mantacpumassive 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6248R testing with a TYAN S7106GM2NR-HOV-B (V8.108 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. performance: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6248R @ 4.00GHz (48 Cores / 96 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S7106GM2NR-HOV-B (V8.108 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 12 x 16384 MB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE, Disk: 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZQLB1T9HAJR-00007 + 2 x 480GB INTEL SSDSC2BB48, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Mellanox MT27800 + 2 x Mellanox MT27710 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-96-generic (x86_64), Vulkan: 1.0.2, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 800x600 BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better performance . 1951696 |======================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better performance . 33396 |========================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 1820.36 |======================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 613.84 |========================================================= Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 1279.66 |======================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 33213.62 |======================================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 32208.46 |======================================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 28126.72 |======================================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 32314.65 |======================================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 31391.03 |======================================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 28671.94 |======================================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 32217.92 |======================================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 25470.73 |======================================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 32852.18 |======================================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 30044.47 |======================================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 7256.1 |========================================================= Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 13382.9 |======================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 4979.07 |======================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 4790.15 |======================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 4778.29 |======================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 4788.05 |======================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 4997.57 |======================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 5054.76 |======================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 5297.68 |======================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 5321.38 |======================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 16.96 |========================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 6.417 |========================================================== Sockperf 3.7 Test: Throughput Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 325746 |========================================================= Sockperf 3.7 Test: Latency Ping Pong usec < Lower Is Better performance . 4.456 |========================================================== Sockperf 3.7 Test: Latency Under Load usec < Lower Is Better performance . 26.58 |========================================================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better performance . 27.95 |========================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better performance . 77730.96 |======================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better performance . 5770.03 |======================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better performance . 26723.10 |======================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better performance . 29907.49 |======================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better performance . 97529.33 |======================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better performance . 115078.84 |====================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better performance . 29977.31 |======================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ptrans HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Random Access HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 3368 |=========================================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 22.74 |========================================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 1.401657 |======================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI-Q Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 3.001153 |======================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 407.06 |========================================================= CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 18.07 |========================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 61.59 |========================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 50.19 |========================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 7.544 |========================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 11.65 |========================================================== CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better performance . 25.5 |=========================================================== NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better performance . 0.40706 |======================================================== Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 21.06 |========================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 38 |============================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 103 |============================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 459 |============================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 1570 |=========================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 411 |============================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 537 |============================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 211 |============================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 1005 |=========================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better performance . 7172.0 |========================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better performance . 4805.2 |========================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better performance . 57967 |========================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better performance . 17567 |========================================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 179.74 |========================================================= Timed HMMer Search 3.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 135.78 |========================================================= Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 10.53 |========================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Test: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better performance . 11.54 |========================================================== BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better performance . 4.30 |=========================================================== Go Benchmarks Test: http Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: json Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: build Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: garbage Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better performance . 2040.45 |======================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better performance . 978.80 |========================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better performance . 1374.50 |======================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better performance . 1654.69 |======================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better performance . 4605.87 |======================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better performance . 1588.39 |======================================================== Java Gradle Build Gradle Build: Reactor Seconds < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better performance . 3359 |=========================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better performance . 4381 |=========================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Eclipse msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better performance . 3379 |=========================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better performance . 5060 |=========================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better performance . 905.0 |========================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Twitter Finagle ms < Lower Is Better performance . 5488.0 |========================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better performance . 2094.7 |========================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better performance . 682.2 |========================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better performance . 12075.2 |======================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better performance . 4228.1 |========================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.12 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better performance . 17724.1 |======================================================== CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 3377.08 |======================================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 28301.90 |======================================================= CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 45958.06 |======================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 2809.5 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 2657.1 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 1478.3 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 2668.8 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 75.3 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 2202.1 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 810.1 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 2836.2 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 758.5 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 2826.7 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 41.2 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 2235.2 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 90.05 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 86.00 |========================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 3826.60 |======================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 3827.63 |======================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 347.51 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 348.51 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 432.80 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 429.43 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 137.02 |========================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 137.09 |========================================================= Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 7830827 |======================================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better performance . 75610 |========================================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Traditional DES Real C/S > Higher Is Better performance . 502293667 |====================================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better performance . 7220667 |======================================================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 9445 |=========================================================== Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better performance . 673 |============================================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better performance . 403 |============================================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better performance . 821 |============================================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better performance . 1193 |=========================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better performance . 375.36 |========================================================= dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better performance . 950.07 |========================================================= TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better performance . 946.30 |========================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 15.31 |========================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 15.59 |========================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 61.81 |========================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 63.59 |========================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 32.13 |========================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 49.47 |========================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 135.00 |========================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 186.87 |========================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 1.320 |========================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 17.65 |========================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 5.650 |========================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 99.41 |========================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 27.69 |========================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 270.72 |========================================================= SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 474.84 |========================================================= SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 359.46 |========================================================= SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 365.07 |========================================================= SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 301.54 |========================================================= VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 4.81 |=========================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 10.42 |========================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 10.05 |========================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 20.62 |========================================================== x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 170.36 |========================================================= x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 22.99 |========================================================== x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 67.56 |========================================================== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better performance . 3565.04 |======================================================== 7-Zip Compression 21.06 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better performance . 262509 |========================================================= 7-Zip Compression 21.06 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better performance . 235813 |========================================================= Stockfish 13 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 117760017 |====================================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better performance . 120919139 |====================================================== Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 688188318 |====================================================== ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better performance . 1403054 |======================================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 21.86 |========================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 728.90 |========================================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.16 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 30.87 |========================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.16 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 315.67 |========================================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 198.50 |========================================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 265.08 |========================================================= Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 41.68 |========================================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 17.09 |========================================================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 Seconds < Lower Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 41.36 |========================================================== Primesieve 7.7 1e12 Prime Number Generation Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 5.331 |========================================================== Rust Mandelbrot Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 41.54 |========================================================== Rust Prime Benchmark Prime Number Test To 200,000,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 2.823 |========================================================== oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better performance . 332.70 |========================================================= XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 21.87 |========================================================== Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 25.56 |========================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 18.08 |========================================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 9.531 |========================================================== Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 42.84 |========================================================== m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 19.66 |========================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 54.36 |========================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 73.80 |========================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 114.18 |========================================================= Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 727.84 |========================================================= Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 229.37 |========================================================= R Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 0.3689 |========================================================= Tachyon 0.99.2 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 39.87 |========================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: m7m kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: deep kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: skein kH/s > Higher Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: sha256t kH/s > Higher Is Better glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better performance . 48.23 |========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better performance . 1.90474 |======================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better performance . 47.90 |========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better performance . 1.91041 |======================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better performance . 13.24 |========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better performance . 1.65259 |======================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better performance . 1.66197 |======================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better performance . 9.422 |========================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better performance . 77.87 |========================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better performance . 67.64 |========================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads ns < Lower Is Better performance . 78.27 |========================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads ns < Lower Is Better performance . 81.13 |========================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better performance . 13914972550 |==================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better performance . 12240.5 |======================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better performance . 820996.3 |======================================================= Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 1612393 |======================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 687442 |========================================================= Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 3505.6 |========================================================= Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 3510.9 |========================================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 754.0 |========================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 735.9 |========================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 409.2 |========================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 415.4 |========================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 2856.1 |========================================================= Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 2857.6 |========================================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 753.7 |========================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 737.4 |========================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 410.4 |========================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better performance . 414.9 |========================================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better performance . 178.10 |========================================================= MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 16576 |========================================================== MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 9065 |=========================================================== MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 2060 |=========================================================== MariaDB 10.6.4 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 810 |============================================================ Tensorflow Build: Cifar10 Seconds < Lower Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 67.36 |========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 32.82 |========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 329.77 |========================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Function Objects Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 15.12 |========================================================== Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 3.491 |========================================================== Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 4.413 |========================================================== Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 0.073 |========================================================== Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 2.016 |========================================================== GNU Octave Benchmark 5.2.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 9.866 |========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 2281961.06 |===================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 1964524.45 |===================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 1542707.88 |===================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 2291911.86 |===================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 1763011.32 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better performance . 8921.44 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better performance . 60451.52 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better performance . 87011.50 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better performance . 9388309.01 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better performance . 8633.10 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better performance . 2697.22 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better performance . 41256463.38 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better performance . 4722071.01 |===================================================== PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Training - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better performance . 0.15 |=========================================================== PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better performance . 29.26 |========================================================== PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Training - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better performance . 0.50 |=========================================================== PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better performance . 4.82 |=========================================================== Blender 3.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 36.27 |========================================================== Blender 3.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 101.58 |========================================================= Blender 3.0 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 50.33 |========================================================== Blender 3.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 391.05 |========================================================= Blender 3.0 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 121.90 |========================================================= ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better performance . 151 |============================================================ Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: Memory MiB/sec > Higher Is Better performance . 11606.18 |======================================================= Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 89551.60 |======================================================= Xsbench 2017-07-06 Lookups/s > Higher Is Better performance . 8815603 |======================================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Prepend Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Replace Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: EXPoSE Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 1029.29 |======================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Relative Entropy Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 14.41 |========================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Windowed Gaussian Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 7.164 |========================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Earthgecko Skyline Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 85.88 |========================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Bayesian Changepoint Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 32.63 |========================================================== PyMongo Inserts Seconds < Lower Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT QUIPs > Higher Is Better performance . 392990499.00 |=================================================== Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: DOUBLE QUIPs > Higher Is Better performance . 885833262.63 |=================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 65482.91 |======================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 241311.97 |====================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 195530.89 |====================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 208731.89 |====================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 212726.20 |====================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 213036.61 |====================================================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 100 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 200 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 10873.22 |======================================================= Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better performance . 20781.45 |======================================================= Geekbench 5 Test: Multi Core Score > Higher Is Better Geekbench 5 Test: Single Core Score > Higher Is Better Novabench Test: CPU Score > Higher Is Better Novabench Test: RAM Score > Higher Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better performance . 678562 |========================================================= Scikit-Learn 0.22.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 9.692 |========================================================== Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images Seconds < Lower Is Better performance . 29.81 |========================================================== BRL-CAD 7.32.2 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better performance . 362181 |=========================================================