12600K Massive Intel Core i5-12600K testing with a ASUS PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 (0605 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 21.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Core i5 12600K: Processor: Intel Core i5-12600K @ 6.30GHz (10 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 (0605 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: Realtek ALC897, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Device 7af0 OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.15.7-051507-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 22.0.0-devel (git-d80c7f3 2021-11-14 impish-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 13.0.0 256 bits), Vulkan: 1.2.197, Compiler: GCC 12.0.0 20211212, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Application Start-up Time 3.4.0 Background I/O Mix: Only Sequential Reads - Application To Start: GNOME Terminal - Disk Target: Default Test Directory Application Start-up Time 3.4.0 Background I/O Mix: Sequential Reads + Writes - Application To Start: GNOME Terminal - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 8.7 |========================================================= Flexible IO Tester 3.25 Type: Random Read - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2979 |======================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.25 Type: Random Read - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 763000 |====================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.25 Type: Random Write - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1956 |======================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.25 Type: Random Write - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 501000 |====================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.25 Type: Sequential Read - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2082 |======================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.25 Type: Sequential Read - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 533000 |====================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.25 Type: Sequential Write - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2035 |======================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.25 Type: Sequential Write - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 521000 |====================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 965.2 |======================================================= FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2467.3 |====================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 431.8 |======================================================= FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync Files/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3855.6 |====================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 657347 |====================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 32050 |======================================================= Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 1 MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 614.02 |====================================================== Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 6 MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2333.48 |===================================================== IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1548.23 |===================================================== Threaded I/O Tester 20170503 Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 32MB - Thread Count: 4 MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 16.76 |======================================================= Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3307.41 |===================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1060.37 |===================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5115.08 |===================================================== Pjdfstest Seconds < Lower Is Better Unpacking The Linux Kernel linux-4.15.tar.xz Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4.165 |======================================================= PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 10000 |======================================================= Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Idle Latency ns < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 24.6 |======================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 63051.01 |==================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 65971.11 |==================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 70491.59 |==================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 55018.3 |===================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 57508.32 |==================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 63055.3 |===================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 65710.3 |===================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 70435.8 |===================================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 54622 |======================================================= Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 57112.6 |===================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 38611.84 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 33960.16 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 33686.71 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 38262.21 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 36053.02 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 38468.8 |===================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 33919.85 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 34136.68 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 39041.79 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 36315.27 |==================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better Stream-Dynamic 1.0 MB/s > Higher Is Better Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 27341.6 |===================================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 27976.9 |===================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 23417.15 |==================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 23120.51 |==================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 23226.93 |==================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 23450.33 |==================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 13026.2 |===================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 12946.88 |==================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 12922.29 |==================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 12910.85 |==================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 25.52 |======================================================= t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 9.375 |======================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.0535 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.0532 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.057 |======================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.0817 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.0689 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.0212 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.0213 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.0228 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.038 |======================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.021 |======================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.036 |======================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.0209 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.023 |======================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.042 |======================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.0785 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.0705 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.071 |======================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.0732 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.1009 |====================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.0829 |====================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 2 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 4 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 2 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 4 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 2 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 4 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 16 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 16 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 16 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 2 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 4 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 2 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 4 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 2 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 4 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 16 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 16 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 16 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 2 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 4 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 2 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 4 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 2 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 4 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 16 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 16 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 16 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 100 |========================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 5 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 500 |========================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 100 |========================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 5 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 500 |========================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 100 |========================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 5 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 500 |========================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1000 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 5 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5000 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 10 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1000 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 20 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2000 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1000 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 5 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5000 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 10 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1000 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 20 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2000 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1000 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 5 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5000 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 10 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1000 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 20 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2000 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 10 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 9999 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 20 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 19999 |======================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 10 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 10000 |======================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 20 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 20000 |======================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 10 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 10000 |======================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 20 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 20000 |======================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 110202 |====================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 5 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 140285 |====================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1.05 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 5 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5.24 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 107791 |====================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 5 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 137538 |====================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1.05 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 5 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5.24 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 98234 |======================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 5 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 138179 |====================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1.05 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 5 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5.24 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 10 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 125127 |====================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 20 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 121699 |====================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 10 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 10.5 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 20 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 21 |========================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 10 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 124723 |====================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 20 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 122136 |====================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 10 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 10.5 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 30 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 20 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 21 |========================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 10 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 124276 |====================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 20 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 123139 |====================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 10 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 10.5 |======================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 60 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 20 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 21 |========================================================== Nuttcp 8.1.4 Test: 10G+ UDP - Server Address: localhost Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Nuttcp 8.1.4 Test: TCP Transfer - Default - Server Address: localhost Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Nuttcp 8.1.4 Test: TCP Transfer - Server To Client - Server Address: localhost Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Netperf 2.7.0 Server: localhost - Test: TCP Send File - Duration: 10 Seconds Netperf 2.7.0 Server: localhost - Test: TCP Request Response - Duration: 10 Seconds Netperf 2.7.0 Server: localhost - Test: UDP Request Response - Duration: 10 Seconds Netperf 2.7.0 Server: localhost - Test: TCP Stream - Client To Server - Duration: 10 Seconds Netperf 2.7.0 Server: localhost - Test: TCP Stream - Server To Client - Duration: 10 Seconds Netperf 2.7.0 Server: localhost - Test: UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - Duration: 10 Seconds Loopback TCP Network Performance Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 9.057 |======================================================= Sockperf 3.7 Test: Throughput Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1105555 |===================================================== Sockperf 3.7 Test: Latency Ping Pong usec < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2.056 |======================================================= Sockperf 3.7 Test: Latency Under Load usec < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2.304 |======================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Epoll Wait ops/sec > Higher Is Better perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Hash ops/sec > Higher Is Better perf-bench Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB ops/sec > Higher Is Better perf-bench Benchmark: Memset 1MB ops/sec > Higher Is Better perf-bench Benchmark: Sched Pipe ops/sec > Higher Is Better perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi ops/sec > Higher Is Better perf-bench Benchmark: Syscall Basic ops/sec > Higher Is Better OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 7.937286 |==================================================== OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 7.820129 |==================================================== OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 25.97 |======================================================= OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 14.90 |======================================================= OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 46.13 |======================================================= GNU MPC 1.1.0 Multi-Precision Benchmark Global Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 14000 |======================================================= C-Blosc 2.0 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 25356.3 |===================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4483.8 |====================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 6242401 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2722861 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4894297 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2693445 |===================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2368.77 |===================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 826.20 |====================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 545.17 |====================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 7759.18 |===================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 7.26157 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 31529.72 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5790.22 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 905.27 |====================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 904.53 |====================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 10026.91 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 28743.73 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 19061.41 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 8943.36 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 7042.28 |===================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 71.06 |======================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 9.85275 |===================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 20.15 |======================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ptrans GB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4.55507 |===================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4.37760 |===================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Random Access GUP/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.05435 |===================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency usecs < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.29423 |===================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2.81445 |===================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 27772.38 |==================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 92.94 |======================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3.494048 |==================================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI-Q Seconds < Lower Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 16.26 |======================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 60.63 |======================================================= miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small CG Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 7797.38 |===================================================== CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 124.25 |====================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 186.94 |====================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 58.41 |======================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 91.21 |======================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 15.14 |======================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 11.87 |======================================================= CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.2 Input: Fayalite-FIST Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 443.94 |====================================================== CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 6.1 |========================================================= NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1.20040 |===================================================== Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 11.39 |======================================================= Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2.3 Seconds < Lower Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Covariance Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2.767 |======================================================= PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Correlation Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2.794 |======================================================= PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2.232 |======================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4.43 |======================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: air Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1.13 |======================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mdbx Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3.3 |========================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: doduc Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3.88 |======================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1.96 |======================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: tfft2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 14.45 |======================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: aermod Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3.2 |========================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: rnflow Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 11.01 |======================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: induct2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 12.87 |======================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 7.88 |======================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: capacita Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 6.57 |======================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: channel2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 32.64 |======================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: fatigue2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 24.8 |======================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: gas_dyn2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 34.07 |======================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: test_fpu2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 15.13 |======================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mp_prop_design Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 30.87 |======================================================= toyBrot Fractal Generator 2020-11-18 Implementation: TBB ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 30212 |======================================================= toyBrot Fractal Generator 2020-11-18 Implementation: OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 35566 |======================================================= toyBrot Fractal Generator 2020-11-18 Implementation: C++ Tasks ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 31830 |======================================================= toyBrot Fractal Generator 2020-11-18 Implementation: C++ Threads ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 30770 |======================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 60 |========================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 158 |========================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 718 |========================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2386 |======================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 138 |========================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2628 |======================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 159 |========================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 592 |========================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 645 |========================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 766 |========================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 284 |========================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 904 |========================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 355 |========================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1389 |======================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 299893900 |=================================================== FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 62507.24 |==================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 20558 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 20035 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 22796 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 20075 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 19340 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 20056 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 20034 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 18448 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 16394 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 15464 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 20034 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 19492 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 19589 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 16479 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 13729 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 13540 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 30238 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 38462 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 79770 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 80880 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 47397 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 64354 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 81298 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 64713 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 66059 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 51821 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 101430 |====================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 101910 |====================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 83774 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 59121 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 48851 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 38936 |======================================================= Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 224.12 |====================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 43.67 |======================================================= Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 160.86 |====================================================== NWChem 7.0.2 Input: C240 Buckyball Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 6152.5 |====================================================== QMCPACK 3.11 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed HMMer Search 3.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 98.73 |======================================================= Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 25.57 |======================================================= Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 96.15 |======================================================= Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 8.284 |======================================================= Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2019-03-24 Input: Dust 2D tau100.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 115 |========================================================= OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 140.96 |====================================================== Quantum ESPRESSO 6.8 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1434.13 |===================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 6.763 |======================================================= LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 6.543 |======================================================= LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 6452.73 |===================================================== BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4.53 |======================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Default Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1.064 |======================================================= WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100 Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1.687 |======================================================= WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 12.21 |======================================================= WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5.492 |======================================================= WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 25.84 |======================================================= libgav1 0.16.3 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better libgav1 0.16.3 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better libgav1 0.16.3 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better libgav1 0.16.3 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 7965.9 |====================================================== Go Benchmarks Test: http Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: json Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: build Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Go Benchmarks Test: garbage Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3323 |======================================================== Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 7041 |======================================================== Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.1 Test: Square Plain C++ IPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 214100 |====================================================== Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.1 Test: Square Assembly Optimized IPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 244400 |====================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4016.51 |===================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1282.85 |===================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2797.50 |===================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3731.59 |===================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 9182.57 |===================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3088.07 |===================================================== Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5.708 |======================================================= Java Gradle Build Gradle Build: Reactor Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 197.27 |====================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2781 |======================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2066 |======================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Eclipse msec < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2921 |======================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2165 |======================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 716.3 |======================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 514.7 |======================================================= Renaissance 0.12 Test: ALS Movie Lens ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5803.4 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1488.7 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1309.6 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5795.2 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3345.3 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Finagle HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1354.0 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2580.0 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 8925.8 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1996.3 |====================================================== Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 19787.5 |===================================================== BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 86370083.2 |================================================== CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5344.03 |===================================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 52838.93 |==================================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 64738.02 |==================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 12293.57 |==================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 13511.1 |===================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 74.4 |======================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 12667.6 |===================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 72.59 |======================================================= LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 12830.1 |===================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3394.9 |====================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4676.4 |====================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 406.1 |======================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4869.4 |====================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 34.2 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2787.2 |====================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 669.6 |======================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5035.1 |====================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 572.5 |======================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5209.9 |====================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 29.7 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2905.3 |====================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better srsLTE 20.10.1 Test: OFDM_Test Mb/s > Higher Is Better srsLTE 20.10.1 Test: PHY_DL_Test Mb/s > Higher Is Better srsRAN 21.04 Test: OFDM_Test Mb/s > Higher Is Better srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAM Mb/s > Higher Is Better srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAM Mb/s > Higher Is Better srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAM Mb/s > Higher Is Better srsRAN 21.04 Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAM Mb/s > Higher Is Better srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAM Mb/s > Higher Is Better srsRAN 21.04 Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 270 PRB SISO 256-QAM Mb/s > Higher Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: aes256 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: chacha Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: sha512 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: poly1305-aes Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2298.51 |===================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 704.22 |====================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 644.08 |====================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2710.07 |===================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4713.83 |===================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2720.36 |===================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2628.83 |===================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 767.94 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5233.67 |===================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 7053.05 |===================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3341.62 |===================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 MiB/s > Higher Is Better LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: Five Back to Back FIR Filters MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1002.1 |====================================================== LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: FM Deemphasis Filter MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 638.1 |======================================================= LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: Hilbert Transform MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 214.8 |======================================================= LuaRadio 0.9.1 Test: Complex Phase MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 833.5 |======================================================= LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 52.12 |======================================================= Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 12668286 |==================================================== TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2032391 |===================================================== ArrayFire 3.7 Test: BLAS CPU GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 462.21 |====================================================== ArrayFire 3.7 Test: Conjugate Gradient CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 14.51 |======================================================= John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4691 |======================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2.12 |======================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1.48 |======================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3.54 |======================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1.68 |======================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 9.52 |======================================================== Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 779 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1305 |======================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 219 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 317 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1401 |======================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 326 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1309 |======================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3.9544 |====================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 68.13 |======================================================= oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4.45106 |===================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 7.92168 |===================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 286.52 |====================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 12600K . 32.77 |======================================================= dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 18.87 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3.14 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1.58 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 23.26 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1.68 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 18.52 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 4.57 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 250 |========================================================= TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 773.34 |====================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.12 |======================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2.43 |======================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 11.71 |======================================================= AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 10.03 |======================================================= AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 55.44 |======================================================= AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 74 |========================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 81.52 |======================================================= Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 14.82 |======================================================= Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 16.74 |======================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 9.44 |======================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 9.57 |======================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 47 |========================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 48.34 |======================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 26.11 |======================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 43.87 |======================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 111 |========================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 189.91 |====================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 0.45 |======================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 2.476 |======================================================= rav1e 0.5 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 3.256 |======================================================= rav1e 0.5 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 10.50 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 1.811 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 18.64 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 5.826 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 76.24 |======================================================= SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 11.26 |======================================================= SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 157.4 |======================================================= SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 313.81 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 202.79 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 212.94 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 12600K . 160.78 |======================================================