Apple M1 testing with a Apple Mac mini (M1 2020) and llvmpipe on Arch Linux ARM via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2208202-NE-BLOSCETCD91
blosc etcd apple m1
Apple M1 testing with a Apple Mac mini (M1 2020) and llvmpipe on Arch Linux ARM via the Phoronix Test Suite.
A:
Processor: Apple M1 @ 2.06GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Apple Mac mini (M1 2020), Memory: 8GB, Disk: 251GB APPLE SSD AP0256Q + 2 x 0GB APPLE SSD AP0256Q, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM57762 PCIe + Broadcom BRCM4378 + Broadcom Device 5f69
OS: Arch Linux ARM, Kernel: 5.19.0-rc7-asahi-2-1-ARCH (aarch64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.25.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 22.1.4 (LLVM 14.0.6 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 12.1.0 + Clang 14.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
B:
Processor: Apple M1 @ 2.06GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Apple Mac mini (M1 2020), Memory: 8GB, Disk: 251GB APPLE SSD AP0256Q + 2 x 0GB APPLE SSD AP0256Q, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM57762 PCIe + Broadcom BRCM4378 + Broadcom Device 5f69
OS: Arch Linux ARM, Kernel: 5.19.0-rc7-asahi-2-1-ARCH (aarch64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.25.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 22.1.4 (LLVM 14.0.6 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 12.1.0 + Clang 14.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
C:
Processor: Apple M1 @ 2.06GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Apple Mac mini (M1 2020), Memory: 8GB, Disk: 251GB APPLE SSD AP0256Q + 2 x 0GB APPLE SSD AP0256Q, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM57762 PCIe + Broadcom BRCM4378 + Broadcom Device 5f69
OS: Arch Linux ARM, Kernel: 5.19.0-rc7-asahi-2-1-ARCH (aarch64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.25.4, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 22.1.4 (LLVM 14.0.6 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 12.1.0 + Clang 14.0.6, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
C-Blosc 2.3
Test: blosclz shuffle
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 12730.7 |==================================================================
B . 12559.8 |=================================================================
C . 12017.0 |==============================================================
C-Blosc 2.3
Test: blosclz bitshuffle
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 3381.7 |=================================================================
B . 3468.1 |===================================================================
C . 3414.3 |==================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 77098.16 |=================================================================
B . 77375.12 |=================================================================
C . 77569.66 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 67473.15 |=================================================================
B . 67437.74 |=================================================================
C . 67529.98 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 104710.98 |================================================================
B . 104643.09 |================================================================
C . 104560.82 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 67649.25 |=================================================================
B . 67678.46 |=================================================================
C . 67682.51 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 97330.60 |=================================================================
B . 97442.45 |=================================================================
C . 97339.23 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 68099.49 |=================================================================
B . 68129.86 |=================================================================
C . 68168.31 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 77528.60 |=================================================================
B . 77329.43 |=================================================================
C . 77367.56 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 67265.88 |=================================================================
B . 67355.97 |=================================================================
C . 67043.74 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 104472.74 |================================================================
B . 104776.34 |================================================================
C . 104893.29 |================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 67582.66 |=================================================================
B . 67714.20 |=================================================================
C . 67445.94 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 97175.40 |=================================================================
B . 97623.56 |=================================================================
C . 97560.67 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000
Requests/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 68200.62 |=================================================================
B . 68192.13 |=================================================================
C . 68173.66 |=================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.3 |======================================================================
B . 1.3 |======================================================================
C . 1.3 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.4 |======================================================================
B . 1.4 |======================================================================
C . 1.4 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 9.2 |=====================================================================
B . 9.2 |=====================================================================
C . 9.3 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.4 |======================================================================
B . 1.4 |======================================================================
C . 1.4 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 9.9 |======================================================================
B . 9.9 |======================================================================
C . 9.9 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 13.8 |=====================================================================
B . 13.8 |=====================================================================
C . 13.8 |=====================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.3 |======================================================================
B . 1.3 |======================================================================
C . 1.3 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.5 |======================================================================
B . 1.5 |======================================================================
C . 1.5 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 9.2 |======================================================================
B . 9.2 |======================================================================
C . 9.2 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 1.4 |======================================================================
B . 1.4 |======================================================================
C . 1.4 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 9.9 |======================================================================
B . 9.9 |======================================================================
C . 9.9 |======================================================================
etcd 3.5.4
Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 13.8 |=====================================================================
B . 13.8 |=====================================================================
C . 13.8 |=====================================================================