Intel Core i3-7100 testing with a Gigabyte B250M-DS3H-CF (F9 BIOS) and Gigabyte Intel HD 630 KBL GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2112058-TJ-7100DEC7665
7100 Dec
Intel Core i3-7100 testing with a Gigabyte B250M-DS3H-CF (F9 BIOS) and Gigabyte Intel HD 630 KBL GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
A:
Processor: Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3.90GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte B250M-DS3H-CF (F9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th + B250, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 250GB Western Digital WDS250G1B0A-, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel HD 630 KBL GT2 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411
OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-55-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
B:
Processor: Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3.90GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte B250M-DS3H-CF (F9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th + B250, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 250GB Western Digital WDS250G1B0A-, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel HD 630 KBL GT2 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411
OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-55-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
yquake2 8.0
Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 55.2 |=====================================================================
B . 54.6 |====================================================================
yquake2 8.0
Renderer: OpenGL 1.x - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 114.5 |====================================================================
B . 113.9 |====================================================================
yquake2 8.0
Renderer: OpenGL 3.x - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 151.3 |====================================================================
B . 100.6 |=============================================
yquake2 8.0
Renderer: Software CPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 96.0 |=====================================================================
B . 96.3 |=====================================================================
GLmark2 2021.08.30
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Score > Higher Is Better
A . 513 |=====================================================================
B . 517 |======================================================================
Sockperf 3.7
Test: Throughput
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 415111 |==========================================================
B . 479760 |===================================================================
Sockperf 3.7
Test: Latency Ping Pong
usec < Lower Is Better
A . 3.980 |====================================================================
B . 3.904 |===================================================================
Sockperf 3.7
Test: Latency Under Load
usec < Lower Is Better
A . 17.28 |=========================================================
B . 20.72 |====================================================================
LeelaChessZero 0.28
Backend: BLAS
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 560 |======================================================================
B . 355 |============================================
LeelaChessZero 0.28
Backend: Eigen
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 514 |======================================================================
B . 348 |===============================================
BLAKE2 20170307
Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better
A . 5.78 |=====================================================================
B . 5.77 |=====================================================================
simdjson 1.0
Throughput Test: Kostya
GB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 2.48 |=====================================================================
B . 2.49 |=====================================================================
simdjson 1.0
Throughput Test: LargeRandom
GB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 0.86 |=====================================================================
B . 0.85 |====================================================================
simdjson 1.0
Throughput Test: PartialTweets
GB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 3.68 |=====================================================================
B . 3.67 |=====================================================================
simdjson 1.0
Throughput Test: DistinctUserID
GB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 4.16 |=====================================================================
B . 4.15 |=====================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 685.3 |====================================================================
B . 617.1 |=============================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 3264.2 |===================================================================
B . 3196.3 |==================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 118.3 |====================================================================
B . 97.5 |========================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 3330.3 |===================================================================
B . 3206.0 |================================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 11.70 |====================================================================
B . 6.45 |=====================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 2757.7 |===================================================================
B . 2514.9 |=============================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 298.3 |====================================================================
B . 193.4 |============================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 3401.9 |===================================================================
B . 67.8 |=
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 111.5 |====================================================================
B . 46.0 |============================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 3474.0 |===================================================================
B . 3205.1 |==============================================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 9.77 |=====================================================================
B . 4.59 |================================
Zstd Compression
Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
MB/s > Higher Is Better
A . 2867.4 |===================================================================
B . 2546.9 |============================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1
Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A . 12.05 |====================================================================
B . 4.16 |=======================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1
Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A . 4.14 |=====================================================================
B . 2.00 |=================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1
Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A . 0.6 |======================================================================
B . 0.6 |======================================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1
Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A . 51.32 |====================================================================
B . 35.66 |===============================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1
Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A . 51.13 |====================================================================
B . 39.34 |====================================================
JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1
Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A . 21.24 |====================================================================
B . 13.10 |==========================================
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1
CPU Threads: 1
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A . 43.94 |====================================================================
B . 35.43 |=======================================================
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1
CPU Threads: All
MP/s > Higher Is Better
A . 81.02 |====================================================================
B . 61.43 |====================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 0.03 |=====================================================================
B . 0.02 |==============================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 1.12 |=====================================================================
B . 0.38 |=======================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 3.28 |=====================================================================
B . 2.78 |==========================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 2.24 |=====================================================================
B . 0.64 |====================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 11.40 |====================================================================
B . 3.19 |===================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 16.45 |====================================================================
B . 3.87 |================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 18.52 |====================================================================
B . 15.56 |=========================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 0.08 |=====================================================================
B . 0.03 |==========================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 3.11 |=====================================================================
B . 1.10 |========================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 4.22 |=====================================================================
B . 4.21 |=====================================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 7.22 |=====================================================================
B . 2.76 |==========================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 41.16 |====================================================================
B . 36.08 |============================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 53.62 |====================================================================
B . 46.20 |===========================================================
AOM AV1 3.2
Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 59.03 |====================================================================
B . 50.22 |==========================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 1.50 |=====================================================================
B . 0.92 |==========================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 8.49 |=====================================================================
B . 8.46 |=====================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 3.44 |=====================================================================
B . 3.17 |================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 6.05 |=====================================================================
B . 5.26 |============================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 16.61 |===================================================================
B . 16.79 |====================================================================
Kvazaar 2.1
Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 28.53 |====================================================================
B . 28.18 |===================================================================
7-Zip Compression 21.06
Test: Compression Rating
MIPS > Higher Is Better
A . 15682 |====================================================================
B . 14049 |=============================================================
7-Zip Compression 21.06
Test: Decompression Rating
MIPS > Higher Is Better
A . 11819 |====================================================================
B . 10080 |==========================================================
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9
Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512
Render Ratio > Higher Is Better
A . 0.741059 |=================================================================
B . 0.739060 |=================================================================
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9
Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 1024
Render Ratio > Higher Is Better
A . 0.750518 |=================================================================
B . 0.750205 |=================================================================
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9
Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512
Render Ratio > Higher Is Better
A . 0.712793 |=================================================================
B . 0.710422 |=================================================================
Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9
Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024
Render Ratio > Higher Is Better
A . 0.721684 |=================================================================
B . 0.723144 |=================================================================
Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 3067.60 |==================================================================
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 434.49 |===================================================================
B . 390.94 |============================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0
Build System: Ninja
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 3503.01 |==================================================================
B . 3108.63 |===========================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0
Build System: Unix Makefiles
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 3530.34 |==================================================================
B . 3141.29 |===========================================================
Primesieve 7.7
1e12 Prime Number Generation
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 107.04 |===================================================================
B . 106.73 |===================================================================
FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 18.97 |====================================================================
B . 19.02 |====================================================================
Tachyon 0.99b6
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 426.35 |===================================================================
B . 419.37 |==================================================================
Google SynthMark 20201109
Test: VoiceMark_100
Voices > Higher Is Better
A . 618.52 |===================================================================
B . 612.02 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Magi
kH/s > Higher Is Better
A . 51.01 |===================================================================
B . 52.07 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: x25x
kH/s > Higher Is Better
A . 59.03 |====================================================================
B . 58.99 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Deepcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
A . 2018.40 |==================================================================
B . 2016.88 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Ringcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
A . 437.02 |==================================================================
B . 441.56 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Blake-2 S
kH/s > Higher Is Better
A . 72010 |====================================================================
B . 71210 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Garlicoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
A . 507.29 |===================================================================
B . 504.70 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Skeincoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
A . 8838.65 |==================================================================
B . 8814.25 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl
kH/s > Higher Is Better
A . 2867.69 |==================================================================
B . 2876.42 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits
kH/s > Higher Is Better
A . 5431.40 |===============================================================
B . 5652.26 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite
kH/s > Higher Is Better
A . 10160 |================================================================
B . 10760 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.18
Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
A . 14340 |====================================================================
B . 14400 |====================================================================
OpenSSL 3.0
Algorithm: SHA256
byte/s > Higher Is Better
A . 654906210 |==============================================================
B . 680393240 |================================================================
OpenSSL 3.0
Algorithm: RSA4096
sign/s > Higher Is Better
A . 587.6 |===================================================================
B . 598.9 |====================================================================
OpenSSL 3.0
Algorithm: RSA4096
verify/s > Higher Is Better
A . 38900.7 |=================================================================
B . 39356.2 |==================================================================
OpenSSL
sign/s > Higher Is Better
A . 589.5 |===================================================================
B . 599.0 |====================================================================
OpenSSL
verify/s > Higher Is Better
A . 38793.3 |==================================================================
B . 39051.8 |==================================================================
KeyDB 6.2.0
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
A . 126606.53 |===============================================
B . 174230.58 |================================================================
ASTC Encoder 3.2
Preset: Medium
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 9.0227 |===================================================================
B . 9.0430 |===================================================================
ASTC Encoder 3.2
Preset: Thorough
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 30.06 |====================================================================
B . 30.05 |====================================================================
ASTC Encoder 3.2
Preset: Exhaustive
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 276.18 |===================================================================
B . 275.65 |===================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: MMAP
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 9.89 |===================================================================
B . 10.06 |====================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: NUMA
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 44.35 |====================================================================
B . 44.16 |====================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: MEMFD
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 88.23 |==================================================================
B . 91.55 |====================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Atomic
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 233274.94 |================================================================
B . 202040.05 |=======================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Crypto
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 424.59 |===================================================================
B . 425.14 |===================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Malloc
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 10710276.61 |==============================================================
B . 10756201.03 |==============================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: RdRand
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 5580.24 |==================================================================
B . 5529.45 |=================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Forking
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 17294.51 |=================================================================
B . 16923.22 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: IO_uring
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 12475.88 |===============================================================
B . 12896.94 |=================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: SENDFILE
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 26426.88 |=================================================================
B . 26498.96 |=================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: CPU Cache
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 258.97 |===================================================================
B . 256.27 |==================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: CPU Stress
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 4253.03 |==================================================================
B . 4232.63 |==================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Semaphores
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 284316.37 |================================================================
B . 284435.45 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Matrix Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 9537.27 |==================================================================
B . 8687.13 |============================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Vector Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 6864.91 |==================================================================
B . 6870.00 |==================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Memory Copying
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 764.29 |===================================================================
B . 736.89 |=================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Socket Activity
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 2304.29 |==================================================================
B . 2177.33 |==============================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Context Switching
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 761329.65 |================================================================
B . 759779.58 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Glibc C String Functions
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 266272.51 |================================================================
B . 265481.49 |================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 26.8 |=====================================================================
B . 26.7 |=====================================================================
Stress-NG 0.13.02
Test: System V Message Passing
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
A . 1979668.49 |===============================================================
B . 1961038.31 |==============================================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 776401.25 |================================================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 816003.94 |================================================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: GET
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 661598.6 |=================================================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: MIX
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
A . 489939.29 |================================================================
Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark
Test: SET
Blender 3.0
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 707.60 |===================================================================
B . 693.29 |==================================================================
Blender 3.0
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
B . 1908.64 |==================================================================
Blender 3.0
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 1990.77 |==================================================================
B . 966.63 |================================
Blender 3.0
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 2559.64 |==================================================================
B . 2524.68 |=================================================================
nginx 1.21.1
Concurrent Requests: 1000
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
RAR Compression 6.0.2
Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 114.30 |===================================================================
B . 77.83 |==============================================
GnuPG 2.2.27
2.7GB Sample File Encryption
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 73.28 |==================================================================
B . 75.80 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.004 |====================================================================
B . 0.004 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.089 |====================================================================
B . 0.061 |===============================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.023 |====================================================================
B . 0.023 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.388 |====================================================================
B . 0.262 |==============================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.109 |====================================================================
B . 0.084 |====================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 1.983 |====================================================================
B . 1.251 |===========================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.016 |====================================================================
B . 0.016 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.086 |====================================================================
B . 0.086 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.092 |====================================================================
B . 0.091 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.167 |====================================================================
B . 0.167 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.022 |=================================================================
B . 0.023 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.720 |====================================================================
B . 0.109 |==========
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.066 |====================================================================
B . 0.066 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.468 |====================================================================
B . 0.387 |========================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.264 |====================================================================
B . 0.263 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 1.737 |====================================================================
B . 1.626 |================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.789 |====================================================================
B . 0.368 |================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.957 |====================================================================
B . 0.726 |====================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 4.187 |====================================================================
B . 1.653 |===========================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 3.820 |====================================================================
B . 2.915 |====================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.094 |====================================================================
B . 0.094 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.906 |====================================================================
B . 0.471 |===================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.375 |====================================================================
B . 0.371 |===================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 3.581 |====================================================================
B . 2.008 |======================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.006 |====================================================================
B . 0.006 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.173 |====================================================================
B . 0.102 |========================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.027 |====================================================================
B . 0.025 |===============================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.546 |====================================================================
B . 0.467 |==========================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.108 |==================================================================
B . 0.112 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
B . 2.057 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.008 |====================================================================
B . 0.008 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.035 |====================================================================
B . 0.035 |====================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State
Seconds < Lower Is Better
A . 0.166 |====================================================================
B . 0.160 |==================================================================
PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0
Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
OpenCV 4.5.4
Test: Features 2D
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 819042 |===================================================================
B . 181988 |===============
OpenCV 4.5.4
Test: Object Detection
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 78811 |====================================================================
B . 77936 |===================================================================
OpenCV 4.5.4
Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network
ms < Lower Is Better
A . 24194 |===================================================================
B . 24491 |====================================================================