114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT: Processor: AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core (16 Cores), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX 1996) (0.0.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 182GB, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: Red Hat Virtio device OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-40-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 22.0.1 (LLVM 13.0.1 256 bits), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: zfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080, System Layer: KVM CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 111.88 |============================================ NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 1.93814 |=========================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 193147300 |========================================= FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 46218.70 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 22211 |============================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 24754 |============================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 32175 |============================================= Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 94.16 |============================================= Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 32.82 |============================================= Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA Seconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 18.91 |============================================= Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2019-03-24 Input: Dust 2D tau100.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 254 |=============================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 4091.74 |=========================================== ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 2.877196 |========================================== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 3631.69 |=========================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.00 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 64445 |============================================= 7-Zip Compression 22.00 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 55642 |============================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 94.26 |============================================= Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 44.84 |============================================= Blender 3.2 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 146.12 |============================================ PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 1894 |============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 384 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 567 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 179 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 192 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 266 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 31.9 |============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 803 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 35.3 |============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 180 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 273 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 18.6 |============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 79.8 |============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 728 |=============================================== Kripke 1.2.4 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better 114-ubuntu-zfs200-16C-HT . 53939843 |==========================================