2022-07-05-2127 ARMv8 Cortex-A55 testing with a Pine64 RK3566 SoQuartz with CM4-IO Carrier Board and Mali-G52 r1 4GB on Manjaro-ARM 22.06 via the Phoronix Test Suite. DA4064: Processor: ARMv8 Cortex-A55 @ 1.80GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Pine64 RK3566 SoQuartz with CM4-IO Carrier Board, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 63GB DA4064, Graphics: Mali-G52 r1 4GB, Monitor: InnoView OS: Manjaro-ARM 22.06, Kernel: 5.19.0-rc1-0.4-MANJARO-ARM-Q64 (aarch64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.25.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, Compiler: GCC 12.1.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better DA4064 . 3.837 |=============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better DA4064 . 5.7 |================================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better DA4064 . 76.08 |=============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better DA4064 . 2.8 |================================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better DA4064 . 160.71 |============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better DA4064 . 2.7 |================================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better DA4064 . 160.97 |============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better DA4064 . 3.831 |=============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better DA4064 . 7.261 |=============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better DA4064 . 187.70 |============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better DA4064 . 3.3 |================================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better DA4064 . 135.96 |============================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better DA4064 . 54.90 |=============================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.2.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 Seconds < Lower Is Better DA4064 . 638.63 |============================================================== KeyDB 6.2.0 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Seconds < Lower Is Better Memtier_benchmark 1.3 Protocol: Redis Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better DA4064 . 280861.97 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better DA4064 . 230123.45 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better DA4064 . 155095.35 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better DA4064 . 262548.83 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better DA4064 . 209898.88 |=========================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better