RTX 3090 Compute On Linux Intel Core i9-12900K testing with a ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (1003 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. RTX 3090: Processor: Intel Core i9-12900K @ 5.20GHz (16 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (1003 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 + 2000GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB, Audio: Intel Device 7ad0, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-27-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 515.43.04, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.7.57, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops GFLOPS > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 39732.8 |=========================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: OpenCL Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 64247 |============================================================= LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 8.84 |============================================================== OctaneBench 2020.1 Total Score Score > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 693.74 |============================================================ FAHBench 2.3.2 Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 356.87 |============================================================ Blender 3.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better RTX 3090 . 89.19 |============================================================= Chaos Group V-RAY 5 Mode: NVIDIA CUDA GPU vpaths > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 2122 |============================================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 5 Mode: NVIDIA RTX GPU vrays > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 2886 |============================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 10.29 |============================================================= LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 10.85 |============================================================= IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 20.95 |============================================================= LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 11.32 |============================================================= IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 53.30 |============================================================= Blender 3.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better RTX 3090 . 54.56 |============================================================= Blender 3.0 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better RTX 3090 . 47.94 |============================================================= Blender 3.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better RTX 3090 . 22.58 |============================================================= Blender 3.0 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better RTX 3090 . 22.25 |============================================================= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 2248.71 |=========================================================== Blender 3.0 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better RTX 3090 . 18.05 |============================================================= Blender 3.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better RTX 3090 . 17.14 |============================================================= Blender 3.0 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better RTX 3090 . 11.07 |============================================================= Blender 3.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better RTX 3090 . 10.98 |============================================================= LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: GPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 30.09 |============================================================= Blender 3.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better RTX 3090 . 6.85 |============================================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA-512 H/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 2883533333 |======================================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: SHA1 H/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 22712066667 |======================================================= Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: MD5 H/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 71856966667 |======================================================= Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS H/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 821233 |============================================================ Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: 7-Zip H/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 1143733 |=========================================================== cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Write GB/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 739.0 |============================================================= cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Copy GB/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 362.6 |============================================================= cl-mem 2017-01-13 Benchmark: Read GB/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 814.1 |============================================================= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N GFLOPS > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 8116.72 |=========================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback GB/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 25.08 |============================================================= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP GFLOPS > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 2101.82 |=========================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 13.43 |============================================================= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download GB/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 23.24 |============================================================= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction GB/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 392.68 |============================================================ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D GFLOPS > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 429.04 |============================================================ SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash GHash/s > Higher Is Better RTX 3090 . 44.45 |=============================================================