Y B200-8.5-uek-3 B200-8.5-uek: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5222 @ 3.90GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Cisco UCSB-B200-M5 (B200M5.4.1.3e.0.1210201721 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 12 x 32 GB DDR4-2933MT/s M393A4K40DB2-CVF, Disk: 12 x 215GB FlashArray + 12 x 161GB FlashArray, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot], Network: Cisco VIC NIC OS: OracleServer 8.5, Kernel: 5.4.17-2136.302.7.2.el8uek.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.5.0 20210514, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 B200-8.5-uek-2: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5222 @ 3.90GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Cisco UCSB-B200-M5 (B200M5.4.1.3e.0.1210201721 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 12 x 32 GB DDR4-2933MT/s M393A4K40DB2-CVF, Disk: 12 x 215GB FlashArray + 12 x 161GB FlashArray, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot], Network: Cisco VIC NIC OS: Oracle Linux Server 8.6, Kernel: 5.4.17-2136.307.3.5.el8uek.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.5.0 20210514, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 B200-8.5-uek-3: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5222 @ 3.90GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Cisco UCSB-B200-M5 (B200M5.4.1.3e.0.1210201721 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 12 x 32 GB DDR4-2933MT/s M393A4K40DB2-CVF, Disk: 12 x 215GB FlashArray + 12 x 161GB FlashArray, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot], Network: Cisco VIC NIC OS: Oracle Linux Server 8.6, Kernel: 5.4.17-2136.307.3.5.el8uek.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.5.0 20210514, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 19.13 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 18.99 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 1.0 |========================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.5 |============================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 1692.76 |========================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 3550.31 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 26.0 |======================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 25.9 |======================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 67.98 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 68.25 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 25.7 |======================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 25.8 |======================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 68.70 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 68.45 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 18.41 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 18.89 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 24.35 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 23.99 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 65.22 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 65.66 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 25.9 |======================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 25.8 |======================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 68.28 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 68.45 |======================================================= SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 13.08 |======================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 31.35 |======================================================= BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 1967205 |===================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1964362 |===================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 11236 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 10885 |===================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 2.13 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 2.15 |======================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.81 |======================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.81 |======================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 3.14 |======================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 3.16 |======================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 3.81 |======================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 3.83 |======================================================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 8753 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 9038 |======================================================== ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 470178 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 450839 |==================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.11672991 |================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.11576472 |================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.00117870 |================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.00118583 |================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 2723211617 |================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 2374.1 |====================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 156808.9 |==================================================== Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.2.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 Seconds < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 87.75 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 89.46 |======================================================= KeyDB 6.2.0 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 8 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 29501 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 30035 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.034 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.034 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 1279 |======================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 602 |========================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.833 |========================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1.758 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 268936 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 268674 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.186 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.186 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 284372 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 283336 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.352 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.353 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 275535 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 274812 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.907 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.910 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 1445 |======================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 678 |========================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 40.19 |============================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 74.40 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 215760 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 214897 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 2.317 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 2.327 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 28246 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 28701 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.035 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.035 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 1748 |======================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 682 |====================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 57.21 |===================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 147.01 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 1131 |======================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 645 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 227.95 |=============================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 393.16 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 908 |========================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 479 |============================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 550.90 |============================ B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1059.79 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 1113 |======================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 624 |=============================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.899 |=============================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1.618 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 253350 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 252565 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.197 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.198 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 24701 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 24660 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.041 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.041 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 261494 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 259525 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.382 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.385 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 253842 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 252328 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.985 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.991 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 19644 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 12771 |==================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 2.546 |==================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 3.916 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 199032 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 198714 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 2.512 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 2.516 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 1044 |======================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 642 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.958 |================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1.558 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 216051 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 217013 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.231 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.230 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 21731 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 21214 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.046 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.047 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 21980 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 15608 |======================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 4.581 |======================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 6.407 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 20302 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 16756 |============================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 12.32 |============================================ B200-8.5-uek-3 . 15.30 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 17460 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 14419 |============================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 28.64 |============================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 35.17 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 209752 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 210835 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.477 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.474 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 199897 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 199835 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 1.251 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1.251 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 15559 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 10631 |====================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 3.215 |==================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 4.953 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 167765 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 167938 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 2.981 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 2.977 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 991 |========================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 621 |==================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 1.009 |================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1.611 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 182991 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 182189 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.273 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.275 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 17345 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 13743 |============================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 5.812 |============================================ B200-8.5-uek-3 . 7.278 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 18040 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 16375 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 13.94 |================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 15.40 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 15828 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 13899 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 31.59 |================================================ B200-8.5-uek-3 . 36.24 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 174773 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 174465 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 0.572 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 0.573 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 166978 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 166385 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 1.497 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 1.502 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 13733 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 10299 |========================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 3.642 |======================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 4.980 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 147242 |====================================================== B200-8.5-uek-3 . 145932 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek ... 3.396 |======================================================= B200-8.5-uek-3 . 3.426 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 13831 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 7.426 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 16612 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 15.06 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 12145 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 45.32 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 68.13 |========================================================= Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis Ops/sec > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 2225496.36 |==================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 2036043.03 |==================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 1663383.12 |==================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 1430054.68 |==================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 1925696.54 |==================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 1614821.76 |==================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 68865 |========================================================= Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 79550 |========================================================= Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 64727 |========================================================= Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 66033 |========================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 589655 |======================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 40795942 |====================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 355583 |======================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 640849 |======================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 4294 |========================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 1346717 |======================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 1127470 |======================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 84333.62 |====================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 196498.78 |===================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 201850.87 |===================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 202894.53 |===================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 202494.33 |===================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 200968.88 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 8825 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 114 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 25632 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 155 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 48101 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 331 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 54063 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 589 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 56444 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 1132 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 55638 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 2300 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 11194 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 92 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 47013 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 84 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 100356 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 158 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 127197 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 249 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 138844 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 458 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 73047 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 13 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 213088 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 29 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 139720 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 910 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 238028 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 98 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 166110 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 229 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 83310 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 191 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 105038 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 303 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 107958 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 590 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 91023 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 10 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 260053 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 35 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 10860 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 93 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 39347 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 101 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 125409 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 1017 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 422154 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 67 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 513600 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 81 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 402886 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 213 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 71883 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 221 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 93425 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 341 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 91920 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 694 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 5100 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 200 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 16923 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 235 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 385771 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 457 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 55502 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 2303 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 27371 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 596 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 36376 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 881 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 8446.72 |======================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 46716.46 |====================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 66967.50 |====================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 68259.63 |====================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 57489.62 |====================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 52406.77 |====================================================== Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 200 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 66593.90 |====================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 592745 |======================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 0.429 |========================================================= PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 2.292 |========================================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 1080984.0 |===================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 1351873.4 |===================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better B200-8.5-uek . 1372446.4 |=====================================================