length: 1e13
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 236.72 |===================================================================
B . 235.76 |===================================================================
C . 236.41 |===================================================================
7-Zip Compression 22.01
Test: Compression Rating
MIPS > Higher Is Better
A . 75966 |===================================================================
B . 77477 |====================================================================
C . 77380 |====================================================================
7-Zip Compression 22.01
Test: Decompression Rating
MIPS > Higher Is Better
A . 61355 |====================================================================
B . 61210 |====================================================================
C . 59506 |==================================================================
Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 52.95 |====================================================================
B . 53.01 |====================================================================
C . 52.89 |====================================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: Swirl
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
A . 567 |=====================================================================
B . 573 |======================================================================
C . 575 |======================================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: Rotate
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
A . 1171 |==================================================================
B . 1210 |=====================================================================
C . 1217 |=====================================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: Sharpen
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
A . 166 |=====================================================================
B . 168 |======================================================================
C . 167 |======================================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: Enhanced
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
A . 270 |=====================================================================
B . 272 |======================================================================
C . 272 |======================================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: Resizing
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
A . 1148 |====================================================================
B . 1165 |=====================================================================
C . 1163 |=====================================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: Noise-Gaussian
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
A . 316 |=====================================================================
B . 319 |======================================================================
C . 317 |======================================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.38
Operation: HWB Color Space
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
A . 1190 |==================================================================
B . 1239 |=====================================================================
C . 1242 |=====================================================================
SVT-AV1 1.2
Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 2.030 |====================================================================
B . 2.016 |====================================================================
C . 2.020 |====================================================================
SVT-AV1 1.2
Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 43.53 |===================================================================
B . 43.71 |====================================================================
C . 43.96 |====================================================================
SVT-AV1 1.2
Encoder Mode: Preset 10 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 85.52 |==================================================================
B . 86.53 |==================================================================
C . 88.56 |====================================================================
SVT-AV1 1.2
Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 121.73 |================================================================
B . 127.04 |===================================================================
C . 125.22 |==================================================================
SVT-AV1 1.2
Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 6.359 |====================================================================
B . 6.359 |====================================================================
C . 6.344 |====================================================================
SVT-AV1 1.2
Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 119.55 |==================================================================
B . 120.54 |===================================================================
C . 118.97 |==================================================================
SVT-AV1 1.2
Encoder Mode: Preset 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 260.88 |==================================================================
B . 260.78 |==================================================================
C . 265.94 |===================================================================
SVT-AV1 1.2
Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 441.12 |=================================================================
B . 446.14 |=================================================================
C . 457.51 |===================================================================
Blender 3.3
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 107.38 |===================================================================
B . 107.60 |===================================================================
C . 107.26 |===================================================================
Blender 3.3
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 303.34 |===================================================================
B . 303.25 |===================================================================
C . 303.35 |===================================================================
Blender 3.3
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 154.91 |===================================================================
B . 154.74 |===================================================================
C . 155.23 |===================================================================
Blender 3.3
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 1242.71 |==================================================================
B . 1241.97 |==================================================================
C . 1242.78 |==================================================================
Blender 3.3
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 377.04 |===================================================================
B . 377.70 |===================================================================
C . 378.41 |===================================================================
Natron 2.4.3
Input: Spaceship
FPS > Higher Is Better
A . 3.6 |======================================================================
B . 3.6 |======================================================================
C . 3.5 |====================================================================
Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6
Build Configuration: Default
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 15.51 |====================================================================
B . 15.49 |====================================================================
C . 15.40 |====================================================================
Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6
Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 199.39 |===================================================================
B . 199.79 |===================================================================
C . 200.43 |===================================================================
Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 87.70 |===================================================================
B . 88.06 |====================================================================
C . 88.37 |====================================================================
Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 527.01 |===================================================================
B . 526.99 |===================================================================
C . 528.23 |===================================================================
Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 51.86 |====================================================================
B . 51.60 |====================================================================
C . 51.76 |====================================================================
C-Blosc 2.3
Test: blosclz shuffle
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 16672.5 |=================================================================
B . 16992.7 |==================================================================
C . 17013.4 |==================================================================
C-Blosc 2.3
Test: blosclz bitshuffle
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 8941.5 |=================================================================
B . 9258.0 |===================================================================
C . 9257.1 |===================================================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: OFDM_Test
Samples / Second > Higher Is Better
A . 168600000 |==========================================================
B . 183000000 |===============================================================
C . 185500000 |================================================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 523.5 |===================================================================
B . 527.8 |====================================================================
C . 521.2 |===================================================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 151.0 |====================================================================
B . 151.6 |====================================================================
C . 151.4 |====================================================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 541.2 |====================================================================
B . 537.6 |====================================================================
C . 534.7 |===================================================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 191.5 |====================================================================
B . 191.2 |====================================================================
C . 189.6 |===================================================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 581.7 |====================================================================
B . 578.8 |====================================================================
C . 578.7 |====================================================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 172.6 |====================================================================
B . 172.9 |====================================================================
C . 173.2 |====================================================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 594.7 |====================================================================
B . 590.7 |====================================================================
C . 587.8 |===================================================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 209.8 |====================================================================
B . 209.6 |====================================================================
C . 209.7 |====================================================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM
eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 189.4 |====================================================================
B . 189.3 |====================================================================
C . 188.4 |====================================================================
srsRAN 22.04.1
Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM
UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better
A . 88 |=======================================================================
B . 88 |=======================================================================
C . 87 |======================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 2.69 |==============================================================
B . 2.84 |=================================================================
C . 3.01 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 123.17 |===================================================================
B . 124.07 |===================================================================
C . 123.94 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.98 |====================================================================
B . 7.12 |=====================================================================
C . 7.00 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 2.94 |=====================================================================
B . 2.84 |==================================================================
C . 2.95 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 1.75 |================================================================
B . 1.88 |=====================================================================
C . 1.76 |=================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 1.41 |====================================================================
B . 1.44 |=====================================================================
C . 1.42 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 1.16 |=====================================================================
B . 1.11 |==================================================================
C . 1.13 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 2.89 |====================================================================
B . 2.95 |=====================================================================
C . 2.83 |==================================================================
Unvanquished 0.53
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 223.9 |====================================================================
B . 222.6 |====================================================================
C . 221.4 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 123.62 |==================================================================
B . 123.54 |==================================================================
C . 125.00 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.97 |=====================================================================
B . 7.01 |=====================================================================
C . 6.99 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 3.27 |=====================================================================
B . 3.28 |=====================================================================
C . 3.23 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 1.87 |====================================================================
B . 1.90 |=====================================================================
C . 1.89 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 1.44 |===============================================================
B . 1.40 |==============================================================
C . 1.57 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 1.39 |===================================================================
B . 1.44 |=====================================================================
C . 1.32 |===============================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 3.07 |=====================================================================
B . 3.07 |=====================================================================
C . 2.98 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 123.96 |===================================================================
B . 123.00 |==================================================================
C . 124.48 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.93 |=====================================================================
B . 6.95 |=====================================================================
C . 6.97 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 3.46 |====================================================================
B . 3.52 |=====================================================================
C . 3.48 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 1.98 |=================================================================
B . 2.11 |=====================================================================
C . 2.02 |==================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 1.803054303 |==========================================================
B . 1.920000000 |==============================================================
C . 1.850000000 |============================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 1.85 |=====================================================================
B . 1.54 |=========================================================
C . 1.50 |========================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 3.41 |=====================================================================
B . 3.38 |====================================================================
C . 3.37 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 122.35 |==================================================================
B . 124.03 |===================================================================
C . 124.53 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 7.00 |=====================================================================
B . 6.98 |=====================================================================
C . 6.87 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 3.78 |=====================================================================
B . 3.78 |=====================================================================
C . 3.78 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 2.34 |=====================================================================
B . 2.31 |====================================================================
C . 2.34 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 2.34 |====================================================================
B . 2.36 |=====================================================================
C . 2.19 |================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 2.02 |=====================================================================
B . 1.91 |=================================================================
C . 1.99 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 12.43 |====================================================================
B . 12.50 |====================================================================
C . 12.46 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 123.76 |==================================================================
B . 124.09 |==================================================================
C . 125.60 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.99 |=====================================================================
B . 6.98 |=====================================================================
C . 7.00 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.06 |==================================================================
B . 6.30 |====================================================================
C . 6.36 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 8.59 |=====================================================================
B . 8.40 |===================================================================
C . 8.46 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 10.22 |====================================================================
B . 10.20 |====================================================================
C . 10.06 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 10.08 |===================================================================
B . 10.16 |====================================================================
C . 10.21 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 12.23 |====================================================================
B . 12.03 |===================================================================
C . 11.98 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 122.86 |==================================================================
B . 124.13 |===================================================================
C . 124.29 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.97 |=====================================================================
B . 6.92 |=====================================================================
C . 6.92 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.51 |=====================================================================
B . 6.29 |===================================================================
C . 6.39 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 7.97 |===================================================================
B . 8.24 |=====================================================================
C . 8.07 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 9.28 |=====================================================================
B . 8.87 |==================================================================
C . 8.91 |==================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 8.86 |===================================================================
B . 9.09 |=====================================================================
C . 8.80 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 22.99 |====================================================================
B . 22.98 |====================================================================
C . 23.02 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 123.35 |==================================================================
B . 123.78 |==================================================================
C . 124.76 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 7.01 |=====================================================================
B . 6.95 |====================================================================
C . 6.99 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 9.91 |===================================================================
B . 10.03 |====================================================================
C . 9.61 |=================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 16.08 |====================================================================
B . 16.00 |===================================================================
C . 16.17 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 19.62 |====================================================================
B . 19.21 |==================================================================
C . 19.71 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 18.55 |================================================================
B . 19.68 |====================================================================
C . 19.17 |==================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 21.98 |====================================================================
B . 21.60 |===================================================================
C . 21.56 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 123.32 |===================================================================
B . 123.66 |===================================================================
C . 124.10 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.91 |====================================================================
B . 7.02 |=====================================================================
C . 6.90 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 9.07 |==================================================================
B . 9.49 |=====================================================================
C . 9.16 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 15.07 |===================================================================
B . 15.30 |====================================================================
C . 15.18 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 17.50 |===================================================================
B . 17.36 |==================================================================
C . 17.87 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 16.88 |================================================================
B . 17.88 |====================================================================
C . 16.87 |================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 41.36 |====================================================================
B . 41.57 |====================================================================
C . 41.35 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 123.60 |==================================================================
B . 123.90 |==================================================================
C . 125.16 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 7.00 |=====================================================================
B . 7.01 |=====================================================================
C . 6.98 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 24.74 |====================================================================
B . 24.87 |====================================================================
C . 24.86 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 30.17 |=================================================================
B . 30.88 |===================================================================
C . 31.51 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 34.20 |==================================================================
B . 34.59 |==================================================================
C . 35.46 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 33.09 |==============================================================
B . 36.21 |====================================================================
C . 34.75 |=================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 42.39 |====================================================================
B . 41.61 |===================================================================
C . 41.62 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 123.34 |===================================================================
B . 123.44 |===================================================================
C . 124.09 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.96 |=====================================================================
B . 6.91 |=====================================================================
C . 6.94 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 22.05 |====================================================================
B . 21.80 |===================================================================
C . 21.94 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 30.23 |===================================================================
B . 30.63 |====================================================================
C . 30.67 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 35.39 |====================================================================
B . 35.60 |====================================================================
C . 35.03 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 34.89 |====================================================================
B . 34.21 |===================================================================
C . 34.24 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 11.95 |==================================================================
B . 12.08 |===================================================================
C . 12.23 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 124.53 |=================================================================
B . 129.23 |===================================================================
C . 123.83 |================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.93 |==================================================================
B . 7.30 |=====================================================================
C . 6.91 |=================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.399788449 |==============================================================
B . 6.370000000 |==============================================================
C . 6.330000000 |=============================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 8.19 |=====================================================================
B . 8.09 |====================================================================
C . 8.15 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 9.48 |==================================================================
B . 9.92 |=====================================================================
C . 9.42 |==================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 8.85 |=====================================================================
B . 8.72 |====================================================================
C . 8.80 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 12.45 |=================================================================
B . 12.99 |====================================================================
C . 12.44 |=================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 123.85 |===============================================================
B . 131.92 |===================================================================
C . 124.49 |===============================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 7.00 |==================================================================
B . 7.36 |=====================================================================
C . 6.90 |=================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.58 |==================================================================
B . 6.85 |=====================================================================
C . 6.62 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 8.42 |=================================================================
B . 8.93 |=====================================================================
C . 8.50 |==================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 9.99 |================================================================
B . 10.57 |====================================================================
C . 9.79 |===============================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 9.10 |=================================================================
B . 9.71 |=====================================================================
C . 9.13 |=================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 21.88 |====================================================================
B . 21.84 |====================================================================
C . 21.93 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 124.20 |===================================================================
B . 124.64 |===================================================================
C . 124.73 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.97 |=====================================================================
B . 6.91 |====================================================================
C . 6.93 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 9.44 |=====================================================================
B . 9.13 |===================================================================
C . 9.41 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 15.13 |===================================================================
B . 15.27 |====================================================================
C . 15.18 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 17.73 |====================================================================
B . 17.63 |===================================================================
C . 17.81 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 17.24 |====================================================================
B . 17.05 |===================================================================
C . 16.77 |==================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 21.97 |====================================================================
B . 22.09 |====================================================================
C . 21.90 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 123.37 |==================================================================
B . 125.67 |===================================================================
C . 124.01 |==================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.94 |=====================================================================
B . 6.92 |=====================================================================
C . 6.90 |=====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 9.43 |=====================================================================
B . 9.37 |=====================================================================
C . 9.24 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 15.57 |====================================================================
B . 15.33 |===================================================================
C . 15.34 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 18.50 |====================================================================
B . 17.82 |==================================================================
C . 18.23 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 16.89 |=================================================================
B . 16.96 |==================================================================
C . 17.58 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 41.97 |====================================================================
B . 41.69 |====================================================================
C . 41.53 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 123.98 |==================================================================
B . 123.94 |==================================================================
C . 124.96 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 6.880000000 |=============================================================
B . 6.962493428 |==============================================================
C . 6.960000000 |==============================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 21.42 |====================================================================
B . 21.00 |===================================================================
C . 20.95 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 29.40 |==================================================================
B . 30.07 |====================================================================
C . 29.24 |==================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 34.68 |====================================================================
B . 34.70 |====================================================================
C . 34.67 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 35.70 |====================================================================
B . 35.82 |====================================================================
C . 33.70 |================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 41.86 |====================================================================
B . 41.90 |====================================================================
C . 42.09 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 123.97 |==================================================================
B . 125.01 |===================================================================
C . 125.33 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 7.06 |=====================================================================
B . 7.01 |=====================================================================
C . 6.90 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 21.12 |====================================================================
B . 21.05 |====================================================================
C . 21.07 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 29.38 |===================================================================
B . 29.67 |====================================================================
C . 29.46 |====================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 35.06 |====================================================================
B . 34.70 |===================================================================
C . 34.76 |===================================================================
Apache Spark 3.3
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 36.45 |====================================================================
B . 34.61 |=================================================================
C . 35.53 |==================================================================
Dragonflydb 0.6
Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 4219269.32 |===============================================================
B . 4209125.68 |===============================================================
C . 4206479.32 |===============================================================
Dragonflydb 0.6
Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 4524509.15 |===============================================================
B . 4489630.35 |===============================================================
C . 4460778.29 |==============================================================
Dragonflydb 0.6
Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 4159557.48 |===============================================================
B . 4136083.87 |===============================================================
C . 4107472.56 |==============================================================
Dragonflydb 0.6
Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 3994130.34 |===============================================================
B . 3972323.46 |===============================================================
C . 3982880.38 |===============================================================
Dragonflydb 0.6
Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 4208682.77 |===============================================================
B . 4208868.69 |===============================================================
C . 4176068.34 |===============================================================
Dragonflydb 0.6
Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 3881918.88 |===============================================================
B . 3825141.56 |==============================================================
C . 3864893.24 |===============================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 117936.32 |================================================================
B . 118167.76 |================================================================
C . 118067.39 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 0.8 |======================================================================
B . 0.8 |======================================================================
C . 0.8 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 112169.91 |================================================================
B . 111324.98 |================================================================
C . 111437.66 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 0.9 |======================================================================
B . 0.9 |======================================================================
C . 0.9 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 168856.20 |================================================================
B . 168241.77 |================================================================
C . 168534.31 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 5.9 |======================================================================
B . 5.9 |======================================================================
C . 5.9 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 112654.91 |================================================================
B . 112419.09 |================================================================
C . 112565.75 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 0.9 |======================================================================
B . 0.9 |======================================================================
C . 0.9 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 162474.20 |================================================================
B . 163025.22 |================================================================
C . 163135.45 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 6.1 |======================================================================
B . 6.1 |======================================================================
C . 6.1 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 126034.68 |================================================================
B . 126006.70 |================================================================
C . 125808.38 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 7.7 |======================================================================
B . 7.7 |======================================================================
C . 7.7 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 118377.25 |================================================================
B . 118320.30 |================================================================
C . 118167.13 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 0.8 |======================================================================
B . 0.8 |======================================================================
C . 0.8 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 111362.12 |================================================================
B . 111448.46 |================================================================
C . 111365.03 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 0.9 |======================================================================
B . 0.9 |======================================================================
C . 0.9 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 168558.40 |================================================================
B . 168112.89 |================================================================
C . 168376.89 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 5.9 |======================================================================
B . 5.9 |======================================================================
C . 5.9 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 112561.31 |================================================================
B . 112831.39 |================================================================
C . 112498.87 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 0.9 |======================================================================
B . 0.9 |======================================================================
C . 0.9 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 163123.85 |================================================================
B . 163552.13 |================================================================
C . 163558.71 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 6.1 |======================================================================
B . 6.1 |======================================================================
C . 6.1 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 125740.59 |================================================================
B . 125808.66 |================================================================
C . 125868.58 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 7.7 |======================================================================
B . 7.7 |======================================================================
C . 7.7 |======================================================================
memtier_benchmark 1.4
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 2835321.53 |===============================================================
B . 2555526.92 |=========================================================
C . 2476859.81 |=======================================================
memtier_benchmark 1.4
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 2828630.76 |===============================================================
B . 2696467.92 |============================================================
C . 2468655.32 |=======================================================
memtier_benchmark 1.4
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 2540352.24 |===============================================================
B . 2336486.40 |==========================================================
C . 2415948.89 |============================================================
memtier_benchmark 1.4
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 2582100.75 |===============================================================
B . 2511082.41 |=============================================================
C . 2427170.31 |===========================================================
memtier_benchmark 1.4
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 2763821.75 |===============================================================
B . 2649407.05 |============================================================
C . 2679655.73 |=============================================================
memtier_benchmark 1.4
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 2410478.31 |============================================================
B . 2512633.00 |===============================================================
C . 2106869.82 |=====================================================
memtier_benchmark 1.4
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 2773955.34 |=============================================================
B . 2865261.93 |===============================================================
C . 2806199.11 |==============================================================
memtier_benchmark 1.4
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 2550575.11 |======================================================
B . 2602826.18 |=======================================================
C . 2966884.56 |===============================================================
memtier_benchmark 1.4
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 2687075.03 |===================================================
B . 3347517.25 |===============================================================
C . 2738214.13 |====================================================
memtier_benchmark 1.4
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 2416811.03 |============================================================
B . 2536364.42 |===============================================================
C . 2382868.01 |===========================================================
memtier_benchmark 1.4
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 2773074.52 |==============================================================
B . 2773551.23 |==============================================================
C . 2813689.56 |===============================================================
memtier_benchmark 1.4
Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 2688499.75 |=============================================================
B . 2785214.15 |===============================================================
C . 2670507.06 |============================================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 5352183.50 |===============================================================
B . 3822955.75 |=============================================
C . 4344096.50 |===================================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 3555745.75 |===============================================================
B . 3119402.25 |=======================================================
C . 3243652.00 |=========================================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 4243838.0 |================================================================
B . 4223762.0 |================================================================
C . 4248164.5 |================================================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 4457927.00 |===============================================================
B . 2755629.25 |=======================================
C . 2659905.00 |======================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 3638545.75 |=========================================================
B . 3997500.25 |===============================================================
C . 3943910.25 |==============================================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 3388742.50 |===============================================================
B . 2669989.75 |==================================================
C . 3312414.50 |==============================================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 3881387.0 |=========================================================
B . 4364222.5 |================================================================
C . 4293396.5 |===============================================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 5223662.5 |================================================================
B . 2834518.0 |===================================
C . 2617574.0 |================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 2822836.25 |==============================================================
B . 2851816.25 |===============================================================
C . 2718001.00 |============================================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 3875137.25 |=============================================================
B . 3854227.75 |=============================================================
C . 4012269.00 |===============================================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 3502199.0 |================================================================
B . 3273479.5 |============================================================
C . 3246355.0 |===========================================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 2848729.25 |===============================================================
B . 2840960.00 |===============================================================
C . 2747067.50 |=============================================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 2929168.00 |===============================================================
B . 2947470.75 |===============================================================
C . 2168859.75 |==============================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 2844518.25 |=============================================================
B . 2941056.25 |===============================================================
C . 2918397.00 |===============================================================
Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3
Test: Random Fill
Op/s > Higher Is Better
A . 1011444 |==================================================================
B . 995286 |=================================================================
C . 987274 |================================================================
Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3
Test: Random Read
Op/s > Higher Is Better
A . 79117222 |=================================================================
B . 77772723 |================================================================
C . 79085341 |=================================================================
Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3
Test: Update Random
Op/s > Higher Is Better
A . 577444 |==================================================================
B . 572446 |=================================================================
C . 585584 |===================================================================
Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3
Test: Sequential Fill
Op/s > Higher Is Better
A . 1175330 |=================================================================
B . 1163406 |================================================================
C . 1195182 |==================================================================
Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3
Test: Random Fill Sync
Op/s > Higher Is Better
A . 14631 |====================================================================
B . 14659 |====================================================================
C . 14636 |====================================================================
Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3
Test: Read While Writing
Op/s > Higher Is Better
A . 2121137 |===============================================================
B . 2118766 |===============================================================
C . 2215141 |==================================================================
Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3
Test: Read Random Write Random
Op/s > Higher Is Better
A . 2080793 |==================================================================
B . 2081251 |==================================================================
C . 2079557 |==================================================================
Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark
runs/s > Higher Is Better
A . 18.57 |===================================================================
B . 18.89 |====================================================================
C . 18.57 |===================================================================
Unpacking The Linux Kernel 5.19
linux-5.19.tar.xz
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 5.688 |====================================================================
B . 5.699 |====================================================================
C . 5.710 |====================================================================
Redis 7.0.4
Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 3297778.00 |=======================================================
B . 3465545.75 |==========================================================
C . 3752102.50 |===============================================================