etcd blosc AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (4006 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 6700/6700 XT / 6800M on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core @ 3.40GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (4006 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6700/6700 XT / 6800M (2880/1124MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 21 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.42), Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 B: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core @ 3.40GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (4006 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6700/6700 XT / 6800M (2880/1124MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 21 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.42), Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 C: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core @ 3.40GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (4006 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6700/6700 XT / 6800M (2880/1124MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 21 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 DRM 3.42), Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.3 |====================================================================== B . 1.3 |====================================================================== C . 1.3 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 77098.66 |================================================================= B . 77024.35 |================================================================= C . 77559.43 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.3 |====================================================================== B . 1.3 |====================================================================== C . 1.3 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 77785.39 |================================================================= B . 78118.89 |================================================================= C . 77147.20 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.3 |====================================================================== B . 1.2 |================================================================= C . 1.3 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 78092.32 |=============================================================== B . 80536.63 |================================================================= C . 77937.10 |=============================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.3 |====================================================================== B . 1.3 |====================================================================== C . 1.3 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 78767.94 |================================================================= B . 78420.42 |================================================================ C . 79053.48 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.3 |====================================================================== B . 1.3 |====================================================================== C . 1.3 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 78739.90 |================================================================ B . 79612.68 |================================================================= C . 79095.98 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.3 |====================================================================== B . 1.3 |====================================================================== C . 1.3 |====================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 79226.10 |================================================================= B . 78905.23 |================================================================= C . 78488.33 |================================================================ etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 11.4 |===================================================================== B . 11.4 |===================================================================== C . 11.4 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 87744.63 |================================================================= B . 87849.76 |================================================================= C . 87568.79 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 11.4 |===================================================================== B . 11.4 |===================================================================== C . 11.4 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 87635.14 |================================================================= B . 87741.02 |================================================================= C . 87762.54 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 11.3 |==================================================================== B . 11.4 |===================================================================== C . 11.4 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 88209.03 |================================================================= B . 87547.62 |================================================================= C . 87608.73 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 11.3 |===================================================================== B . 11.2 |==================================================================== C . 11.3 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 88127.20 |================================================================= B . 88791.92 |================================================================= C . 88391.56 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 11 |======================================================================= B . 11 |======================================================================= C . 11 |======================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 90844.53 |================================================================= B . 91040.07 |================================================================= C . 90915.46 |================================================================= etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better A . 10.9 |==================================================================== B . 11.0 |===================================================================== C . 11.0 |===================================================================== etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Requests/sec > Higher Is Better A . 91658.75 |================================================================= B . 90468.98 |================================================================ C . 90380.09 |================================================================ C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz bitshuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 11756.9 |================================================================== B . 11476.3 |================================================================ C . 11674.8 |================================================================== C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz shuffle MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 17878.9 |================================================================= B . 18122.9 |================================================================== C . 18095.9 |==================================================================