tgl sunny Intel Core i7-1185G7 testing with a Dell 0DXP1F (3.4.0 BIOS) and Intel Xe TGL GT2 15GB on Pop 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: Intel Core i7-1185G7 @ 4.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0DXP1F (3.4.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Micron 2300 NVMe 512GB, Graphics: Intel Xe TGL GT2 15GB (1350MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Pop 22.04, Kernel: 5.17.5-76051705-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1, Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 B: Processor: Intel Core i7-1185G7 @ 4.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0DXP1F (3.4.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Micron 2300 NVMe 512GB, Graphics: Intel Xe TGL GT2 15GB (1350MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Pop 22.04, Kernel: 5.17.5-76051705-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1, Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 C: Processor: Intel Core i7-1185G7 @ 4.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0DXP1F (3.4.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Micron 2300 NVMe 512GB, Graphics: Intel Xe TGL GT2 15GB (1350MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Pop 22.04, Kernel: 5.17.5-76051705-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1, Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 D: Processor: Intel Core i7-1185G7 @ 4.80GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0DXP1F (3.4.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Micron 2300 NVMe 512GB, Graphics: Intel Xe TGL GT2 15GB (1350MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Pop 22.04, Kernel: 5.17.5-76051705-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.1, Vulkan: 1.3.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 Mode: CPU vsamples > Higher Is Better A . 3880 |===================================================================== B . 3863 |===================================================================== D . 3867 |===================================================================== Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 Test: Square Plain C++ IPS > Higher Is Better A . 189200 |=================================================================== B . 187500 |================================================================== C . 189200 |=================================================================== D . 189300 |=================================================================== Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 Test: Square Assembly Optimized IPS > Higher Is Better A . 204800 |================================================================== B . 206500 |================================================================== C . 204800 |================================================================== D . 208200 |=================================================================== ClickHouse 100M Rows Web Analytics Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better A . 72.02 |=================================================================== B . 73.22 |==================================================================== D . 73.16 |==================================================================== ClickHouse 100M Rows Web Analytics Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better A . 75.70 |================================================================ B . 80.34 |==================================================================== D . 78.66 |=================================================================== ClickHouse 100M Rows Web Analytics Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better A . 80.64 |=================================================================== B . 81.97 |==================================================================== D . 81.45 |==================================================================== OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1.59484 |================================================================= B . 1.62309 |================================================================== C . 1.61836 |================================================================== D . 1.60513 |================================================================= OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1.61049 |================================================================ B . 1.61422 |================================================================ C . 1.64557 |================================================================== D . 1.65692 |================================================================== OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 73.07 |==================================================================== B . 73.03 |==================================================================== C . 72.91 |==================================================================== D . 72.80 |==================================================================== OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1.41652 |================================================================= B . 1.43642 |================================================================== C . 1.42740 |================================================================== D . 1.41983 |================================================================= OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1.39414 |================================================================= B . 1.40051 |================================================================== C . 1.39830 |================================================================= D . 1.40964 |================================================================== OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1.69568 |================================================================== B . 1.68027 |================================================================= C . 1.69592 |================================================================== D . 1.69508 |================================================================== ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 8.28 |===================================================================== B . 8.27 |===================================================================== C . 8.27 |===================================================================== D . 7.76 |================================================================= ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 829.79 |=================================================================== B . 829.05 |=================================================================== C . 829.10 |=================================================================== D . 777.49 |=============================================================== ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1200 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 8.28 |===================================================================== B . 8.19 |==================================================================== C . 8.24 |===================================================================== D . 7.82 |================================================================= ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1200 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 829.65 |=================================================================== B . 820.63 |================================================================== C . 825.63 |=================================================================== D . 784.13 |=============================================================== ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 62.06 |================================================================= B . 65.09 |==================================================================== C . 62.96 |================================================================== D . 63.18 |================================================================== ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 993.02 |=============================================================== B . 1041.42 |================================================================== C . 1007.39 |================================================================ D . 1010.88 |================================================================ ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1200 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 65.01 |==================================================================== B . 63.13 |================================================================== C . 63.59 |=================================================================== D . 62.19 |================================================================= ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1200 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 1040.22 |================================================================== B . 1010.03 |================================================================ C . 1017.39 |================================================================= D . 995.06 |=============================================================== ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 62.22 |==================================================================== B . 61.49 |=================================================================== C . 62.55 |==================================================================== D . 61.25 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 648.41 |=================================================================== B . 640.77 |================================================================== C . 651.80 |=================================================================== D . 638.27 |================================================================== ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1200 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 62.29 |==================================================================== B . 61.19 |=================================================================== C . 61.32 |=================================================================== D . 60.38 |================================================================== ParaView 5.10.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1200 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 649.12 |=================================================================== B . 637.63 |================================================================== C . 638.99 |================================================================== D . 629.22 |================================================================= Stockfish 15 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 8368068 |============================================================== B . 8960477 |================================================================== D . 8282587 |=============================================================