RTX 3090 Compute On Linux
Intel Core i9-12900K testing with a ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (1003 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


RTX 3090: 

	Processor: Intel Core i9-12900K @ 5.20GHz (16 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (1003 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 + 2000GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB, Audio: Intel Device 7ad0, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

	OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-27-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 515.43.04, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.7.57, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 39732.8 |===========================================================


LeelaChessZero 0.28
Backend: OpenCL
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 64247 |=============================================================


LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 8.84 |==============================================================


OctaneBench 2020.1
Total Score
Score > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 693.74 |============================================================


FAHBench 2.3.2

Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 356.87 |============================================================


Blender 3.0
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RTX 3090 . 89.19 |=============================================================


Chaos Group V-RAY 5
Mode: NVIDIA CUDA GPU
vpaths > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 2122 |==============================================================


Chaos Group V-RAY 5
Mode: NVIDIA RTX GPU
vrays > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 2886 |==============================================================


LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 10.29 |=============================================================


LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 10.85 |=============================================================


IndigoBench 4.4
Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Bedroom
M samples/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 20.95 |=============================================================


LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 11.32 |=============================================================


IndigoBench 4.4
Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Supercar
M samples/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 53.30 |=============================================================


Blender 3.0
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RTX 3090 . 54.56 |=============================================================


Blender 3.0
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RTX 3090 . 47.94 |=============================================================


Blender 3.0
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RTX 3090 . 22.58 |=============================================================


Blender 3.0
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RTX 3090 . 22.25 |=============================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 2248.71 |===========================================================


Blender 3.0
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RTX 3090 . 18.05 |=============================================================


Blender 3.0
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RTX 3090 . 17.14 |=============================================================


Blender 3.0
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RTX 3090 . 11.07 |=============================================================


Blender 3.0
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RTX 3090 . 10.98 |=============================================================


LuxCoreRender 2.6
Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: GPU
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 30.09 |=============================================================


Blender 3.0
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
RTX 3090 . 6.85 |==============================================================


Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: SHA-512
H/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 2883533333 |========================================================


Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: SHA1
H/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 22712066667 |=======================================================


Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: MD5
H/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 71856966667 |=======================================================


Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS
H/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 821233 |============================================================


Hashcat 6.2.4
Benchmark: 7-Zip
H/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 1143733 |===========================================================


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Write
GB/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 739.0 |=============================================================


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Copy
GB/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 362.6 |=============================================================


cl-mem 2017-01-13
Benchmark: Read
GB/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 814.1 |=============================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 8116.72 |===========================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback
GB/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 25.08 |=============================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 2101.82 |===========================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad
GB/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 13.43 |=============================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download
GB/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 23.24 |=============================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction
GB/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 392.68 |============================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 429.04 |============================================================


SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17
Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash
GHash/s > Higher Is Better
RTX 3090 . 44.45 |=============================================================