Core i9 10900K BHI Benchmarks for a future article. Core i9 10900K: Processor: Intel Core i9-10900K @ 5.30GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER (F21c BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB (1780/875MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: MX279, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Comet Lake PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.17.0-051700rc7daily20220309-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2 (LLVM 12.0.1), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline: Processor: Intel Core i9-10900K @ 5.30GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER (F21c BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB (1780/875MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: MX279, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Comet Lake PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.17.0-051700rc7daily20220309-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2 (LLVM 12.0.1), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Renaissance 0.12 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 11339.6 |=================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 11411.1 |=================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 118.39 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 119.38 |==================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 189.04 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 189.82 |==================================== WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 179.01 |================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 191.99 |==================================== KeyDB 6.2.0 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 854137.69 |================================= Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 854208.77 |================================= Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 40.0 |====================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 39.9 |====================================== Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 161 |======================================= Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 159 |======================================= Sockperf 3.7 Test: Latency Ping Pong usec < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 2.861 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 2.907 |===================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 3088 |====================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 2999 |===================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 1786132.1 |================================= Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 1777456.9 |================================= Sockperf 3.7 Test: Throughput Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 736807 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 697977 |================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 1989544.3 |================================= Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 2005862.4 |================================= Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 53.68 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 55.04 |===================================== Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 194 |======================================= Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 192 |======================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 2743.7 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 2728.3 |==================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.29 Type: Random Write - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 296333 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 274167 |================================= Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 120 |====================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 122 |======================================= SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 43.76 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 44.94 |===================================== Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox Score < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 2719 |====================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 2736 |====================================== Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome Score < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 2898 |====================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 2915 |====================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.29 Type: Random Read - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 257000 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 256667 |==================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: IO_uring Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 31670.78 |================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 30418.91 |================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 265295.99 |================================= Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 195354.99 |======================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Finagle HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 2087.7 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 2084.4 |==================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 25.95 |=================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 27.42 |===================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 439.4 |===================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 437.6 |===================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 25.35 |=================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 26.70 |===================================== Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 855.1 |===================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 856.4 |===================================== Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 614.5 |===================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 615.7 |===================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.22.1 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 1401579 |=================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 1381411 |================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 315.55 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 317.10 |==================================== GIMP 2.10.24 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 10.33 |===================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 10.47 |===================================== GIMP 2.10.24 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 10.33 |===================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 10.41 |===================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 25.3 |====================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 25.3 |====================================== GIMP 2.10.24 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 6.983 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 7.083 |===================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 25.76 |===================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 25.56 |===================================== Darktable 3.6.0 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 3.899 |===================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 3.896 |===================================== Darktable 3.6.0 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 3.405 |===================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 3.409 |===================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 42.30 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 43.35 |===================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 52.3 |====================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 51.0 |===================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 42.31 |==================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 43.05 |===================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K ................... 52.3 |====================================== Core i9 10900K + eibrs,retpoline . 51.4 |=====================================