test2 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5118 testing with a H3C RS33M2C9S (1.00.49 BIOS) and ASPEED on CentOS Linux 7 via the Phoronix Test Suite. test2: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5118 @ 3.20GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: H3C RS33M2C9S (1.00.49 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2400MT/s Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1, Disk: 3597GB storage + 31GB U350, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 4 x Intel X722 for 1GbE OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 5.10.0-60.18.0.50.oe2203.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better test2 . 3990 |================================================================= Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better test2 . 4707.4 |=============================================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better test2 . 11904.5 |============================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better test2 . 4652.16 |============================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better test2 . 4632.49 |============================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better test2 . 4614.13 |============================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better test2 . 4647.10 |============================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better test2 . 4630.07 |============================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better test2 . 6182.34 |============================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better test2 . 6054.96 |============================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better test2 . 6057.53 |============================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better test2 . 6106.27 |============================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better test2 . 5972.30 |============================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better test2 . 29.77 |================================================================ t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better test2 . 9.630 |================================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0955 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0961 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0975 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.1087 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.1158 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.1253 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.1402 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0547 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0550 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0550 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0548 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0530 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0551 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0532 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0663 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0531 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0750 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0563 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0568 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0696 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.0941 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.1175 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.1200 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.1166 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.1387 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.1507 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.1544 |=============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better test2 . 0.1661 |=============================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 us < Lower Is Better test2 . 19.96 |================================================================ Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 us < Lower Is Better test2 . 20.15 |================================================================ Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 us < Lower Is Better test2 . 20.34 |================================================================ Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 us < Lower Is Better test2 . 20.12 |================================================================ Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better test2 . 18.43 |================================================================ Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better test2 . 111.98 |=============================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better test2 . 142464 |=============================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better test2 . 1494800 |============================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better test2 . 244.27 |=============================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Gbits/sec > Higher Is Better test2 . 240.33 |=============================================================== Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Packets/sec > Higher Is Better test2 . 2874267 |==============================================================