3900X Seppy AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS) and MSI AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: MX279, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.6 (LLVM 12.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 9.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: MX279, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.6 (LLVM 12.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 9.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: MX279, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.6 (LLVM 12.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 9.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Unpacking The Linux Kernel 5.19 linux-5.19.tar.xz Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.004 |================================================================== B . 7.260 |==================================================================== C . 6.963 |================================================================= GravityMark 1.70 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 69.6 |==================================================================== B . 70.1 |===================================================================== C . 70.2 |===================================================================== GravityMark 1.70 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: Vulkan Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 66.8 |===================================================================== B . 66.9 |===================================================================== C . 66.5 |===================================================================== GravityMark 1.70 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGL ES Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 50.3 |===================================================================== B . 50.3 |===================================================================== C . 50.4 |===================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 320.4 |==================================================================== B . 319.2 |==================================================================== C . 319.8 |==================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 314.9 |================================================================== B . 318.8 |=================================================================== C . 324.6 |==================================================================== Unvanquished 0.53 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 328.1 |==================================================================== B . 324.9 |=================================================================== C . 324.2 |=================================================================== Xonotic 0.8.5 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 536.84 |================================================================== B . 542.64 |=================================================================== C . 544.70 |=================================================================== Xonotic 0.8.5 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 449.79 |=================================================================== B . 452.75 |=================================================================== C . 450.63 |=================================================================== Xonotic 0.8.5 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 412.50 |================================================================= B . 419.58 |=================================================================== C . 422.19 |=================================================================== Xonotic 0.8.5 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 307.84 |================================================================== B . 310.66 |=================================================================== C . 309.09 |=================================================================== C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz shuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 16249.2 |=============================================================== B . 16778.8 |================================================================= C . 16951.6 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz bitshuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 9647.4 |=============================================================== B . 10159.0 |================================================================== C . 9980.1 |================================================================= LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: 20k Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better A . 8.291 |==================================================================== B . 8.277 |==================================================================== C . 8.267 |==================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better A . 8.285 |==================================================================== B . 8.180 |=================================================================== C . 7.983 |================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: OFDM_Test Samples / Second > Higher Is Better A . 129100000 |================================================================ B . 129300000 |================================================================ C . 122300000 |============================================================= srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 347.3 |================================================================ B . 367.4 |==================================================================== C . 364.6 |=================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 142.7 |================================================================ B . 150.9 |==================================================================== C . 149.4 |=================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 368.1 |=================================================================== B . 371.7 |==================================================================== C . 368.7 |=================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 164.6 |==================================================================== B . 163.9 |==================================================================== C . 162.9 |=================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 389.2 |=================================================================== B . 394.7 |==================================================================== C . 375.2 |================================================================= srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 158.6 |=================================================================== B . 161.5 |==================================================================== C . 153.6 |================================================================= srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 402.7 |==================================================================== B . 398.5 |=================================================================== C . 402.7 |==================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 175.4 |==================================================================== B . 174.1 |=================================================================== C . 175.0 |==================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM eNb Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 111.1 |==================================================================== B . 109.8 |=================================================================== C . 109.8 |=================================================================== srsRAN 22.04.1 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM UE Mb/s > Higher Is Better A . 61.6 |===================================================================== B . 60.9 |==================================================================== C . 60.8 |==================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 642 |==================================================================== B . 656 |====================================================================== C . 658 |====================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 687 |============================================================== B . 765 |====================================================================== C . 770 |====================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 182 |====================================================================== B . 183 |====================================================================== C . 183 |====================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 291 |===================================================================== B . 293 |====================================================================== C . 294 |====================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 1379 |=================================================================== B . 1416 |===================================================================== C . 1424 |===================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 352 |==================================================================== B . 360 |====================================================================== C . 362 |====================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 1249 |============================================================= B . 1389 |==================================================================== C . 1414 |===================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1.845 |==================================================================== B . 1.851 |==================================================================== C . 1.858 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 39.72 |================================================================= B . 41.27 |==================================================================== C . 40.93 |=================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 10 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 70.77 |================================================================= B . 73.88 |==================================================================== C . 73.14 |=================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 94.64 |=============================================================== B . 100.51 |=================================================================== C . 100.77 |=================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 5.339 |=================================================================== B . 5.415 |==================================================================== C . 5.363 |=================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 105.22 |================================================================== B . 105.80 |================================================================== C . 106.69 |=================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 220.14 |================================================================== B . 222.51 |=================================================================== C . 223.22 |=================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.2 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 329.43 |================================================================ B . 346.25 |=================================================================== C . 339.68 |================================================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better A . 85631 |=================================================================== B . 87122 |==================================================================== C . 86779 |==================================================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better A . 88576 |==================================================================== B . 88624 |==================================================================== C . 88089 |==================================================================== Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 469.42 |=================================================================== B . 468.68 |=================================================================== C . 468.81 |=================================================================== Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 59.58 |==================================================================== B . 59.61 |==================================================================== C . 59.53 |==================================================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 18.83 |=================================================================== B . 18.82 |=================================================================== C . 18.98 |==================================================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 309.97 |================================================================== B . 311.96 |=================================================================== C . 313.75 |=================================================================== Primesieve 8.0 Length: 1e12 Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 14.67 |==================================================================== B . 14.64 |==================================================================== C . 14.70 |==================================================================== Primesieve 8.0 Length: 1e13 Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 185.42 |=================================================================== B . 185.62 |=================================================================== C . 185.91 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 10233 |==================================================================== B . 10231 |==================================================================== C . 10295 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 10532 |==================================================================== B . 10495 |==================================================================== C . 10556 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 12209 |==================================================================== B . 12200 |==================================================================== C . 12221 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 169810 |=================================================================== B . 169368 |=================================================================== C . 169662 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 333972 |=================================================================== B . 334350 |=================================================================== C . 334546 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 174430 |=================================================================== B . 173423 |=================================================================== C . 173925 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 342152 |=================================================================== B . 341210 |=================================================================== C . 341165 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 201629 |=================================================================== B . 201249 |=================================================================== C . 201634 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 397802 |=================================================================== B . 397000 |=================================================================== C . 397232 |=================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 2583 |===================================================================== B . 2581 |===================================================================== C . 2594 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 2647 |===================================================================== B . 2649 |===================================================================== C . 2655 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 3090 |===================================================================== B . 3080 |===================================================================== C . 3088 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 41284 |==================================================================== B . 40995 |==================================================================== C . 41236 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 88798 |==================================================================== B . 88008 |=================================================================== C . 88501 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 42208 |==================================================================== B . 42159 |==================================================================== C . 42363 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 90100 |==================================================================== B . 90160 |==================================================================== C . 90458 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 49131 |==================================================================== B . 49075 |==================================================================== C . 49226 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better A . 104130 |=================================================================== B . 104140 |=================================================================== C . 104486 |=================================================================== Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 100.82 |================================================================= B . 102.61 |=================================================================== C . 103.29 |=================================================================== Aircrack-ng 1.7 k/s > Higher Is Better A . 43713.72 |================================================================= B . 43775.77 |================================================================= C . 43668.87 |================================================================= Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better A . 11.63 |================================================================== B . 11.58 |================================================================== C . 11.94 |==================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3.70 |===================================================================== B . 3.60 |=================================================================== C . 3.48 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 121.40 |================================================================== B . 121.55 |================================================================== C . 122.65 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.56 |===================================================================== B . 7.50 |==================================================================== C . 7.57 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3.99 |================================================================ B . 4.28 |===================================================================== C . 4.25 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.84 |===================================================================== B . 1.77 |================================================================== C . 1.75 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.85 |================================================================== B . 1.94 |===================================================================== C . 1.70 |============================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.57 |==================================================================== B . 1.59 |===================================================================== C . 1.58 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3.99 |===================================================================== B . 3.86 |=================================================================== C . 3.80 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.24 |=================================================================== B . 124.12 |=================================================================== C . 124.19 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.61 |===================================================================== B . 7.60 |===================================================================== C . 7.61 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 4.48 |===================================================================== B . 4.16 |================================================================ C . 4.25 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.05 |===================================================================== B . 1.95 |================================================================== C . 1.93 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.84 |============================================================= B . 1.97 |================================================================== C . 2.07 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.70 |==================================================================== B . 1.72 |===================================================================== C . 1.58 |=============================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 4.18 |===================================================================== B . 3.97 |================================================================= C . 4.21 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.45 |=================================================================== B . 123.73 |=================================================================== C . 123.18 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.66 |===================================================================== B . 7.58 |==================================================================== C . 7.64 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 4.39 |================================================================== B . 4.56 |===================================================================== C . 4.46 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.23 |================================================================= B . 2.35 |===================================================================== C . 2.19 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.55 |===================================================================== B . 2.55 |===================================================================== C . 2.48 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.09 |===================================================================== B . 1.93 |================================================================ C . 2.05 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 4.40 |===================================================================== B . 4.42 |===================================================================== C . 4.30 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.29 |=================================================================== B . 123.33 |================================================================== C . 124.28 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.58 |===================================================================== B . 7.53 |==================================================================== C . 7.59 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 5.04 |===================================================================== B . 4.98 |==================================================================== C . 5.03 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.83 |===================================================================== B . 2.76 |=================================================================== C . 2.76 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3.14 |================================================================== B . 3.17 |=================================================================== C . 3.26 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.90 |===================================================================== B . 2.51 |============================================================ C . 2.63 |=============================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 17.58 |==================================================================== B . 17.07 |================================================================== C . 17.35 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.63 |=================================================================== B . 124.66 |=================================================================== C . 124.28 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.60 |===================================================================== B . 7.58 |===================================================================== C . 7.61 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 8.32 |===================================================================== B . 8.30 |===================================================================== C . 7.88 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 10.60 |==================================================================== B . 10.46 |=================================================================== C . 10.32 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 13.09 |==================================================================== B . 12.28 |================================================================ C . 12.35 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 13.90 |==================================================================== B . 12.84 |=============================================================== C . 13.16 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 16.41 |==================================================================== B . 16.23 |=================================================================== C . 16.31 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.74 |=================================================================== B . 123.91 |=================================================================== C . 124.04 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.56 |===================================================================== B . 7.55 |===================================================================== C . 7.60 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.71 |===================================================================== B . 7.67 |===================================================================== C . 7.62 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.970000000 |============================================================ B . 10.020000000 |============================================================= C . 10.070926909 |============================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.98 |=================================================================== B . 12.09 |==================================================================== C . 11.59 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.53 |=================================================================== B . 11.68 |==================================================================== C . 11.01 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 32.60 |==================================================================== B . 31.42 |================================================================== C . 32.52 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.54 |================================================================== B . 123.68 |=================================================================== C . 124.53 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.64 |===================================================================== B . 7.56 |==================================================================== C . 7.56 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 12.88 |==================================================================== B . 12.19 |================================================================ C . 12.46 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 21.59 |=================================================================== B . 21.62 |=================================================================== C . 21.84 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 25.79 |================================================================= B . 26.79 |==================================================================== C . 25.43 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 26.34 |==================================================================== B . 25.13 |================================================================= C . 25.57 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 32.12 |==================================================================== B . 32.07 |==================================================================== C . 32.05 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.86 |=================================================================== B . 124.33 |=================================================================== C . 124.78 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.58 |==================================================================== B . 7.61 |===================================================================== C . 7.64 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 13.28 |==================================================================== B . 12.84 |================================================================== C . 13.03 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 21.72 |==================================================================== B . 21.46 |=================================================================== C . 20.34 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 25.86 |==================================================================== B . 25.93 |==================================================================== C . 24.16 |=============================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 25.89 |==================================================================== B . 25.90 |==================================================================== C . 23.51 |============================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 63.09 |==================================================================== B . 63.12 |==================================================================== C . 62.74 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.89 |=================================================================== B . 124.12 |=================================================================== C . 124.69 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.65 |===================================================================== B . 7.57 |==================================================================== C . 7.63 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 35.63 |==================================================================== B . 35.21 |=================================================================== C . 35.15 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 42.37 |==================================================================== B . 42.40 |==================================================================== C . 42.65 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 51.48 |==================================================================== B . 50.07 |================================================================== C . 51.67 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 50.36 |==================================================================== B . 50.15 |==================================================================== C . 49.30 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 57.33 |=================================================================== B . 57.68 |==================================================================== C . 57.79 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.32 |=================================================================== B . 123.67 |================================================================== C . 124.77 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.57 |==================================================================== B . 7.62 |===================================================================== C . 7.64 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 30.66 |================================================================== B . 31.58 |==================================================================== C . 31.26 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 40.06 |==================================================================== B . 39.72 |=================================================================== C . 39.50 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 46.55 |==================================================================== B . 46.43 |==================================================================== C . 46.07 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 45.31 |==================================================================== B . 45.42 |==================================================================== C . 44.52 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 16.65 |==================================================================== B . 16.45 |=================================================================== C . 16.25 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.08 |=================================================================== B . 124.04 |=================================================================== C . 123.66 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.61 |==================================================================== B . 7.67 |===================================================================== C . 7.60 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 8.17 |===================================================================== B . 8.05 |==================================================================== C . 7.89 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 10.30 |==================================================================== B . 10.01 |================================================================== C . 10.30 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 12.00 |=================================================================== B . 11.61 |================================================================= C . 12.17 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.24 |=================================================================== B . 11.42 |==================================================================== C . 11.28 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 16.92 |==================================================================== B . 16.98 |==================================================================== C . 16.95 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 123.64 |=================================================================== B . 123.47 |================================================================== C . 124.53 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.65 |===================================================================== B . 7.63 |===================================================================== C . 7.58 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 8.42 |=================================================================== B . 8.37 |=================================================================== C . 8.64 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 10.69 |==================================================================== B . 10.67 |==================================================================== C . 10.55 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 13.65 |==================================================================== B . 13.11 |================================================================= C . 12.81 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 12.37 |==================================================================== B . 11.73 |================================================================ C . 11.39 |=============================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 30.58 |==================================================================== B . 29.67 |================================================================== C . 29.67 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.25 |=================================================================== B . 124.89 |=================================================================== C . 123.95 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.60 |===================================================================== B . 7.54 |==================================================================== C . 7.61 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.75 |==================================================================== B . 11.49 |================================================================== C . 11.49 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 19.94 |=================================================================== B . 20.17 |==================================================================== C . 20.01 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 23.65 |==================================================================== B . 22.74 |================================================================= C . 22.57 |================================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 23.60 |==================================================================== B . 22.73 |================================================================= C . 21.93 |=============================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 31.53 |==================================================================== B . 31.25 |=================================================================== C . 31.51 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.38 |=================================================================== B . 125.06 |=================================================================== C . 124.69 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.62 |===================================================================== B . 7.61 |===================================================================== C . 7.59 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.92 |=============================================================== B . 12.09 |================================================================ C . 12.92 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 19.96 |================================================================= B . 20.76 |==================================================================== C . 20.64 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 24.28 |================================================================== B . 24.13 |================================================================== C . 24.86 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 22.84 |================================================================== B . 22.49 |================================================================= C . 23.58 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 59.06 |==================================================================== B . 58.94 |==================================================================== C . 58.69 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.56 |=================================================================== B . 123.60 |================================================================== C . 124.71 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.59 |===================================================================== B . 7.55 |===================================================================== C . 7.54 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 27.06 |========================================================== B . 31.55 |==================================================================== C . 27.23 |=========================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 39.70 |=================================================================== B . 40.00 |=================================================================== C . 40.47 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 45.30 |================================================================= B . 47.06 |==================================================================== C . 44.59 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 46.51 |=================================================================== B . 47.26 |==================================================================== C . 46.22 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 58.24 |================================================================ B . 59.38 |================================================================= C . 61.92 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 124.59 |=================================================================== B . 124.38 |=================================================================== C . 124.46 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.67 |===================================================================== B . 7.54 |==================================================================== C . 7.62 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 26.86 |==================================================================== B . 25.63 |================================================================= C . 26.09 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 40.00 |=================================================================== B . 40.34 |==================================================================== C . 39.44 |================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 47.58 |==================================================================== B . 47.02 |=================================================================== C . 44.90 |================================================================ Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 46.73 |==================================================================== B . 45.91 |=================================================================== C . 45.90 |=================================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2571296.09 |=============================================================== B . 2530290.29 |============================================================== C . 2549487.54 |============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2782190.43 |============================================================== B . 2805869.83 |=============================================================== C . 2763256.98 |============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2467506.49 |=============================================================== B . 2450502.69 |=============================================================== C . 2444018.25 |============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2435286.83 |=============================================================== B . 2432286.97 |=============================================================== C . 2423383.45 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2594626.13 |=============================================================== B . 2603169.20 |=============================================================== C . 2611028.59 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 2326752.52 |=============================================================== B . 2342872.52 |=============================================================== C . 2329272.97 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2300790.75 |=============================================================== B . 1980782.62 |====================================================== C . 2029142.25 |======================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1475997.62 |========================================================== B . 1604856.12 |=============================================================== C . 1574484.25 |============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1963578.00 |============================================================== B . 1992385.00 |=============================================================== C . 1952244.88 |============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2348967.00 |=============================================================== B . 1278828.00 |================================== C . 1380363.25 |===================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1886028.50 |=============================================================== B . 1733906.50 |========================================================== C . 1745999.38 |========================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1453979.38 |========================================================== B . 1496450.50 |============================================================ C . 1568311.12 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2013854.62 |=============================================================== B . 2024809.38 |=============================================================== C . 1993837.12 |============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2278568.00 |=============================================================== B . 1386256.75 |====================================== C . 1390922.88 |====================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1454759.12 |============================================================== B . 1479037.62 |=============================================================== C . 1406495.00 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1818545.00 |=============================================================== B . 1797623.38 |============================================================== C . 1822522.25 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1586963.25 |=============================================================== B . 1586804.12 |=============================================================== C . 1545873.75 |============================================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1342933.62 |============================================================== B . 1357810.00 |=============================================================== C . 1363517.50 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1412551.50 |=============================================================== B . 1395701.88 |============================================================== C . 1401205.62 |============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1812210.12 |============================================================= B . 1812301.38 |============================================================= C . 1865566.62 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1383954.75 |============================================================== B . 1415616.50 |=============================================================== C . 1397587.12 |============================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Fast MT/s > Higher Is Better A . 177.98 |=================================================================== B . 178.43 |=================================================================== C . 178.11 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Medium MT/s > Higher Is Better A . 58.04 |==================================================================== B . 58.15 |==================================================================== C . 58.04 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Thorough MT/s > Higher Is Better A . 6.9528 |=================================================================== B . 6.9463 |=================================================================== C . 6.9130 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Exhaustive MT/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.7553 |=================================================================== B . 0.7568 |=================================================================== C . 0.7547 |=================================================================== Inkscape Operation: SVG Files To PNG Seconds < Lower Is Better memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1613018.51 |=============================================================== B . 1511370.28 |=========================================================== C . 1490717.64 |========================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1701125.86 |=============================================================== B . 1651913.58 |============================================================= C . 1623836.53 |============================================================ memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1434216.13 |=============================================================== B . 1408731.93 |============================================================== C . 1439771.73 |=============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1536206.15 |=============================================================== B . 1492923.50 |============================================================= C . 1472294.05 |============================================================ memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1703287.10 |=============================================================== B . 1587437.46 |=========================================================== C . 1620664.80 |============================================================ memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1433374.57 |============================================================= B . 1471052.19 |=============================================================== C . 1407911.56 |============================================================ memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1708785.94 |=============================================================== B . 1705311.59 |=============================================================== C . 1690778.92 |============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1531801.97 |=============================================================== B . 1465097.24 |============================================================ memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1602907.29 |============================================================== B . 1629690.00 |=============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1454839.23 |=============================================================== B . 1422519.50 |============================================================== C . 1382825.47 |============================================================ memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1654936.28 |=============================================================== B . 1646498.40 |============================================================== C . 1665629.70 |=============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1804067.98 |=============================================================== B . 1598224.25 |======================================================== C . 1611931.04 |======================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: nasnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 15.79 |==================================================================== B . 15.65 |=================================================================== C . 15.84 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: mobilenetV3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.411 |=================================================================== B . 2.404 |=================================================================== C . 2.457 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: squeezenetv1.1 ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.584 |=================================================================== B . 4.573 |=================================================================== C . 4.675 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better A . 32.98 |================================================================== B . 32.94 |================================================================== C . 33.96 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 6.738 |================================================================== B . 6.811 |=================================================================== C . 6.899 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.578 |================================================================== B . 4.596 |================================================================== C . 4.711 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.499 |==================================================================== B . 5.471 |==================================================================== C . 5.511 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 29.02 |==================================================================== B . 28.64 |=================================================================== C . 29.14 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better A . 14.40 |==================================================================== B . 14.43 |==================================================================== C . 14.41 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.85 |===================================================================== B . 4.85 |===================================================================== C . 4.88 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.27 |===================================================================== B . 4.26 |===================================================================== C . 4.27 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.01 |===================================================================== B . 5.03 |===================================================================== C . 5.03 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.41 |===================================================================== B . 4.40 |===================================================================== C . 4.41 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 6.73 |===================================================================== B . 6.73 |===================================================================== C . 6.77 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.16 |==================================================================== B . 2.16 |==================================================================== C . 2.19 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better A . 15.34 |==================================================================== B . 15.15 |=================================================================== C . 15.10 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better A . 49.58 |==================================================================== B . 49.18 |=================================================================== C . 49.10 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better A . 12.77 |==================================================================== B . 12.59 |=================================================================== C . 12.59 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 9.86 |===================================================================== B . 9.89 |===================================================================== C . 9.90 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better A . 20.92 |==================================================================== B . 20.94 |==================================================================== C . 21.04 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better A . 26.11 |==================================================================== B . 25.89 |=================================================================== C . 25.83 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better A . 21.23 |=================================================================== B . 21.17 |=================================================================== C . 21.57 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better A . 14.80 |==================================================================== B . 14.78 |==================================================================== C . 14.80 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: vision_transformer ms < Lower Is Better A . 171.12 |=================================================================== B . 171.81 |=================================================================== C . 171.64 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: CPU - Model: FastestDet ms < Lower Is Better A . 6.11 |==================================================================== B . 5.82 |================================================================ C . 6.24 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better A . 7.64 |===================================================================== B . 7.66 |===================================================================== C . 7.63 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 3.42 |===================================================================== B . 3.41 |===================================================================== C . 3.41 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.18 |===================================================================== B . 4.16 |===================================================================== C . 4.18 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.75 |===================================================================== B . 2.76 |===================================================================== C . 2.75 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 3.72 |===================================================================== B . 3.73 |===================================================================== C . 3.72 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 11.34 |==================================================================== B . 11.42 |==================================================================== C . 11.33 |=================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.39 |===================================================================== B . 1.40 |===================================================================== C . 1.40 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better A . 9.00 |==================================================================== B . 9.13 |===================================================================== C . 8.98 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better A . 10.73 |=================================================================== B . 10.67 |=================================================================== C . 10.86 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.57 |===================================================================== B . 4.55 |===================================================================== C . 4.57 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 3.04 |==================================================================== B . 3.09 |===================================================================== C . 3.05 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better A . 9.75 |===================================================================== B . 9.75 |===================================================================== C . 9.77 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better A . 9.85 |===================================================================== B . 9.88 |===================================================================== C . 9.88 |===================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better A . 6.96 |==================================================================== B . 7.04 |===================================================================== C . 6.96 |==================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better A . 7.21 |===================================================================== B . 7.16 |===================================================================== C . 6.88 |================================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: vision_transformer ms < Lower Is Better A . 164.54 |============================================================== B . 177.97 |=================================================================== C . 164.31 |============================================================== NCNN 20220729 Target: Vulkan GPU - Model: FastestDet ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.60 |===================================================================== B . 2.56 |==================================================================== C . 2.61 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 2.69 |==================================================================== B . 2.71 |===================================================================== C . 2.72 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 2227.90 |================================================================== B . 2201.35 |================================================================= C . 2202.93 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 2.00 |===================================================================== B . 2.01 |===================================================================== C . 2.01 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 2962.89 |================================================================== B . 2922.79 |================================================================= C . 2929.95 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 1.97 |=================================================================== B . 2.03 |===================================================================== C . 1.99 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 3024.82 |================================================================== B . 2917.75 |================================================================ C . 2975.33 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 165.60 |================================================================= B . 166.67 |================================================================== C . 170.02 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 36.20 |==================================================================== B . 35.98 |==================================================================== C . 35.26 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 4.16 |===================================================================== B . 4.16 |===================================================================== C . 4.17 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 1440.68 |================================================================== B . 1436.03 |================================================================== C . 1438.62 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 353.79 |=================================================================== B . 355.77 |=================================================================== C . 354.76 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 16.95 |==================================================================== B . 16.86 |==================================================================== C . 16.90 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 319.27 |=================================================================== B . 319.98 |=================================================================== C . 317.41 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 18.78 |==================================================================== B . 18.74 |=================================================================== C . 18.89 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 29.33 |=================================================================== B . 29.86 |==================================================================== C . 29.71 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 204.45 |=================================================================== B . 200.80 |================================================================== C . 201.86 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 411.75 |=================================================================== B . 413.92 |=================================================================== C . 412.76 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 29.13 |==================================================================== B . 28.98 |==================================================================== C . 29.06 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 353.99 |=================================================================== B . 354.88 |=================================================================== C . 351.53 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 16.93 |==================================================================== B . 16.89 |=================================================================== C . 17.05 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 9947.11 |================================================================ B . 10061.67 |================================================================= C . 9907.84 |================================================================ OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.20 |===================================================================== B . 1.19 |==================================================================== C . 1.20 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better A . 12623.71 |================================================================= B . 12536.44 |================================================================= C . 12619.85 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better A . 0.94 |==================================================================== B . 0.95 |===================================================================== C . 0.95 |===================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 869370 |=================================================================== B . 856519 |================================================================== C . 873162 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 58740644 |================================================================= B . 55704584 |============================================================== C . 55635525 |============================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 516743 |=================================================================== B . 510169 |================================================================== C . 520170 |=================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 1031481 |================================================================== B . 1011586 |================================================================= C . 1024005 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 4514 |===================================================================== B . 4420 |==================================================================== C . 4504 |===================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 2559841 |================================================================== B . 2495285 |================================================================ C . 2485811 |================================================================ Facebook RocksDB 7.5.3 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better A . 1894185 |================================================================== B . 1891502 |================================================================== C . 1896932 |================================================================== Natron 2.4.3 Input: Spaceship FPS > Higher Is Better A . 3.1 |================================================================== B . 3.3 |====================================================================== C . 3.2 |==================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.32.6 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better A . 181386 |=================================================================== B . 180779 |=================================================================== C . 179642 |==================================================================