2021-12-19-14-33 Intel Core i7-7700HQ testing with a System76 Oryx Pro (1.05.02dRSA2-1 BIOS) and NVIDIA NV134 8GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core @ 3.60GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock B550M-ITX/ac (P1.50 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 + 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T2B0B-, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 460/560D / Pro 450/455/460/555/555X/560/560X 2GB (1216/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Baffin HDMI/DP, Monitor: U28E510, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel Dual Band-AC 3168NGW OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-43-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.3 (LLVM 12.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0 + Clang 10.0.0-4ubuntu1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Samsung SSD 860 - 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT: Processor: Intel Core i7-7700HQ @ 3.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: System76 Oryx Pro (1.05.02dRSA2-1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th, Memory: 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT/s GKE160SO102408-2400, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 860 + 2000GB Seagate ST2000LM007-1R81, Graphics: NVIDIA NV134 8GB, Audio: Realtek ALC898, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel 8265 / 8275 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.17.15-76051715-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 22.0.1, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0 + Clang 14.0.0-1ubuntu1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 12928.86 |=========================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 12876.46 |=========================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 13005.92 |=========================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 9199.74 |============================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 9191.75 |============================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 9401.99 |============================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 413.37 |============================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 436.98 |============================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 465.81 |============================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 412.47 |============================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 436.76 |============================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 461.69 |============================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 12820.94 |=========================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 12942.44 |=========================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 13138.74 |=========================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 10976.69 |=========================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 7712.27 |============================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 416.06 |============================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 440.17 |============================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 467.94 |============================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 409.45 |============================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 409.23 |============================= IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 11037.62 |=========================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 414.50 |============================= t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 19.06 |======================== Samsung SSD 860 - 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT . 23.49 |============================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 5.445 |==================== Samsung SSD 860 - 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT . 8.089 |============================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 21.80 |================== Samsung SSD 860 - 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT . 35.79 |============================== Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 69.01 |================= Samsung SSD 860 - 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT . 118.30 |============================= AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 32.65 |========================== Samsung SSD 860 - 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT . 37.48 |============================== Blender 3.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 203.69 |============= Samsung SSD 860 - 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT . 446.00 |============================= Blender 3.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 543.14 |============ Samsung SSD 860 - 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT . 1276.88 |============================ Blender 3.0 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 274.70 |============ Samsung SSD 860 - 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT . 661.18 |============================= Blender 3.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 3.0 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 2000GB Samsung SSD 870 .............. 680.70 |=========== Samsung SSD 860 - 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2400MT . 1708.13 |============================ Apache Benchmark 2.4.48 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better