ituietst312-ol86 ituietst312-ol86 ituietst312-ol86: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6240 (3 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX (VMW71.00V.16707776.B64.2008070230 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 1 x 4 GB DRAM VMW-4096MB, Disk: 56GB Virtual disk + 279GB Virtual disk, Graphics: VMware SVGA II, Network: VMware VMXNET3 OS: Oracle Linux Server 8.6, Kernel: 4.18.0-372.9.1.el8.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.5.0 20210514, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: VMware LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1.175 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 0.1 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2848.04 |=================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 24.6 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 8.808 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 25.3 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 8.547 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1.139 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1.482 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 8.195 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 35.7 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 6.058 |===================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 58.04 |===================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 533294 |==================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1023 |====================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 5685 |====================================================== ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 104760 |==================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 0.14705946 |================================================ Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 0.00175999 |================================================ OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.2.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 137.04 |==================================================== KeyDB 6.2.0 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 8 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 20733 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 0.048 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 497 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2.023 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 38417 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1.301 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 34726 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2.881 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 25799 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 9.692 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 627 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 79.72 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 22578 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 22.15 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 19332 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 0.052 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1026 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 97.45 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 452 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 571.84 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 301 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1665.25 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1036 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 0.966 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 33141 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1.509 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 693 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1.494 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 28169 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 3.551 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 21133 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 11.84 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 3808 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 13.13 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 13196 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 37.90 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 352 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 3.306 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 5158 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 10.90 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 564 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1.813 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 3119 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 32.67 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2896 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 86.37 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2321 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 215.48 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 4464 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 23.38 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 6045 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 41.67 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2724 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 18.80 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 6421 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 77.88 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 327 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 3.150 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 3887 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 13.86 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2745 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 36.70 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2495 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 100.23 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2122 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 237.64 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 4240 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 24.42 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 3890 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 72.13 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2305 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 22.71 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 4567 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 111.64 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2494 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 44.54 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2544 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 98.29 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2284 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 219.11 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 104.45 |==================================================== Memtier_benchmark 1.3 Protocol: Redis Ops/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1094234.01 |================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1349205.17 |================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1631546.83 |================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1252200.62 |================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1806906.21 |================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 1477897.42 |================================================ Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 7918 |====================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 245607 |==================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 8301509 |=================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 105945 |==================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 287666 |==================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 793 |======================================================= Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 140836 |==================================================== Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 258477 |==================================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 56181.20 |================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 80337.17 |================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 84902.90 |================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 82783.22 |================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 77806.62 |================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 72391.00 |================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 4668 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 213 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 7251 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 550 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 7913 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2116 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 7223 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 138 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 7403 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 539 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 4443 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 3590 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 44693 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 22 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 47768 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 84 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 47033 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 341 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 8995 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 110 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 13897 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 286 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 17750 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 899 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 51572 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 19 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 55378 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 72 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 6900 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 144 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 7456 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 535 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 59345 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 275 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 3974 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 4009 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 3171 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 314 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 4930 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 810 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 6686 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2391 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 54931.39 |================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 79524.92 |================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 83163.95 |================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 81069.87 |================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 79948.47 |================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 76442.66 |================================================== Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 200 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 10073.24 |================================================== Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 9900.45 |=================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 482363 |==================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 0.518 |===================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2.757 |===================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 315671.2 |================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 343850.6 |================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better ituietst312-ol86 . 2198.7 |====================================================