2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5118 testing with a H3C RS33M2C9S (1.00.49 BIOS) and ASPEED on CentOS Linux 7 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
test2 Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5118 @ 3.20GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: H3C RS33M2C9S (1.00.49 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2400MT/s Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1, Disk: 3597GB storage + 31GB U350, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 4 x Intel X722 for 1GbE
OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 5.10.0-60.18.0.50.oe2203.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: alwaysCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=genericDisk Notes: MQ-DEADLINE / relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x2006906Security Notes: itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of VMX disabled + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable
LevelDB LevelDB is a key-value storage library developed by Google that supports making use of Snappy for data compression and has other modern features. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Benchmark: Hot Read
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: leveldb: line 4: ./db_bench: No such file or directory
Benchmark: Fill Sync
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: leveldb: line 4: ./db_bench: No such file or directory
Benchmark: Overwrite
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: leveldb: line 4: ./db_bench: No such file or directory
Benchmark: Random Fill
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: leveldb: line 4: ./db_bench: No such file or directory
Benchmark: Random Read
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: leveldb: line 4: ./db_bench: No such file or directory
Benchmark: Seek Random
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: leveldb: line 4: ./db_bench: No such file or directory
Benchmark: Random Delete
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: leveldb: line 4: ./db_bench: No such file or directory
Benchmark: Sequential Fill
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: leveldb: line 4: ./db_bench: No such file or directory
PostMark This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance test2 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 42.00, N = 3 3990 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB test2 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 12.35, N = 3 4632.49 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB test2 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 4614.13 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB test2 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 4647.10 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB test2 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 2.21, N = 3 4630.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB test2 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 10.26, N = 3 6182.34 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB test2 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 9.67, N = 3 6054.96 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB test2 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 15.12, N = 3 6057.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB test2 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 27.46, N = 3 6106.27 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB test2 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 31.86, N = 3 5972.30 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
pmbench Pmbench is a Linux paging and virtual memory benchmark. This test profile will report the average page latency of the system. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% test2 0.0215 0.043 0.0645 0.086 0.1075 SE +/- 0.0005, N = 3 0.0955 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% test2 0.0216 0.0432 0.0648 0.0864 0.108 SE +/- 0.0003, N = 3 0.0961 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% test2 0.0219 0.0438 0.0657 0.0876 0.1095 SE +/- 0.0002, N = 3 0.0975 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% test2 0.0245 0.049 0.0735 0.098 0.1225 SE +/- 0.0009, N = 3 0.1087 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% test2 0.0261 0.0522 0.0783 0.1044 0.1305 SE +/- 0.0005, N = 3 0.1158 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% test2 0.0282 0.0564 0.0846 0.1128 0.141 SE +/- 0.0013, N = 15 0.1253 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% test2 0.0315 0.063 0.0945 0.126 0.1575 SE +/- 0.0021, N = 15 0.1402 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads test2 0.0123 0.0246 0.0369 0.0492 0.0615 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0547 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads test2 0.0124 0.0248 0.0372 0.0496 0.062 SE +/- 0.0002, N = 3 0.0550 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads test2 0.0124 0.0248 0.0372 0.0496 0.062 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0550 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads test2 0.0123 0.0246 0.0369 0.0492 0.0615 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0548 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes test2 0.0119 0.0238 0.0357 0.0476 0.0595 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0530 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads test2 0.0124 0.0248 0.0372 0.0496 0.062 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0551 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes test2 0.012 0.024 0.036 0.048 0.06 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0532 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads test2 0.0149 0.0298 0.0447 0.0596 0.0745 SE +/- 0.0017, N = 15 0.0663 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes test2 0.0119 0.0238 0.0357 0.0476 0.0595 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0531 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads test2 0.0169 0.0338 0.0507 0.0676 0.0845 SE +/- 0.0009, N = 3 0.0750 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes test2 0.0127 0.0254 0.0381 0.0508 0.0635 SE +/- 0.0002, N = 3 0.0563 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes test2 0.0128 0.0256 0.0384 0.0512 0.064 SE +/- 0.0004, N = 12 0.0568 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes test2 0.0157 0.0314 0.0471 0.0628 0.0785 SE +/- 0.0035, N = 12 0.0696 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes test2 0.0212 0.0424 0.0636 0.0848 0.106 SE +/- 0.0017, N = 12 0.0941 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes test2 0.0264 0.0528 0.0792 0.1056 0.132 SE +/- 0.0006, N = 3 0.1175 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes test2 0.027 0.054 0.081 0.108 0.135 SE +/- 0.0002, N = 3 0.1200 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes test2 0.0262 0.0524 0.0786 0.1048 0.131 SE +/- 0.0010, N = 3 0.1166 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes test2 0.0312 0.0624 0.0936 0.1248 0.156 SE +/- 0.0012, N = 3 0.1387 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes test2 0.0339 0.0678 0.1017 0.1356 0.1695 SE +/- 0.0006, N = 3 0.1507 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes test2 0.0347 0.0694 0.1041 0.1388 0.1735 SE +/- 0.0019, N = 3 0.1544 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 48 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes test2 0.0374 0.0748 0.1122 0.1496 0.187 SE +/- 0.0022, N = 15 0.1661 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
Ethr Ethr is a cross-platform Golang-written network performance measurement tool developed by Microsoft that is capable of testing multiple protocols and conducting different measurements. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org us, Fewer Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 test2 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.22, N = 15 19.96 MIN: 17.14 / MAX: 28.38
OpenBenchmarking.org us, Fewer Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 test2 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.30, N = 15 20.15 MIN: 17.19 / MAX: 30.73
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: Error: Test: "Latency" for Protocol: "UDP" is not supported.
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: Error: Test: "Latency" for Protocol: "UDP" is not supported.
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: Error: Invalid value "http" specified for parameter "-p".
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: Error: Invalid value "http" specified for parameter "-p".
OpenBenchmarking.org us, Fewer Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 test2 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.29, N = 12 20.34 MIN: 17.32 / MAX: 27.45
OpenBenchmarking.org us, Fewer Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 test2 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.26, N = 15 20.12 MIN: 17.41 / MAX: 28.47
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: Error: Test: "Latency" for Protocol: "UDP" is not supported.
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: Error: Test: "Latency" for Protocol: "UDP" is not supported.
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: Error: Invalid value "http" specified for parameter "-p".
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: Error: Invalid value "http" specified for parameter "-p".
OpenBenchmarking.org Gbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 test2 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.37, N = 15 18.43 MIN: 13.89 / MAX: 21.29
OpenBenchmarking.org Gbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 test2 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.25, N = 3 111.98 MIN: 105.05 / MAX: 120.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Packets/sec, More Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 test2 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 459.58, N = 3 142464 MIN: 130720 / MAX: 153290
OpenBenchmarking.org Packets/sec, More Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 test2 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 11475.19, N = 3 1494800 MIN: 1440000 / MAX: 1560000
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: Error: Invalid value "http" specified for parameter "-p".
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8
test2: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: Error: Invalid value "http" specified for parameter "-p".
OpenBenchmarking.org Gbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 test2 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.82, N = 3 244.27 MIN: 221.85 / MAX: 258.64
OpenBenchmarking.org Gbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 test2 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 4.20, N = 15 240.33 MIN: 171.32 / MAX: 278.64
OpenBenchmarking.org Packets/sec, More Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 test2 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 18362.76, N = 3 2874267 MIN: 2810000 / MAX: 2970000
test2 Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5118 @ 3.20GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: H3C RS33M2C9S (1.00.49 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2400MT/s Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1, Disk: 3597GB storage + 31GB U350, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 4 x Intel X722 for 1GbE
OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 5.10.0-60.18.0.50.oe2203.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: alwaysCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=genericDisk Notes: MQ-DEADLINE / relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x2006906Security Notes: itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of VMX disabled + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable
Testing initiated at 29 June 2022 01:02 by user .