2022-04-21-2042 VMware testing on CentOS 7.9.2009 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Cent_7.9_20220421: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6240 (3 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX (6.00 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB DRAM, Disk: 56GB Virtual disk + 279GB Virtual disk, Graphics: VMware SVGA II, Network: VMware VMXNET3 OS: CentOS 7.9.2009, Kernel: 3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1176x885, System Layer: VMware LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 1.065 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 0.1 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 2280.48 |================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 24.6 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 8.831 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 24.0 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 9.090 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 1.062 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 1.897 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 8.454 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 32.3 |===================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 6.757 |==================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 12.58 |==================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 504049 |=================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 1797 |===================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 3406 |===================================================== ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 87938 |==================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 0.16394718 |=============================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 0.00203721 |=============================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 528516420 |================================================ OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 298.9 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 19099.1 |================================================== Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better Apache CouchDB 3.2.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 Seconds < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 136.37 |=================================================== KeyDB 6.2.0 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 8 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 18411 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 0.054 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 823 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 1.289 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 36974 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 1.352 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 36301 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 2.755 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 28998 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 8.621 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 744 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 78.18 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 24110 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 20.74 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 16454 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 0.061 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 705 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 157.30 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 411 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 620.56 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 287 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 1739.21 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 1073 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 0.932 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 30811 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 1.623 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 743 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 1.499 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 28527 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 3.506 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 21374 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 11.70 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 3858 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 12.96 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 16078 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 31.11 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 417 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 2.523 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 14319 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 3.493 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 504 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 2.220 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 3829 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 26.12 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 3131 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 79.86 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 2469 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 202.53 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 14412 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 6.939 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 11723 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 21.41 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 3308 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 15.12 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 10692 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 46.77 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 370 |====================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 2.772 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 13209 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 3.798 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 3231 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 30.96 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 2779 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 90.10 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 2380 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 210.09 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 10132 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 10.58 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 10904 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 23.27 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 3111 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 16.07 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 9997 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 50.40 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 2984 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 33.62 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 2799 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 89.31 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 2346 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 213.18 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 113.45 |=================================================== Memtier_benchmark 1.3 Protocol: Redis Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 1106391.08 |=============================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 8614 |===================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better Facebook RocksDB 7.0.1 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 63309.10 |================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 105841.23 |================================================ nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 104863.12 |================================================ nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 104631.97 |================================================ nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 97995.84 |================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 94288.86 |================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 5370 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 185 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 6899 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 857 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 6062 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 3923 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 8000 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 124 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 18268 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 218 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 24474 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 652 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 45094 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 21 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 49347 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 81 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 7865 |===================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 126 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 14982 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 267 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 18925 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 843 |====================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 51569 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 19 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 56733 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 71 |======================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 6709.29 |================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 11394.19 |================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 12585.50 |================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 12207.70 |================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 12927.82 |================================================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 10667.12 |================================================= Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 200 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 9088.80 |================================================== Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 8913.50 |================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 502091 |=================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 0.498 |==================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 2.540 |==================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 354568.0 |================================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better Cent_7.9_20220421 . 352628.9 |=================================================