etcd alderlake Intel Core i7-1280P testing with a MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS) and MSI Intel ADL GT2 15GB on Arch rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: Intel Core i7-1280P @ 4.80GHz (14 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH, Graphics: MSI Intel ADL GT2 15GB (1450MHz), Audio: Intel Alder Lake PCH-P HD Audio, Network: Intel Alder Lake-P PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Arch rolling, Kernel: 5.19.1-arch2-1 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.25.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.1.6, Vulkan: 1.3.211, Compiler: GCC 12.1.1 20220730, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: Intel Core i7-1280P @ 4.80GHz (14 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH, Graphics: MSI Intel ADL GT2 15GB (1450MHz), Audio: Intel Alder Lake PCH-P HD Audio, Network: Intel Alder Lake-P PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Arch rolling, Kernel: 5.19.1-arch2-1 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.25.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.1.6, Vulkan: 1.3.211, Compiler: GCC 12.1.1 20220730, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C: Processor: Intel Core i7-1280P @ 4.80GHz (14 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MS-14C6 (E14C6IMS.115 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH, Graphics: MSI Intel ADL GT2 15GB (1450MHz), Audio: Intel Alder Lake PCH-P HD Audio, Network: Intel Alder Lake-P PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Arch rolling, Kernel: 5.19.1-arch2-1 (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.25.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.1.6, Vulkan: 1.3.211, Compiler: GCC 12.1.1 20220730, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz shuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 6389.8 |=================================================================== B . 6031.5 |=============================================================== C . 6337.7 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz bitshuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 4067.0 |============================================================= B . 3912.9 |=========================================================== C . 4437.6 |=================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 68145.69 |================================================ B . 91986.49 |================================================================= C . 36395.26 |========================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.5 |======================================= B . 1.1 |============================= C . 2.7 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 59199.59 |=================================================== B . 75725.33 |================================================================= C . 60413.63 |==================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.8 |====================================================================== B . 1.3 |=================================================== C . 1.7 |================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 76856.01 |===================================================== B . 94654.68 |================================================================= C . 92631.40 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 13.0 |===================================================================== B . 10.5 |======================================================== C . 10.8 |========================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 60284.87 |=================================================== B . 76520.70 |================================================================= C . 75011.21 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.7 |====================================================================== B . 1.3 |====================================================== C . 1.3 |====================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 74038.37 |======================================================= B . 87036.82 |================================================================ C . 87764.43 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 13.5 |===================================================================== B . 11.5 |=========================================================== C . 11.4 |========================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 69135.80 |====================================================== B . 82804.68 |================================================================= C . 80968.03 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 14.4 |===================================================================== B . 12.0 |========================================================== C . 12.3 |=========================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 61193.39 |================================================== B . 78668.52 |================================================================= C . 78814.68 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.7 |====================================================================== B . 1.3 |====================================================== C . 1.3 |====================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 56850.16 |================================================== B . 74204.00 |================================================================= C . 74389.55 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.8 |====================================================================== B . 1.3 |=================================================== C . 1.3 |=================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 69686.14 |================================================== B . 90142.13 |================================================================= C . 90581.02 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 14.4 |===================================================================== B . 11.1 |===================================================== C . 11.0 |===================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 57747.82 |================================================== B . 74689.47 |================================================================= C . 69230.68 |============================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.7 |====================================================================== B . 1.3 |====================================================== C . 1.4 |========================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 73666.32 |========================================================== B . 81586.14 |================================================================= C . 81960.27 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 13.6 |===================================================================== B . 12.2 |============================================================== C . 12.2 |============================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 68740.62 |========================================================== B . 77618.66 |================================================================= C . 77225.11 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 14.5 |===================================================================== B . 12.8 |============================================================= C . 12.9 |=============================================================