test132 Intel Core i5-3317U testing with a LENOVO (65CN99WW BIOS) and Intel 3rd Gen Core on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. TEST132: Processor: Intel Core i5-3317U @ 2.60GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO (65CN99WW BIOS), Chipset: Intel 3rd Gen Core DRAM, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 32GB SAMSUNG MZMPC032 + 1000GB Seagate ST1000LM024 HN-M + 0GB Card Reader + 2GB Flash Disk, Graphics: Intel 3rd Gen Core, Audio: Conexant CX20590, Network: Realtek RTL810xE PCI + Intel Centrino-N 2200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-40-generic (x86_64), Display Driver: NVIDIA, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x768 Test132Python: Processor: Intel Core i5-3317U @ 2.60GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO (65CN99WW BIOS), Chipset: Intel 3rd Gen Core DRAM, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 32GB SAMSUNG MZMPC032 + 1000GB Seagate ST1000LM024 HN-M + 0GB Card Reader + 2GB Flash Disk, Graphics: Intel 3rd Gen Core, Audio: Conexant CX20590, Network: Realtek RTL810xE PCI + Intel Centrino-N 2200 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-40-generic (x86_64), Display Driver: NVIDIA, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x768 Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 735.02 |============================================================= Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 244.50 |============================================================= Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 186.64 |============================================================= Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 2393.77 |============================================================ SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better TEST132 . 4.1 |================================================================ Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.1 Test: Square Plain C++ IPS > Higher Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.1 Test: Square Assembly Optimized IPS > Higher Is Better Nettle 3.8 Test: aes256 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 617.55 |============================================================= Nettle 3.8 Test: chacha Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 600.12 |============================================================= Nettle 3.8 Test: sha512 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 292.05 |============================================================= Nettle 3.8 Test: poly1305-aes Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 1648.86 |============================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 53.96 |============================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 51.12 |============================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 220.05 |============================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 191.70 |============================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 173.79 |============================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 172.88 |============================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 204.85 |============================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 205.12 |============================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 75.94 |============================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 75.96 |============================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 303.71 |============================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 302.03 |============================================================= John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better TEST132 . 440.38 |============================================================= Aircrack-ng 1.5.2 k/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 2153.13 |============================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better SecureMark 1.0.4 Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS marks > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 125417 |============================================================= OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 337384520 |========================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 204 |================================================================ OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 13437.9 |============================================================ Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 767626 |============================================================= Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 309619 |============================================================= Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 157.9 |============================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 158.3 |============================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 210.0 |============================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 205.1 |============================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 235.3 |============================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 238.3 |============================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 121.5 |============================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 122.0 |============================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 215.1 |============================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 236.1 |============================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 238.2 |============================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better TEST132 . 205 |================================================================ Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Test132Python . 153.59 |======================================================= Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 52.34 |======================================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 2042 |========================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: EXPoSE Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 1739.76 |====================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Relative Entropy Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 155.63 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Windowed Gaussian Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 97.10 |======================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Earthgecko Skyline Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 1037.00 |====================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Bayesian Changepoint Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 264.15 |======================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_ica Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 155.29 |======================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_qda Seconds < Lower Is Better Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 33.90 |======================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 26.53 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.003 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.009 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.012 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.04 |========================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.009 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.02 |========================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.041 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.082 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.044 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.153 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.164 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.303 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.182 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.684 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.721 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 2.833 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 0.616 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 1.260 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 2.875 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 5.059 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 0.22.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Test132Python . 29.77 |========================================================