tr 3990X etcd AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core testing with a Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F4p BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core @ 2.90GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F4p BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 128GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc7-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.47), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 B: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core @ 2.90GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F4p BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 128GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc7-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.47), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 C: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core @ 2.90GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI (F4p BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 128GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.19.0-051900rc7-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.47), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz shuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 14205.4 |================================================================== B . 13345.3 |============================================================== C . 13307.0 |============================================================== C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz bitshuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 9327.1 |=================================================================== B . 8903.4 |================================================================ C . 8879.8 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 18562.53 |================================================================= B . 18271.83 |================================================================ C . 18652.49 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.4 |===================================================================== B . 5.5 |====================================================================== C . 5.4 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 18447.00 |================================================================= B . 18229.86 |================================================================ C . 18455.24 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.4 |===================================================================== B . 5.5 |====================================================================== C . 5.4 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 51632.06 |================================================================= B . 48456.98 |============================================================= C . 51343.77 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 19.3 |================================================================= B . 20.6 |===================================================================== C . 19.4 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 18752.09 |================================================================= B . 18482.51 |================================================================ C . 18704.11 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.3 |===================================================================== B . 5.4 |====================================================================== C . 5.3 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 51437.80 |================================================================= B . 49193.82 |============================================================== C . 51422.18 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 19.4 |================================================================== B . 20.3 |===================================================================== C . 19.4 |================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 53775.83 |============================================================== B . 55694.72 |================================================================= C . 55931.42 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 18.6 |===================================================================== B . 17.9 |================================================================== C . 17.9 |================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 18308.90 |================================================================ B . 18316.99 |================================================================ C . 18580.84 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.5 |====================================================================== B . 5.5 |====================================================================== C . 5.4 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 18058.74 |================================================================ B . 18269.78 |================================================================ C . 18429.81 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.5 |====================================================================== B . 5.5 |====================================================================== C . 5.4 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 48658.98 |============================================================== B . 50552.56 |================================================================ C . 51326.73 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 20.5 |===================================================================== B . 19.7 |================================================================== C . 19.4 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 18421.37 |================================================================ B . 18737.07 |================================================================= C . 18636.48 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.4 |====================================================================== B . 5.3 |===================================================================== C . 5.4 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 48450.87 |============================================================= B . 51566.31 |================================================================= C . 51367.76 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 20.6 |===================================================================== B . 19.3 |================================================================= C . 19.4 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 51244.88 |============================================================ B . 55600.44 |================================================================= C . 55314.04 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 19.5 |===================================================================== B . 18.0 |================================================================ C . 18.1 |================================================================