edge550devcloud-2xcpu6348-16xdimms-recssd-6min-customchs-biosopt-clips-v4381-ccd-allprofiles-1 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6348 testing with a (1.4.4 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. v4381-allprofiles-1: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6348 (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: (1.4.4 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 0998, Memory: 252GB, Disk: 960GB INTEL SSDSC2KG96 + 7 x 1920GB KRM6VVUG1T92 + Transcend 16GB + 480GB DELLBOSS VD, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 2-port PCIe + 4 x Broadcom BCM57504 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb/40Gb/50Gb/100Gb/200Gb OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.13.0-51-generic (x86_64), OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 21.2.6 (LLVM 12.0.0 256 bits), Vulkan: 1.1.182, Compiler: GCC 9.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 67 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 11.19 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 67 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 32.04 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 67 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 956 |==================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 67 Channels - Read IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 0.01 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 67 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 16510.17 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 67 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 42.1 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 67 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 67 |===================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 67 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.02 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 93 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 14.45 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 93 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 39.32 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 93 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 1149.33 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 93 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 18682.51 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 93 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 42.08 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 93 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 92.67 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 93 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.02 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 70 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 11.77 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 70 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 33.73 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 70 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 1025.78 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 70 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 17293.41 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 70 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 46.18 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 70 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 70 |===================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 70 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.0145 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 77 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 12.06 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 77 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 32.9 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 77 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 900.66 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 77 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 17441.6 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 77 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 40 |===================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 77 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 76.83 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 77 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.02 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 91 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 12.57 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 91 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 30.8 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 91 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 619.86 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 91 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 19559.21 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 91 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 53.1 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 91 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 90.83 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 91 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.01 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 78 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 10.42 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 78 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 25.46 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 78 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 481.93 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 78 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 18372.13 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 78 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 58.4 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 78 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 77.83 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 78 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 7.82625 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 72 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 11.15 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 72 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 30.59 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 72 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 821.53 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 72 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 17553.48 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 72 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 51.03 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 72 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 71.83 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 72 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.01 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 83 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 13 |===================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 83 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 35.56 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 83 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 1013.9 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 83 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 18660.28 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 83 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 46.67 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 83 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 83 |===================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 1080P, 15fps, 83 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.01475 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 58 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 9.66 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 58 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 27.95 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 58 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 794.09 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 58 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 16225.86 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 58 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 47.25 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 58 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 58 |===================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 1080P, 30fps, 58 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.01 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 720P, 8fps, 99 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 16.22 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 720P, 8fps, 99 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 45.92 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 720P, 8fps, 99 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 1536.08 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 720P, 8fps, 99 Channels - Read IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 0.01 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 720P, 8fps, 99 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 14543.92 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 720P, 8fps, 99 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 39.82 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 720P, 8fps, 99 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 98.83 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H265, 720P, 8fps, 99 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.01 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 100 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 13.68 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 100 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 33.51 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 100 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 695.54 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 100 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 19514.82 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 100 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 42.74 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 100 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 99.67 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 100 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.01 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 86 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 11.66 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 86 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 28.65 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 86 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 568.8 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 86 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 18406.09 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 86 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 46.44 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 86 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 86 |===================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 1080P, 30fps, 86 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.01 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 720P, 8fps, 159 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 20.55 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 720P, 8fps, 159 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 49.71 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 720P, 8fps, 159 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 1102.96 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 720P, 8fps, 159 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 17516.58 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 720P, 8fps, 159 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 41.26 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 720P, 8fps, 159 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 158.83 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H265, 720P, 8fps, 159 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.01 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 76 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 12.69 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 76 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 36.41 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 76 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 1138.26 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 76 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 17203.41 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 76 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 40.15 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 76 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 76 |===================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 1080P, 15fps, 76 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.01525 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 720P, 8fps, 176 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 22.63 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 720P, 8fps, 176 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 54.95 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 720P, 8fps, 176 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 1275.59 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 720P, 8fps, 176 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 17516.65 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 720P, 8fps, 176 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 38.57 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 720P, 8fps, 176 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 175.5 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Remote Guarding, H264, 720P, 8fps, 176 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.01 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 720P, 8fps, 133 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 19.92 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 720P, 8fps, 133 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 53.57 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 720P, 8fps, 133 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 1707.87 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 720P, 8fps, 133 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 15679.43 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 720P, 8fps, 133 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 36.87 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 720P, 8fps, 133 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 133 |==================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H264, 720P, 8fps, 133 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.01 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 720P, 8fps, 100 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 16.33 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 720P, 8fps, 100 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 46.47 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 720P, 8fps, 100 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 1584.65 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 720P, 8fps, 100 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 14199.95 |=============================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 720P, 8fps, 100 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 35.94 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 720P, 8fps, 100 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 99.83 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Traffic, H264, 720P, 8fps, 100 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.01 |=================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 720P, 8fps, 130 Channels - Recordings Rate MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 19.36 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 720P, 8fps, 130 Channels - Write Throughput MB/s < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 52.06 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 720P, 8fps, 130 Channels - Write IOPS IOPS < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 1648.27 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 720P, 8fps, 130 Channels - RAM Usage MiB < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 16090.1 |================================================ innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 720P, 8fps, 130 Channels - CPU Usage Percentage < Lower Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 40.35 |================================================== innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 720P, 8fps, 130 Channels - Number Of Analytics Channels Channels > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 129.67 |================================================= innoVi Benchmark 2.0 Test: CCD, Smart City, H265, 720P, 8fps, 130 Channels - Processing Frame Rate FPS > Higher Is Better v4381-allprofiles-1 . 8.01 |===================================================