hetzner AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core testing with a ASUS Pro WS 565-ACE (2424 BIOS) and ASPEED on Debian 11 via the Phoronix Test Suite. AX41-nvme: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core @ 3.60GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS Pro WS 565-ACE (2424 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 2 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M378A4G43AB2-CWE, Disk: 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Intel I210 OS: Debian 11, Kernel: 5.10.0-11-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core @ 3.60GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS Pro WS 565-ACE (2424 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 2 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M378A4G43AB2-CWE, Disk: 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Intel I210 OS: Debian 11, Kernel: 5.10.0-11-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.333 |================================= PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1.624 |================================= BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 2160081 |=============================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 15553 |================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 4 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 32 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 128 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace - Connections: 256 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 8431311607 |============================ OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1751.1 |================================ OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 113279.3 |============================== Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 200 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 68775.16 |============================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 7113 |================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 638978 |================================ Apache CouchDB 3.2.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 55.17 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 14459 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 68 |==================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 32128 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 124 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 53647 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 296 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 52693 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 605 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 51789 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1234 |================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 51022 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 2506 |================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 48963 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 5221 |================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 17511 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 56 |==================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 70450 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 56 |==================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 114110 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 139 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 141306 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 228 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 155498 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 414 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 103584 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 9 |===================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 256588 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 33 |==================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 138810 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 920 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 151843 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1682 |================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 242105 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 99 |==================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 219762 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 247 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 176456 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 412 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 166599 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 825 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 200502 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1318 |================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 18464 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 54 |==================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 48702 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 81 |==================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 66392 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 240 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 74772 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 430 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 95177 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 674 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 125482 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 7 |===================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 298273 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 60 |==================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 18780 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 52 |==================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 50095 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 79 |==================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 117187 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1090 |================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 113815 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 2246 |================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 387649 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 63 |==================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 392559 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 96 |==================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 355566 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 184 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 73007 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 218 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 87120 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 372 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 61359 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1043 |================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 9467 |================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 104 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 22209 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 180 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 346619 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 368 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 328125 |================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 776 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 42150 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 3040 |================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 32393 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 7914 |================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 37412 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 428 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 48925 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 661 |=================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 48477 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1331 |================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 42398 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 3026 |================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 38504 |================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 256 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 6646 |================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1185073.1 |============================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1342134.2 |============================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1351716.3 |============================= Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis KeyDB 6.2.0 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 637796.22 |============================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 2793879.40 |============================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 2154766.25 |============================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1667810.17 |============================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 2503451.25 |============================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1869222.52 |============================ SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 62.84 |================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 695644 |================================ Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 36248436 |============================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 384664 |================================ Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 849987 |================================ Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1094 |================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1374067 |=============================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1217254 |=============================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 5.902 |================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.1 |=================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 9913.92 |=============================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 45.0 |================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 29.48 |================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 45.0 |================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 29.46 |================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 5.955 |================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 8.990 |================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 27.92 |================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 46.4 |================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 28.59 |================================= SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 58.92 |================================= Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 64018 |================================= Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 87205 |================================= Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 65370 |================================= Apache Cassandra 4.0 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 65227 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 40436 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.025 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 662 |=================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1.514 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 256975 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.194 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 263607 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.380 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 235973 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1.060 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 700 |=================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 71.51 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 182607 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 2.738 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 37090 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.027 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 693 |=================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 144.44 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 636 |=================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 393.36 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 541 |=================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 924.34 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 601 |=================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1.669 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 241731 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.207 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 32486 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.031 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 250180 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.400 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 244580 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1.022 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 6556 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 7.626 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 164928 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 3.032 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 530 |=================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1.887 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 201432 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.248 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 6949 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.144 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 3770 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.265 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 7682 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 13.12 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 7678 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 32.56 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 7935 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 63.02 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 210315 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.475 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 187016 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1.337 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 4888 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 10.31 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 178365 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 2.803 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 367 |=================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 2.755 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 138749 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.360 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 377 |=================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 2.732 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 112995 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.442 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 7777 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 12.88 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 9657 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 25.89 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 9155 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 54.64 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 133128 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.752 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 115620 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 2.162 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 4637 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 10.79 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 101148 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 4.943 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 114516 |================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.873 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 98429 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 2.540 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 4424 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 11.31 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 87858 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 5.691 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 6164 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 16.28 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 6743 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 37.20 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 6665 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 75.24 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 5473 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 18.28 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 6481 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 38.63 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 6446 |================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 77.88 |================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 1131 |================================== MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 8 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 586 |=================================== MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 574 |=================================== MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 534 |=================================== MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 460 |=================================== MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 376 |=================================== MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 323 |=================================== MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 339 |=================================== MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 1024 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 111 |=================================== MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 2048 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 106 |=================================== MariaDB 10.8.2 Clients: 4096 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 100 |=================================== ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 553567 |================================ Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 11.31 |================================= simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 2.74 |================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.90 |================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 3.74 |================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 4.20 |================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.11930984 |============================ Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 512GB SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 . 0.00068678 |============================