blosc etcd tigerlake Intel Core i7-1185G7 testing with a Dell 0DXP1F (3.7.0 BIOS) and Intel Xe TGL GT2 15GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: Intel Core i7-1185G7 @ 4.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0DXP1F (3.7.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Micron 2300 NVMe 512GB, Graphics: Intel Xe TGL GT2 15GB (1350MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.18.8-051808-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1, Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 B: Processor: Intel Core i7-1185G7 @ 4.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0DXP1F (3.7.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Micron 2300 NVMe 512GB, Graphics: Intel Xe TGL GT2 15GB (1350MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.18.8-051808-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1, Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 C: Processor: Intel Core i7-1185G7 @ 4.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0DXP1F (3.7.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Micron 2300 NVMe 512GB, Graphics: Intel Xe TGL GT2 15GB (1350MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.18.8-051808-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1, Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz shuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 12706.6 |================================================================== B . 12568.5 |================================================================= C . 12098.1 |=============================================================== C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz bitshuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 7515.8 |================================================================== B . 7612.9 |=================================================================== C . 7658.4 |=================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 60995.98 |================================================================= B . 55753.71 |=========================================================== C . 52398.06 |======================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.6 |=========================================================== B . 1.8 |================================================================== C . 1.9 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 49950.32 |================================================================= B . 46357.80 |============================================================ C . 45904.34 |============================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.0 |================================================================ B . 2.1 |=================================================================== C . 2.2 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 76602.54 |================================================================= B . 68904.91 |========================================================== C . 69402.81 |=========================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 12.7 |============================================================== B . 14.2 |===================================================================== C . 14.0 |==================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 48869.41 |================================================================= B . 46376.47 |============================================================== C . 46305.20 |============================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.0 |=================================================================== B . 2.1 |====================================================================== C . 2.1 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 66742.15 |================================================================= B . 66397.97 |================================================================= C . 66372.66 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 14.5 |===================================================================== B . 14.6 |===================================================================== C . 14.6 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 51633.92 |================================================================= B . 50979.50 |================================================================ C . 50842.33 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 18.4 |==================================================================== B . 18.6 |===================================================================== C . 18.7 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 50471.79 |================================================================= B . 49857.13 |================================================================ C . 50243.22 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 2 |======================================================================== B . 2 |======================================================================== C . 2 |======================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 45932.40 |================================================================= B . 45859.05 |================================================================= C . 46156.72 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.2 |====================================================================== B . 2.2 |====================================================================== C . 2.2 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 69548.21 |================================================================= B . 69525.24 |================================================================= C . 69543.15 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 14 |======================================================================= B . 14 |======================================================================= C . 14 |======================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 46033.77 |================================================================= B . 45981.73 |================================================================= C . 46105.17 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.2 |====================================================================== B . 2.2 |====================================================================== C . 2.2 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 66128.83 |================================================================= B . 66253.40 |================================================================= C . 66428.84 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 14.7 |===================================================================== B . 14.6 |===================================================================== C . 14.6 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 50954.21 |================================================================= B . 50872.50 |================================================================= C . 50863.89 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 18.6 |===================================================================== B . 18.6 |===================================================================== C . 18.6 |=====================================================================