12600k sept Intel Core i5-12600K testing with a ASUS PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 (0605 BIOS) and ASUS Intel ADL-S GT1 15GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: Intel Core i5-12600K @ 6.30GHz (10 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 (0605 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0, Graphics: ASUS Intel ADL-S GT1 15GB (1450MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Device 7af0 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc6daily20220716-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 B: Processor: Intel Core i5-12600K @ 6.30GHz (10 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 (0605 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0, Graphics: ASUS Intel ADL-S GT1 15GB (1450MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Device 7af0 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc6daily20220716-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 C: Processor: Intel Core i5-12600K @ 6.30GHz (10 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 (0605 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0, Graphics: ASUS Intel ADL-S GT1 15GB (1450MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC897, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Device 7af0 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc6daily20220716-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better A . 75966 |=================================================================== B . 77477 |==================================================================== C . 77380 |==================================================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better A . 61355 |==================================================================== B . 61210 |==================================================================== C . 59506 |================================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Inference Score Score > Higher Is Better A . 1032 |===================================================================== B . 1029 |===================================================================== C . 1029 |===================================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Training Score Score > Higher Is Better A . 1672 |===================================================================== B . 1673 |===================================================================== C . 1674 |===================================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score Score > Higher Is Better A . 2704 |===================================================================== B . 2702 |===================================================================== C . 2703 |===================================================================== Aircrack-ng 1.7 k/s > Higher Is Better A . 33031.90 |================================================================ B . 33109.84 |================================================================ C . 33749.55 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.69 |============================================================== B . 2.84 |================================================================= C . 3.01 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.17 |=================================================================== B . 124.07 |=================================================================== C . 123.94 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.98 |==================================================================== B . 7.12 |===================================================================== C . 7.00 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.94 |===================================================================== B . 2.84 |================================================================== C . 2.95 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.75 |================================================================ B . 1.88 |===================================================================== C . 1.76 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.41 |==================================================================== B . 1.44 |===================================================================== C . 1.42 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.16 |===================================================================== B . 1.11 |================================================================== C . 1.13 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.89 |==================================================================== B . 2.95 |===================================================================== C . 2.83 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.62 |================================================================== B . 123.54 |================================================================== C . 125.00 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.97 |===================================================================== B . 7.01 |===================================================================== C . 6.99 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3.27 |===================================================================== B . 3.28 |===================================================================== C . 3.23 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.87 |==================================================================== B . 1.90 |===================================================================== C . 1.89 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.44 |=============================================================== B . 1.40 |============================================================== C . 1.57 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.39 |=================================================================== B . 1.44 |===================================================================== C . 1.32 |=============================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3.07 |===================================================================== B . 3.07 |===================================================================== C . 2.98 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.96 |=================================================================== B . 123.00 |================================================================== C . 124.48 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.93 |===================================================================== B . 6.95 |===================================================================== C . 6.97 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3.46 |==================================================================== B . 3.52 |===================================================================== C . 3.48 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.98 |================================================================= B . 2.11 |===================================================================== C . 2.02 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.803054303 |========================================================== B . 1.920000000 |============================================================== C . 1.850000000 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.85 |===================================================================== B . 1.54 |========================================================= C . 1.50 |======================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3.41 |===================================================================== B . 3.38 |==================================================================== C . 3.37 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 122.35 |================================================================== B . 124.03 |=================================================================== C . 124.53 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.00 |===================================================================== B . 6.98 |===================================================================== C . 6.87 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3.78 |===================================================================== B . 3.78 |===================================================================== C . 3.78 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.34 |===================================================================== B . 2.31 |==================================================================== C . 2.34 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.34 |==================================================================== B . 2.36 |===================================================================== C . 2.19 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.02 |===================================================================== B . 1.91 |================================================================= C . 1.99 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 12.43 |==================================================================== B . 12.50 |==================================================================== C . 12.46 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.76 |================================================================== B . 124.09 |================================================================== C . 125.60 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.99 |===================================================================== B . 6.98 |===================================================================== C . 7.00 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.06 |================================================================== B . 6.30 |==================================================================== C . 6.36 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 8.59 |===================================================================== B . 8.40 |=================================================================== C . 8.46 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 10.22 |==================================================================== B . 10.20 |==================================================================== C . 10.06 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 10.08 |=================================================================== B . 10.16 |==================================================================== C . 10.21 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 12.23 |==================================================================== B . 12.03 |=================================================================== C . 11.98 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 122.86 |================================================================== B . 124.13 |=================================================================== C . 124.29 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.97 |===================================================================== B . 6.92 |===================================================================== C . 6.92 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.51 |===================================================================== B . 6.29 |=================================================================== C . 6.39 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.97 |=================================================================== B . 8.24 |===================================================================== C . 8.07 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.28 |===================================================================== B . 8.87 |================================================================== C . 8.91 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 8.86 |=================================================================== B . 9.09 |===================================================================== C . 8.80 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 22.99 |==================================================================== B . 22.98 |==================================================================== C . 23.02 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.35 |================================================================== B . 123.78 |================================================================== C . 124.76 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.01 |===================================================================== B . 6.95 |==================================================================== C . 6.99 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.91 |=================================================================== B . 10.03 |==================================================================== C . 9.61 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 16.08 |==================================================================== B . 16.00 |=================================================================== C . 16.17 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 19.62 |==================================================================== B . 19.21 |================================================================== C . 19.71 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 18.55 |================================================================ B . 19.68 |==================================================================== C . 19.17 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 21.98 |==================================================================== B . 21.60 |=================================================================== C . 21.56 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.32 |=================================================================== B . 123.66 |=================================================================== C . 124.10 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.91 |==================================================================== B . 7.02 |===================================================================== C . 6.90 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.07 |================================================================== B . 9.49 |===================================================================== C . 9.16 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 15.07 |=================================================================== B . 15.30 |==================================================================== C . 15.18 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 17.50 |=================================================================== B . 17.36 |================================================================== C . 17.87 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 16.88 |================================================================ B . 17.88 |==================================================================== C . 16.87 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 41.36 |==================================================================== B . 41.57 |==================================================================== C . 41.35 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.60 |================================================================== B . 123.90 |================================================================== C . 125.16 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.00 |===================================================================== B . 7.01 |===================================================================== C . 6.98 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 24.74 |==================================================================== B . 24.87 |==================================================================== C . 24.86 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 30.17 |================================================================= B . 30.88 |=================================================================== C . 31.51 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 34.20 |================================================================== B . 34.59 |================================================================== C . 35.46 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 33.09 |============================================================== B . 36.21 |==================================================================== C . 34.75 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 42.39 |==================================================================== B . 41.61 |=================================================================== C . 41.62 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.34 |=================================================================== B . 123.44 |=================================================================== C . 124.09 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.96 |===================================================================== B . 6.91 |===================================================================== C . 6.94 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 22.05 |==================================================================== B . 21.80 |=================================================================== C . 21.94 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 30.23 |=================================================================== B . 30.63 |==================================================================== C . 30.67 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 35.39 |==================================================================== B . 35.60 |==================================================================== C . 35.03 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 34.89 |==================================================================== B . 34.21 |=================================================================== C . 34.24 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.95 |================================================================== B . 12.08 |=================================================================== C . 12.23 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.53 |================================================================= B . 129.23 |=================================================================== C . 123.83 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.93 |================================================================== B . 7.30 |===================================================================== C . 6.91 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.399788449 |============================================================== B . 6.370000000 |============================================================== C . 6.330000000 |============================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 8.19 |===================================================================== B . 8.09 |==================================================================== C . 8.15 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.48 |================================================================== B . 9.92 |===================================================================== C . 9.42 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 8.85 |===================================================================== B . 8.72 |==================================================================== C . 8.80 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 12.45 |================================================================= B . 12.99 |==================================================================== C . 12.44 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.85 |=============================================================== B . 131.92 |=================================================================== C . 124.49 |=============================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.00 |================================================================== B . 7.36 |===================================================================== C . 6.90 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.58 |================================================================== B . 6.85 |===================================================================== C . 6.62 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 8.42 |================================================================= B . 8.93 |===================================================================== C . 8.50 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.99 |================================================================ B . 10.57 |==================================================================== C . 9.79 |=============================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.10 |================================================================= B . 9.71 |===================================================================== C . 9.13 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 21.88 |==================================================================== B . 21.84 |==================================================================== C . 21.93 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.20 |=================================================================== B . 124.64 |=================================================================== C . 124.73 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.97 |===================================================================== B . 6.91 |==================================================================== C . 6.93 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.44 |===================================================================== B . 9.13 |=================================================================== C . 9.41 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 15.13 |=================================================================== B . 15.27 |==================================================================== C . 15.18 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 17.73 |==================================================================== B . 17.63 |=================================================================== C . 17.81 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 17.24 |==================================================================== B . 17.05 |=================================================================== C . 16.77 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 21.97 |==================================================================== B . 22.09 |==================================================================== C . 21.90 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.37 |================================================================== B . 125.67 |=================================================================== C . 124.01 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.94 |===================================================================== B . 6.92 |===================================================================== C . 6.90 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.43 |===================================================================== B . 9.37 |===================================================================== C . 9.24 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 15.57 |==================================================================== B . 15.33 |=================================================================== C . 15.34 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 18.50 |==================================================================== B . 17.82 |================================================================== C . 18.23 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 16.89 |================================================================= B . 16.96 |================================================================== C . 17.58 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 41.97 |==================================================================== B . 41.69 |==================================================================== C . 41.53 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.98 |================================================================== B . 123.94 |================================================================== C . 124.96 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.880000000 |============================================================= B . 6.962493428 |============================================================== C . 6.960000000 |============================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 21.42 |==================================================================== B . 21.00 |=================================================================== C . 20.95 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 29.40 |================================================================== B . 30.07 |==================================================================== C . 29.24 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 34.68 |==================================================================== B . 34.70 |==================================================================== C . 34.67 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 35.70 |==================================================================== B . 35.82 |==================================================================== C . 33.70 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 41.86 |==================================================================== B . 41.90 |==================================================================== C . 42.09 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.97 |================================================================== B . 125.01 |=================================================================== C . 125.33 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.06 |===================================================================== B . 7.01 |===================================================================== C . 6.90 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 21.12 |==================================================================== B . 21.05 |==================================================================== C . 21.07 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 29.38 |=================================================================== B . 29.67 |==================================================================== C . 29.46 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 35.06 |==================================================================== B . 34.70 |=================================================================== C . 34.76 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 36.45 |==================================================================== B . 34.61 |================================================================= C . 35.53 |================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Fast MT/s > Higher Is Better A . 160.13 |=================================================================== B . 160.03 |=================================================================== C . 160.06 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Medium MT/s > Higher Is Better A . 60.85 |==================================================================== B . 60.87 |==================================================================== C . 60.89 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Thorough MT/s > Higher Is Better A . 7.9430 |=================================================================== B . 7.9426 |=================================================================== C . 7.9396 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Exhaustive MT/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.7483 |=================================================================== B . 0.7482 |=================================================================== C . 0.7486 |=================================================================== Blender 3.3 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 107.38 |=================================================================== B . 107.60 |=================================================================== C . 107.26 |=================================================================== Blender 3.3 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 303.34 |=================================================================== B . 303.25 |=================================================================== C . 303.35 |=================================================================== Blender 3.3 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 154.91 |=================================================================== B . 154.74 |=================================================================== C . 155.23 |=================================================================== Blender 3.3 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1242.71 |================================================================== B . 1241.97 |================================================================== C . 1242.78 |================================================================== Blender 3.3 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 377.04 |=================================================================== B . 377.70 |=================================================================== C . 378.41 |=================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.32.6 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better A . 206019 |=================================================================== B . 205796 |=================================================================== C . 205167 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz shuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 16672.5 |================================================================= B . 16992.7 |================================================================== C . 17013.4 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz bitshuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 8941.5 |================================================================= B . 9258.0 |=================================================================== C . 9257.1 |=================================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 4219269.32 |=============================================================== B . 4209125.68 |=============================================================== C . 4206479.32 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 4524509.15 |=============================================================== B . 4489630.35 |=============================================================== C . 4460778.29 |============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 4159557.48 |=============================================================== B . 4136083.87 |=============================================================== C . 4107472.56 |============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 3994130.34 |=============================================================== B . 3972323.46 |=============================================================== C . 3982880.38 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 4208682.77 |=============================================================== B . 4208868.69 |=============================================================== C . 4176068.34 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 3881918.88 |=============================================================== B . 3825141.56 |============================================================== C . 3864893.24 |=============================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 117936.32 |================================================================ B . 118167.76 |================================================================ C . 118067.39 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.8 |====================================================================== B . 0.8 |====================================================================== C . 0.8 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 112169.91 |================================================================ B . 111324.98 |================================================================ C . 111437.66 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.9 |====================================================================== B . 0.9 |====================================================================== C . 0.9 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 168856.20 |================================================================ B . 168241.77 |================================================================ C . 168534.31 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.9 |====================================================================== B . 5.9 |====================================================================== C . 5.9 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 112654.91 |================================================================ B . 112419.09 |================================================================ C . 112565.75 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.9 |====================================================================== B . 0.9 |====================================================================== C . 0.9 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 162474.20 |================================================================ B . 163025.22 |================================================================ C . 163135.45 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 6.1 |====================================================================== B . 6.1 |====================================================================== C . 6.1 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 126034.68 |================================================================ B . 126006.70 |================================================================ C . 125808.38 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 7.7 |====================================================================== B . 7.7 |====================================================================== C . 7.7 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 118377.25 |================================================================ B . 118320.30 |================================================================ C . 118167.13 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.8 |====================================================================== B . 0.8 |====================================================================== C . 0.8 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 111362.12 |================================================================ B . 111448.46 |================================================================ C . 111365.03 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.9 |====================================================================== B . 0.9 |====================================================================== C . 0.9 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 168558.40 |================================================================ B . 168112.89 |================================================================ C . 168376.89 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.9 |====================================================================== B . 5.9 |====================================================================== C . 5.9 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 112561.31 |================================================================ B . 112831.39 |================================================================ C . 112498.87 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.9 |====================================================================== B . 0.9 |====================================================================== C . 0.9 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 163123.85 |================================================================ B . 163552.13 |================================================================ C . 163558.71 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 6.1 |====================================================================== B . 6.1 |====================================================================== C . 6.1 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 125740.59 |================================================================ B . 125808.66 |================================================================ C . 125868.58 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 7.7 |====================================================================== B . 7.7 |====================================================================== C . 7.7 |====================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 1011444 |================================================================== B . 995286 |================================================================= C . 987274 |================================================================ Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 79117222 |================================================================= B . 77772723 |================================================================ C . 79085341 |================================================================= Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 577444 |================================================================== B . 572446 |================================================================= C . 585584 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 1175330 |================================================================= B . 1163406 |================================================================ C . 1195182 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 14631 |==================================================================== B . 14659 |==================================================================== C . 14636 |==================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 2121137 |=============================================================== B . 2118766 |=============================================================== C . 2215141 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 2080793 |================================================================== B . 2081251 |================================================================== C . 2079557 |================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 567 |===================================================================== B . 573 |====================================================================== C . 575 |====================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 1171 |================================================================== B . 1210 |===================================================================== C . 1217 |===================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 166 |===================================================================== B . 168 |====================================================================== C . 167 |====================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 270 |===================================================================== B . 272 |====================================================================== C . 272 |====================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 1148 |==================================================================== B . 1165 |===================================================================== C . 1163 |===================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 316 |===================================================================== B . 319 |====================================================================== C . 317 |====================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 1190 |================================================================== B . 1239 |===================================================================== C . 1242 |===================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: 20k Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better A . 5.196 |==================================================================== B . 5.207 |==================================================================== C . 5.227 |==================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better A . 5.825 |==================================================================== B . 5.695 |================================================================== C . 5.862 |==================================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2835321.53 |=============================================================== B . 2555526.92 |========================================================= C . 2476859.81 |======================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2828630.76 |=============================================================== B . 2696467.92 |============================================================ C . 2468655.32 |======================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2540352.24 |=============================================================== B . 2336486.40 |========================================================== C . 2415948.89 |============================================================ memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2582100.75 |=============================================================== B . 2511082.41 |============================================================= C . 2427170.31 |=========================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2763821.75 |=============================================================== B . 2649407.05 |============================================================ C . 2679655.73 |============================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2410478.31 |============================================================ B . 2512633.00 |=============================================================== C . 2106869.82 |===================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2773955.34 |============================================================= B . 2865261.93 |=============================================================== C . 2806199.11 |============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2550575.11 |====================================================== B . 2602826.18 |======================================================= C . 2966884.56 |=============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2687075.03 |=================================================== B . 3347517.25 |=============================================================== C . 2738214.13 |==================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2416811.03 |============================================================ B . 2536364.42 |=============================================================== C . 2382868.01 |=========================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2773074.52 |============================================================== B . 2773551.23 |============================================================== C . 2813689.56 |=============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2688499.75 |============================================================= B . 2785214.15 |=============================================================== C . 2670507.06 |============================================================ Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: nasnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 9.296 |=================================================================== B . 9.287 |=================================================================== C . 9.375 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: mobilenetV3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.206 |=================================================================== B . 1.200 |=================================================================== C . 1.216 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: squeezenetv1.1 ms < Lower Is Better A . 3.058 |==================================================================== B . 2.657 |=========================================================== C . 3.051 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better A . 20.05 |============================================================== B . 20.30 |=============================================================== C . 21.97 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.095 |==================================================================== B . 4.928 |================================================================== C . 5.049 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.394 |================================================================== B . 2.408 |================================================================== C . 2.470 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.454 |==================================================================== B . 2.428 |=================================================================== C . 2.444 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 26.70 |==================================================================== B . 26.70 |==================================================================== C . 26.27 |=================================================================== Natron 2.4.3 Input: Spaceship FPS > Higher Is Better A . 3.6 |====================================================================== B . 3.6 |====================================================================== C . 3.5 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better A . 11.16 |============================================================== B . 12.31 |==================================================================== C . 11.64 |================================================================ NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 3.46 |================================================================= B . 3.66 |===================================================================== C . 3.49 |================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.79 |================================================================== B . 2.90 |===================================================================== C . 2.83 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 3.14 |===================================================================== B . 3.06 |=================================================================== C . 3.09 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 3.00 |==================================================================== B . 3.04 |===================================================================== C . 3.02 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.44 |===================================================================== B . 5.44 |===================================================================== C . 5.41 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.02 |===================================================================== B . 1.02 |===================================================================== C . 1.02 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better A . 9.22 |=================================================================== B . 9.16 |================================================================== C . 9.53 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better A . 37.96 |==================================================================== B . 37.99 |==================================================================== C . 38.14 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better A . 7.51 |===================================================================== B . 7.41 |==================================================================== C . 7.40 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.77 |===================================================================== B . 5.76 |===================================================================== C . 5.73 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better A . 14.37 |=================================================================== B . 14.40 |=================================================================== C . 14.57 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better A . 19.86 |==================================================================== B . 20.00 |==================================================================== C . 19.20 |================================================================= NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better A . 13.40 |=================================================================== B . 13.60 |==================================================================== C . 13.31 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better A . 8.61 |===================================================================== B . 8.61 |===================================================================== C . 8.63 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: vision_transformer ms < Lower Is Better A . 204.96 |============================================================== B . 204.75 |============================================================== C . 221.23 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: FastestDet ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.07 |============================================================ B . 4.03 |============================================================ C . 4.67 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better A . 482.96 |=================================================================== B . 483.87 |=================================================================== C . 481.76 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 150.34 |=================================================================== B . 150.56 |=================================================================== C . 150.22 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 139.49 |=================================================================== B . 139.27 |=================================================================== C . 138.77 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 79.04 |==================================================================== B . 79.41 |==================================================================== C . 79.43 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 157.20 |=================================================================== B . 157.30 |=================================================================== C . 156.92 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 257.97 |================================================================== B . 260.09 |=================================================================== C . 259.64 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better A . 32.23 |==================================================================== B . 32.29 |==================================================================== C . 32.21 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better A . 405.89 |=================================================================== B . 405.86 |=================================================================== C . 405.42 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better A . 1906.45 |================================================================== B . 1903.62 |================================================================== C . 1896.06 |================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better A . 364.07 |=================================================================== B . 365.00 |=================================================================== C . 364.29 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 377.29 |================================================================== B . 381.28 |=================================================================== C . 377.61 |================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better A . 940.23 |================================================================== B . 940.99 |================================================================== C . 950.14 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better A . 622.75 |=================================================================== B . 627.21 |=================================================================== C . 623.95 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better A . 365.93 |=================================================================== B . 366.55 |=================================================================== C . 365.07 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better A . 188.61 |=================================================================== B . 189.02 |=================================================================== C . 188.96 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vision_transformer ms < Lower Is Better A . 5945.17 |================================================================== B . 5943.47 |================================================================== C . 5956.11 |================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: FastestDet ms < Lower Is Better A . 79.40 |==================================================================== B . 79.21 |==================================================================== C . 78.85 |==================================================================== Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better A . 18.57 |=================================================================== B . 18.89 |==================================================================== C . 18.57 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 2.28 |===================================================================== B . 2.28 |===================================================================== C . 2.28 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 1730.06 |================================================================== B . 1734.99 |================================================================== C . 1736.86 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 1.74 |===================================================================== B . 1.74 |===================================================================== C . 1.74 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 2257.35 |================================================================== B . 2255.03 |================================================================== C . 2256.98 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 1.74 |===================================================================== B . 1.75 |===================================================================== C . 1.74 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 2257.15 |================================================================== B . 2252.28 |================================================================== C . 2255.20 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 205.21 |================================================================== B . 206.79 |=================================================================== C . 204.23 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 19.48 |==================================================================== B . 19.33 |=================================================================== C . 19.57 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 10.07 |==================================================================== B . 10.06 |==================================================================== C . 10.06 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 395.54 |=================================================================== B . 395.59 |=================================================================== C . 395.44 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 462.34 |=================================================================== B . 463.70 |=================================================================== C . 463.87 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 8.64 |===================================================================== B . 8.61 |===================================================================== C . 8.61 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 278.74 |=================================================================== B . 192.88 |============================================== C . 193.22 |============================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 14.34 |=================== B . 51.76 |==================================================================== C . 51.71 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 31.28 |==================================================================== B . 31.37 |==================================================================== C . 31.43 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 127.81 |=================================================================== B . 127.36 |=================================================================== C . 127.17 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 754.73 |=================================================================== B . 742.81 |================================================================== C . 741.97 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 13.16 |=================================================================== B . 13.38 |==================================================================== C . 13.39 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 361.68 |=================================================================== B . 359.57 |=================================================================== C . 360.51 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 11.05 |==================================================================== B . 11.11 |==================================================================== C . 11.08 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 5175.16 |================================================================== B . 5129.86 |================================================================= C . 5136.99 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.84 |==================================================================== B . 1.86 |===================================================================== C . 1.85 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 13292.83 |================================================================= B . 13347.46 |================================================================= C . 13357.94 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.74 |===================================================================== B . 0.74 |===================================================================== C . 0.74 |===================================================================== Primesieve 8.0 Length: 1e12 Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 20.22 |==================================================================== B . 20.29 |==================================================================== C . 20.21 |==================================================================== Primesieve 8.0 Length: 1e13 Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 236.72 |=================================================================== B . 235.76 |=================================================================== C . 236.41 |=================================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 5352183.50 |=============================================================== B . 3822955.75 |============================================= C . 4344096.50 |=================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3555745.75 |=============================================================== B . 3119402.25 |======================================================= C . 3243652.00 |========================================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 4243838.0 |================================================================ B . 4223762.0 |================================================================ C . 4248164.5 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 4457927.00 |=============================================================== B . 2755629.25 |======================================= C . 2659905.00 |====================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3638545.75 |========================================================= B . 3997500.25 |=============================================================== C . 3943910.25 |============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3388742.50 |=============================================================== B . 2669989.75 |================================================== C . 3312414.50 |============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3881387.0 |========================================================= B . 4364222.5 |================================================================ C . 4293396.5 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 5223662.5 |================================================================ B . 2834518.0 |=================================== C . 2617574.0 |================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2822836.25 |============================================================== B . 2851816.25 |=============================================================== C . 2718001.00 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3875137.25 |============================================================= B . 3854227.75 |============================================================= C . 4012269.00 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3502199.0 |================================================================ B . 3273479.5 |============================================================ C . 3246355.0 |=========================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2848729.25 |=============================================================== B . 2840960.00 |=============================================================== C . 2747067.50 |============================================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2929168.00 |=============================================================== B . 2947470.75 |=============================================================== C . 2168859.75 |============================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3297778.00 |======================================================= B . 3465545.75 |========================================================== C . 3752102.50 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2844518.25 |============================================================= B . 2941056.25 |=============================================================== C . 2918397.00 |=============================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: OFDM_Test Samples / Second > Higher Is Better A . 168600000 |========================================================== B . 183000000 |=============================================================== C . 185500000 |================================================================ srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 523.5 |=================================================================== B . 527.8 |==================================================================== C . 521.2 |=================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 151.0 |==================================================================== B . 151.6 |==================================================================== C . 151.4 |==================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 541.2 |==================================================================== B . 537.6 |==================================================================== C . 534.7 |=================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 191.5 |==================================================================== B . 191.2 |==================================================================== C . 189.6 |=================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 581.7 |==================================================================== B . 578.8 |==================================================================== C . 578.7 |==================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 172.6 |==================================================================== B . 172.9 |==================================================================== C . 173.2 |==================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 594.7 |==================================================================== B . 590.7 |==================================================================== C . 587.8 |=================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 209.8 |==================================================================== B . 209.6 |==================================================================== C . 209.7 |==================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 189.4 |==================================================================== B . 189.3 |==================================================================== C . 188.4 |==================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 88 |======================================================================= B . 88 |======================================================================= C . 87 |====================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2.030 |==================================================================== B . 2.016 |==================================================================== C . 2.020 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 43.53 |=================================================================== B . 43.71 |==================================================================== C . 43.96 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 10 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 85.52 |================================================================== B . 86.53 |================================================================== C . 88.56 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 121.73 |================================================================ B . 127.04 |=================================================================== C . 125.22 |================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 6.359 |==================================================================== B . 6.359 |==================================================================== C . 6.344 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 119.55 |================================================================== B . 120.54 |=================================================================== C . 118.97 |================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 260.88 |================================================================== B . 260.78 |================================================================== C . 265.94 |=================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 441.12 |================================================================= B . 446.14 |================================================================= C . 457.51 |=================================================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 15.51 |==================================================================== B . 15.49 |==================================================================== C . 15.40 |==================================================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 199.39 |=================================================================== B . 199.79 |=================================================================== C . 200.43 |=================================================================== Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 87.70 |=================================================================== B . 88.06 |==================================================================== C . 88.37 |==================================================================== Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 527.01 |=================================================================== B . 526.99 |=================================================================== C . 528.23 |=================================================================== Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 52.95 |==================================================================== B . 53.01 |==================================================================== C . 52.89 |==================================================================== Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 51.86 |==================================================================== B . 51.60 |==================================================================== C . 51.76 |==================================================================== Unpacking The Linux Kernel 5.19 linux-5.19.tar.xz Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 5.688 |==================================================================== B . 5.699 |==================================================================== C . 5.710 |==================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 223.9 |==================================================================== B . 222.6 |==================================================================== C . 221.4 |=================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 204.4 |==================================================================== B . 205.6 |==================================================================== C . 203.9 |=================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 137.2 |==================================================================== B . 136.7 |==================================================================== C . 136.5 |==================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 66.4 |===================================================================== B . 66.4 |===================================================================== C . 66.4 |===================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 114.0 |==================================================================== B . 114.1 |==================================================================== C . 114.0 |==================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 105.7 |==================================================================== B . 105.7 |==================================================================== C . 105.8 |==================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 73.8 |===================================================================== B . 73.7 |===================================================================== C . 73.7 |===================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 39.4 |===================================================================== B . 39.4 |===================================================================== C . 39.3 |===================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 267.8 |==================================================================== B . 267.1 |==================================================================== C . 263.3 |=================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Effects Quality: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 243.7 |==================================================================== B . 245.2 |==================================================================== C . 244.7 |==================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 163.7 |==================================================================== B . 163.0 |==================================================================== C . 162.8 |==================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 79.5 |===================================================================== B . 79.6 |===================================================================== C . 79.6 |=====================================================================