eelbenchamrk KVM testing on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2 @ 3.20GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0W7H8C (2.9.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v2/Xeon, Memory: 48GB, Disk: 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 + 2 x 1000GB Seagate ST1000NM0011 + PNY CS900 500GB, Graphics: Matrox G200eR2, Monitor: EB2442, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-25-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.0, Display Server: X Server, Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1680x1050 EverettRUN: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2 (2 Cores), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9 2009) (1.15.0-1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 82G33/G31/P35/P31 + ICH9, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 14GB, Graphics: Red Hat Virtio GPU, Audio: QEMU Generic, Monitor: QEMU Monitor, Network: Red Hat Virtio device OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-25-generic (x86_64), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: KVM Test: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2 (2 Cores), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9 2009) (1.15.0-1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 82G33/G31/P35/P31 + ICH9, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 14GB, Graphics: Red Hat Virtio GPU, Audio: QEMU Generic, Monitor: QEMU Monitor, Network: Red Hat Virtio device OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-25-generic (x86_64), Vulkan: 1.2.204, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: KVM SQLite 3.37.2 Timed SQLite Insertions Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . 22.72 |==================== EverettRUN .......................... 37.92 |================================== Test ................................ 38.04 |================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . 7077.4 |================================= EverettRUN .......................... 6515.3 |============================== Test ................................ 6326.8 |============================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . 13847.2 |================================ EverettRUN .......................... 13136.9 |============================== Test ................................ 11872.7 |=========================== Stressful Application Test Threads: 1 - RAM To Test: 4GB - Duration: 30 Seconds Pass / Fail 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . PASS Stressful Application Test Threads: 2 - RAM To Test: 4GB - Duration: 30 Seconds Pass / Fail 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . PASS Stressful Application Test Threads: 4 - RAM To Test: 4GB - Duration: 30 Seconds Pass / Fail 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . PASS Stressful Application Test Threads: 8 - RAM To Test: 4GB - Duration: 30 Seconds Pass / Fail 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . PASS Stressful Application Test Threads: 16 - RAM To Test: 4GB - Duration: 30 Seconds Pass / Fail 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . PASS Stressful Application Test Threads: 20 - RAM To Test: 4GB - Duration: 30 Seconds Pass / Fail 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . PASS SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . 489.97 |================================= EverettRUN .......................... 480.77 |================================ Test ................................ 473.59 |================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . 105.39 |================================= EverettRUN .......................... 105.13 |================================= Test ................................ 104.90 |================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . 223.83 |================================= EverettRUN .......................... 202.74 |============================== Test ................................ 174.55 |========================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . 504.32 |================================= EverettRUN .......................... 499.72 |================================= Test ................................ 499.11 |================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . 685.70 |================================= EverettRUN .......................... 671.92 |================================ Test ................................ 665.69 |================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . 930.59 |================================= EverettRUN .......................... 924.31 |================================= Test ................................ 923.67 |================================= Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . 52.25 |================================= EverettRUN .......................... 53.34 |================================== Test ................................ 54.06 |================================== Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: RAM / Memory MiB/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . 16308.27 |=============================== Test ................................ 5956.93 |=========== Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 . 12865.85 |=============================== Test ................................ 1938.26 |===== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better