2022-07-01-1114 ARMv8 Cortex-A72 testing on Debian 11 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 8GTF4R: Processor: ARMv8 Cortex-A72 @ 1.50GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: BCM2835 Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4 Rev 1.0, Chipset: Broadcom BCM2711, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 8GB 8GTF4R OS: Debian 11, Kernel: 5.15.32-v8+ (aarch64), Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4 LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8GTF4R . 45.40 |=============================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.2.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8GTF4R . 427.94 |============================================================== KeyDB 6.2.0 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 8 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Seconds < Lower Is Better Memtier_benchmark 1.3 Protocol: Redis Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 8GTF4R . 461904.35 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 8GTF4R . 374030.54 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 8GTF4R . 239515.40 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 8GTF4R . 444212.94 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 8GTF4R . 330033.25 |=========================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better