dd

Intel Core i7-1165G7 testing with a Dell 0GG9PT (3.3.0 BIOS) and Intel Xe TGL GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 21.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2209016-NE-DD155870266
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

C/C++ Compiler Tests 2 Tests
Compression Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 3 Tests
Database Test Suite 5 Tests
Multi-Core 2 Tests
Server 5 Tests
Server CPU Tests 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
A
September 01 2022
  1 Hour, 56 Minutes
B
September 01 2022
  2 Hours, 5 Minutes
C
September 01 2022
  2 Hours, 22 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  2 Hours, 8 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

dd Intel Core i7-1165G7 testing with a Dell 0GG9PT (3.3.0 BIOS) and Intel Xe TGL GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 21.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: Intel Core i7-1165G7 @ 4.70GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0GG9PT (3.3.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Kioxia KBG40ZNS256G NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel Xe TGL GT2 3GB (1300MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-52-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2, Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 B: Processor: Intel Core i7-1165G7 @ 4.70GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0GG9PT (3.3.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Kioxia KBG40ZNS256G NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel Xe TGL GT2 3GB (1300MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-52-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2, Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 C: Processor: Intel Core i7-1165G7 @ 4.70GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0GG9PT (3.3.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Kioxia KBG40ZNS256G NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel Xe TGL GT2 3GB (1300MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-52-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2, Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Unpacking The Linux Kernel 5.19 linux-5.19.tar.xz Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.672 |=================================================================== B . 6.749 |==================================================================== C . 6.746 |==================================================================== C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz shuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 13113.2 |================================================================== B . 12482.6 |=============================================================== C . 12887.4 |================================================================= C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz bitshuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 7602.4 |================================================================= B . 7359.4 |=============================================================== C . 7780.9 |=================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 202 |====================================================================== B . 202 |====================================================================== C . 198 |===================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 1085 |===================================================================== B . 1012 |================================================================ C . 1021 |================================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 59 |=============================================================== B . 66 |======================================================================= C . 62 |=================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 84 |======================================================================= B . 82 |===================================================================== C . 69 |========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 377 |============================================================ B . 439 |====================================================================== C . 441 |====================================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 118 |====================================================================== B . 107 |=============================================================== C . 98 |========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 578 |=========================================================== B . 683 |====================================================================== C . 633 |================================================================= 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better A . 37032 |==================================================================== B . 30547 |======================================================== C . 34761 |================================================================ 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better A . 23446 |==================================================================== B . 18340 |===================================================== C . 21892 |=============================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 40135.53 |================================================================= B . 37649.80 |============================================================= C . 36195.22 |=========================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.5 |================================================================= B . 2.6 |=================================================================== C . 2.7 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 35942.81 |================================================================= B . 35074.41 |=============================================================== C . 21090.08 |====================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.8 |========================================== B . 2.8 |========================================== C . 4.7 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 59158.03 |============================================================ B . 64031.12 |================================================================= C . 45073.11 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 16.5 |==================================================== B . 15.2 |================================================ C . 21.8 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 35818.30 |================================================================= B . 35693.67 |================================================================= C . 12488.70 |======================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.8 |========================= B . 2.8 |========================= C . 8.0 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 59172.31 |============================================================= B . 63453.68 |================================================================= C . 44862.22 |============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 16.4 |==================================================== B . 15.3 |================================================ C . 21.9 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 43391.77 |============================================================== B . 45519.98 |================================================================= C . 42731.59 |============================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 21.7 |=================================================================== B . 20.6 |=============================================================== C . 22.4 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 35275.71 |================================================================= B . 21546.59 |======================================== C . 12756.34 |======================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.8 |========================= B . 4.6 |========================================= C . 7.8 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 33415.25 |================================================================= B . 12756.40 |========================= C . 11767.88 |======================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 3.0 |========================= B . 7.8 |================================================================ C . 8.5 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 49102.17 |================================================================= B . 45224.12 |============================================================ C . 43357.98 |========================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 20.0 |============================================================= B . 21.8 |================================================================== C . 22.7 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 16078.14 |================================================================= B . 12177.18 |================================================= C . 11732.11 |=============================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 6.2 |=================================================== B . 8.2 |==================================================================== C . 8.5 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 50691.98 |================================================================= B . 42553.00 |======================================================= C . 40061.68 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 19.2 |====================================================== B . 23.0 |================================================================= C . 24.5 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 44683.18 |================================================================= B . 38176.55 |======================================================== C . 35639.21 |==================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 21.1 |====================================================== B . 25.2 |================================================================ C . 27.0 |===================================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1474679.78 |======================================================= B . 1674628.09 |============================================================== C . 1703302.33 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1784084.09 |=============================================================== B . 1575629.83 |======================================================== C . 1573628.84 |======================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1391188.11 |===================================================== B . 1601587.55 |============================================================ C . 1668192.16 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1508311.04 |=============================================================== B . 1346529.88 |======================================================== C . 1336863.55 |======================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1477859.36 |======================================================= B . 1706526.12 |=============================================================== C . 1699571.42 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1488002.47 |=============================================================== B . 1285063.34 |====================================================== C . 1316462.84 |======================================================== Memcached 1.6.16 Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1198477.84 |=============================================================== Memcached 1.6.16 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 863720.49 |================================================================ Memcached 1.6.16 Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1293906.76 |=============================================================== Memcached 1.6.16 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 827474.95 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3159215.00 |=============================================================== B . 3071678.50 |============================================================= C . 3113186.75 |============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2363885.0 |============================================================ B . 2502046.5 |================================================================ C . 2486617.0 |================================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2544575.0 |===================================================== B . 3100254.0 |================================================================ C . 3064531.5 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3280898.75 |=============================================================== B . 2150021.25 |========================================= C . 2149651.50 |========================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2660471.25 |=========================================================== B . 2835777.25 |=============================================================== C . 2685044.50 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2056899.62 |======================================================= B . 2376355.50 |=============================================================== C . 2138252.50 |========================================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2555317.50 |====================================================== B . 2999453.75 |=============================================================== C . 3007627.00 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2969174.25 |=============================================================== B . 2031318.12 |=========================================== C . 2144212.75 |============================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2107075.25 |=========================================================== B . 2134418.75 |============================================================ C . 2231286.25 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2444018.00 |======================================================= B . 2794126.50 |=============================================================== C . 2654257.25 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2439969.75 |============================================================== B . 2468932.00 |=============================================================== C . 2055678.25 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2145013.50 |============================================================== B . 2187557.25 |=============================================================== C . 2101533.75 |============================================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2144304.50 |============================================================== B . 1923851.38 |======================================================== C . 2168859.75 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2786371.75 |=============================================================== B . 2796469.75 |=============================================================== C . 2755852.25 |============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1881464.62 |======================================================= B . 2167796.50 |=============================================================== C . 2115792.75 |============================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1471029.88 |=========================================================== B . 1581952.94 |=============================================================== C . 1502253.48 |============================================================ memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1799812.46 |=============================================================== B . 1656395.23 |========================================================== C . 1589072.76 |======================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1231243.10 |==================================================== B . 1500712.60 |=============================================================== C . 1423521.12 |============================================================ memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1505893.68 |=============================================================== B . 1466866.68 |============================================================= C . 1375761.01 |========================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1379985.01 |======================================================== B . 1546914.26 |=============================================================== C . 1548811.66 |=============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1446053.65 |=============================================================== B . 1353038.15 |=========================================================== C . 1262935.19 |======================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1393231.13 |=================================================== B . 1676097.32 |============================================================== C . 1707753.26 |=============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1486860.72 |=============================================================== B . 1318509.67 |======================================================== C . 1160506.41 |================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1239637.49 |================================================= B . 1572524.06 |============================================================== C . 1588093.68 |=============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1224794.74 |============================================================= B . 1273631.68 |=============================================================== C . 1159460.86 |========================================================= memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1585160.95 |============================================================= B . 1396476.13 |====================================================== C . 1631683.32 |=============================================================== memtier_benchmark 1.4 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 1272825.33 |================================================== B . 1602954.79 |=============================================================== C . 1310160.71 |=================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: nasnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 13.61 |============================================================= B . 15.27 |==================================================================== C . 13.58 |============================================================ Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: mobilenetV3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.602 |================================================== B . 2.175 |==================================================================== C . 1.634 |=================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: squeezenetv1.1 ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.386 |==================================================================== B . 4.063 |=============================================================== C . 4.085 |=============================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better A . 23.60 |==================================================================== B . 23.76 |==================================================================== C . 23.65 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.240 |========================================================= B . 6.272 |==================================================================== C . 5.087 |======================================================= Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.697 |==================================================================== B . 4.330 |=============================================================== C . 4.320 |=============================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.235 |==================================================================== B . 5.173 |=================================================================== C . 5.116 |================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 2.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 45.83 |==================================================================== B . 45.70 |==================================================================== C . 45.86 |====================================================================