etcd blosc

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (4006 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 6700/6700 XT / 6800M on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2208201-PTS-ETCDBLOS05
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
A
August 20 2022
  1 Hour, 9 Minutes
B
August 20 2022
  23 Minutes
C
August 20 2022
  23 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  38 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


etcd blosc, "C-Blosc 2.3 - Test: blosclz shuffle", Higher Results Are Better "A",17823,17890.1,17923.5 "B", "C", "C-Blosc 2.3 - Test: blosclz bitshuffle", Higher Results Are Better "A",11788.4,11580,11902.3 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100", Higher Results Are Better "A",78635.0423,79020.3985,78564.2733 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "A",1.3,1.3,1.3 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100", Higher Results Are Better "A",77244.2099,77075.3294,76976.4301 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "A",1.3,1.3,1.3 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000", Higher Results Are Better "A",92802.0953,90811.48,91362.663 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "A",10.8,11,10.9 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100", Higher Results Are Better "A",78063.3164,78039.634,78174.0179 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "A",1.3,1.3,1.3 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000", Higher Results Are Better "A",88406.4279,88004.2433,88216.4207 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "A",11.3,11.3,11.3 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000", Higher Results Are Better "A",87560.153,87693.9477,87651.3257 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "A",11.4,11.4,11.4 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100", Higher Results Are Better "A",78815.2384,79286,79577.0757 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "A",1.3,1.3,1.3 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100", Higher Results Are Better "A",77006.1717,77045.1627,79304.8422 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "A",1.3,1.3,1.3 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000", Higher Results Are Better "A",90926.2002,90550.0988,91057.2796 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "A",11,11,11 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100", Higher Results Are Better "A",80281.7905,78014.4511,78007.5646 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "A",1.2,1.3,1.3 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000", Higher Results Are Better "A",87752.8006,88525.2468,88103.5585 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "A",11.4,11.3,11.3 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000", Higher Results Are Better "A",87690.3799,87878.3877,87665.1208 "B", "C", "etcd 3.5.4 - Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency", Lower Results Are Better "A",11.4,11.4,11.4 "B", "C",