dd Intel Core i7-1165G7 testing with a Dell 0GG9PT (3.3.0 BIOS) and Intel Xe TGL GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 21.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: Intel Core i7-1165G7 @ 4.70GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0GG9PT (3.3.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Kioxia KBG40ZNS256G NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel Xe TGL GT2 3GB (1300MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-52-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2, Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 B: Processor: Intel Core i7-1165G7 @ 4.70GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0GG9PT (3.3.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Kioxia KBG40ZNS256G NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel Xe TGL GT2 3GB (1300MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-52-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2, Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 C: Processor: Intel Core i7-1165G7 @ 4.70GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0GG9PT (3.3.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Kioxia KBG40ZNS256G NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel Xe TGL GT2 3GB (1300MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-52-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2, Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Unpacking The Linux Kernel 5.19 linux-5.19.tar.xz Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.672 |=================================================================== B . 6.749 |==================================================================== C . 6.746 |==================================================================== C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz shuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 13113.2 |================================================================== B . 12482.6 |=============================================================== C . 12887.4 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz bitshuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 7602.4 |================================================================= B . 7359.4 |=============================================================== C . 7780.9 |=================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 202 |====================================================================== B . 202 |====================================================================== C . 198 |===================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 1085 |===================================================================== B . 1012 |================================================================ C . 1021 |================================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 59 |=============================================================== B . 66 |======================================================================= C . 62 |=================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 84 |======================================================================= B . 82 |===================================================================== C . 69 |========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 377 |============================================================ B . 439 |====================================================================== C . 441 |====================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 118 |====================================================================== B . 107 |=============================================================== C . 98 |========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 578 |=========================================================== B . 683 |====================================================================== C . 633 |================================================================= 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better A . 37032 |==================================================================== B . 30547 |======================================================== C . 34761 |================================================================ 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better A . 23446 |==================================================================== B . 18340 |===================================================== C . 21892 |=============================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 40135.53 |================================================================= B . 37649.80 |============================================================= C . 36195.22 |=========================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.5 |================================================================= B . 2.6 |=================================================================== C . 2.7 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 35942.81 |================================================================= B . 35074.41 |=============================================================== C . 21090.08 |====================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.8 |========================================== B . 2.8 |========================================== C . 4.7 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 59158.03 |============================================================ B . 64031.12 |================================================================= C . 45073.11 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 16.5 |==================================================== B . 15.2 |================================================ C . 21.8 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 35818.30 |================================================================= B . 35693.67 |================================================================= C . 12488.70 |======================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.8 |========================= B . 2.8 |========================= C . 8.0 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 59172.31 |============================================================= B . 63453.68 |================================================================= C . 44862.22 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 16.4 |==================================================== B . 15.3 |================================================ C . 21.9 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 43391.77 |============================================================== B . 45519.98 |================================================================= C . 42731.59 |============================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 21.7 |=================================================================== B . 20.6 |=============================================================== C . 22.4 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 35275.71 |================================================================= B . 21546.59 |======================================== C . 12756.34 |======================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.8 |========================= B . 4.6 |========================================= C . 7.8 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 33415.25 |================================================================= B . 12756.40 |========================= C . 11767.88 |======================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 3.0 |========================= B . 7.8 |================================================================ C . 8.5 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 49102.17 |================================================================= B . 45224.12 |============================================================ C . 43357.98 |========================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 20.0 |============================================================= B . 21.8 |================================================================== C . 22.7 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 16078.14 |================================================================= B . 12177.18 |================================================= C . 11732.11 |=============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 6.2 |=================================================== B . 8.2 |==================================================================== C . 8.5 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 50691.98 |================================================================= B . 42553.00 |======================================================= C . 40061.68 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 19.2 |====================================================== B . 23.0 |================================================================= C . 24.5 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 44683.18 |================================================================= B . 38176.55 |======================================================== C . 35639.21 |==================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 21.1 |====================================================== B . 25.2 |================================================================ C . 27.0 |===================================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1474679.78 |======================================================= B . 1674628.09 |============================================================== C . 1703302.33 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1784084.09 |=============================================================== B . 1575629.83 |======================================================== C . 1573628.84 |======================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1391188.11 |===================================================== B . 1601587.55 |============================================================ C . 1668192.16 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1508311.04 |=============================================================== B . 1346529.88 |======================================================== C . 1336863.55 |======================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1477859.36 |======================================================= B . 1706526.12 |=============================================================== C . 1699571.42 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1488002.47 |=============================================================== B . 1285063.34 |====================================================== C . 1316462.84 |======================================================== Memcached 1.6.16 Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1198477.84 |=============================================================== Memcached 1.6.16 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 863720.49 |================================================================ Memcached 1.6.16 Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1293906.76 |=============================================================== Memcached 1.6.16 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 827474.95 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3159215.00 |=============================================================== B . 3071678.50 |============================================================= C . 3113186.75 |============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2363885.0 |============================================================ B . 2502046.5 |================================================================ C . 2486617.0 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2544575.0 |===================================================== B . 3100254.0 |================================================================ C . 3064531.5 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3280898.75 |=============================================================== B . 2150021.25 |========================================= C . 2149651.50 |========================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2660471.25 |=========================================================== B . 2835777.25 |=============================================================== C . 2685044.50 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2056899.62 |======================================================= B . 2376355.50 |=============================================================== C . 2138252.50 |========================================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2555317.50 |====================================================== B . 2999453.75 |=============================================================== C . 3007627.00 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2969174.25 |=============================================================== B . 2031318.12 |=========================================== C . 2144212.75 |============================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2107075.25 |=========================================================== B . 2134418.75 |============================================================ C . 2231286.25 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2444018.00 |======================================================= B . 2794126.50 |=============================================================== C . 2654257.25 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2439969.75 |============================================================== B . 2468932.00 |=============================================================== C . 2055678.25 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2145013.50 |============================================================== B . 2187557.25 |=============================================================== C . 2101533.75 |============================================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2144304.50 |============================================================== B . 1923851.38 |======================================================== C . 2168859.75 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2786371.75 |=============================================================== B . 2796469.75 |=============================================================== C . 2755852.25 |============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1881464.62 |======================================================= B . 2167796.50 |=============================================================== C . 2115792.75 |============================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1471029.88 |=========================================================== B . 1581952.94 |=============================================================== C . 1502253.48 |============================================================ memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1799812.46 |=============================================================== B . 1656395.23 |========================================================== C . 1589072.76 |======================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1231243.10 |==================================================== B . 1500712.60 |=============================================================== C . 1423521.12 |============================================================ memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1505893.68 |=============================================================== B . 1466866.68 |============================================================= C . 1375761.01 |========================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1379985.01 |======================================================== B . 1546914.26 |=============================================================== C . 1548811.66 |=============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1446053.65 |=============================================================== B . 1353038.15 |=========================================================== C . 1262935.19 |======================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1393231.13 |=================================================== B . 1676097.32 |============================================================== C . 1707753.26 |=============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1486860.72 |=============================================================== B . 1318509.67 |======================================================== C . 1160506.41 |================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1239637.49 |================================================= B . 1572524.06 |============================================================== C . 1588093.68 |=============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1224794.74 |============================================================= B . 1273631.68 |=============================================================== C . 1159460.86 |========================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1585160.95 |============================================================= B . 1396476.13 |====================================================== C . 1631683.32 |=============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1272825.33 |================================================== B . 1602954.79 |=============================================================== C . 1310160.71 |=================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: nasnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 13.61 |============================================================= B . 15.27 |==================================================================== C . 13.58 |============================================================ Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: mobilenetV3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.602 |================================================== B . 2.175 |==================================================================== C . 1.634 |=================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: squeezenetv1.1 ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.386 |==================================================================== B . 4.063 |=============================================================== C . 4.085 |=============================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better A . 23.60 |==================================================================== B . 23.76 |==================================================================== C . 23.65 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.240 |========================================================= B . 6.272 |==================================================================== C . 5.087 |======================================================= Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.697 |==================================================================== B . 4.330 |=============================================================== C . 4.320 |=============================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.235 |==================================================================== B . 5.173 |=================================================================== C . 5.116 |================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 45.83 |==================================================================== B . 45.70 |==================================================================== C . 45.86 |====================================================================