7100 Dec

Intel Core i3-7100 testing with a Gigabyte B250M-DS3H-CF (F9 BIOS) and Gigabyte Intel HD 630 KBL GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2112058-TJ-7100DEC7665
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Audio Encoding 2 Tests
Timed Code Compilation 3 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 9 Tests
Compression Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 15 Tests
Creator Workloads 10 Tests
Cryptography 4 Tests
Encoding 4 Tests
Game Development 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 3 Tests
Imaging 2 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests
Machine Learning 2 Tests
Multi-Core 10 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 2 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 4 Tests
Python Tests 4 Tests
Renderers 2 Tests
Server 4 Tests
Server CPU Tests 8 Tests
Single-Threaded 4 Tests
Video Encoding 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
A
December 04 2021
  9 Hours, 12 Minutes
B
December 05 2021
  8 Hours, 14 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  8 Hours, 43 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

7100 Dec Intel Core i3-7100 testing with a Gigabyte B250M-DS3H-CF (F9 BIOS) and Gigabyte Intel HD 630 KBL GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3.90GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte B250M-DS3H-CF (F9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th + B250, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 250GB Western Digital WDS250G1B0A-, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel HD 630 KBL GT2 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-55-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3.90GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte B250M-DS3H-CF (F9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th + B250, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 250GB Western Digital WDS250G1B0A-, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel HD 630 KBL GT2 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-55-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 yquake2 8.0 Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 55.2 |===================================================================== B . 54.6 |==================================================================== yquake2 8.0 Renderer: OpenGL 1.x - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 114.5 |==================================================================== B . 113.9 |==================================================================== yquake2 8.0 Renderer: OpenGL 3.x - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 151.3 |==================================================================== B . 100.6 |============================================= yquake2 8.0 Renderer: Software CPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 96.0 |===================================================================== B . 96.3 |===================================================================== GLmark2 2021.08.30 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Score > Higher Is Better A . 513 |===================================================================== B . 517 |====================================================================== Sockperf 3.7 Test: Throughput Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 415111 |========================================================== B . 479760 |=================================================================== Sockperf 3.7 Test: Latency Ping Pong usec < Lower Is Better A . 3.980 |==================================================================== B . 3.904 |=================================================================== Sockperf 3.7 Test: Latency Under Load usec < Lower Is Better A . 17.28 |========================================================= B . 20.72 |==================================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 560 |====================================================================== B . 355 |============================================ LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 514 |====================================================================== B . 348 |=============================================== BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better A . 5.78 |===================================================================== B . 5.77 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2.48 |===================================================================== B . 2.49 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.86 |===================================================================== B . 0.85 |==================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3.68 |===================================================================== B . 3.67 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better A . 4.16 |===================================================================== B . 4.15 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 685.3 |==================================================================== B . 617.1 |============================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3264.2 |=================================================================== B . 3196.3 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 118.3 |==================================================================== B . 97.5 |======================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3330.3 |=================================================================== B . 3206.0 |================================================================ Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 11.70 |==================================================================== B . 6.45 |===================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2757.7 |=================================================================== B . 2514.9 |============================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 298.3 |==================================================================== B . 193.4 |============================================ Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3401.9 |=================================================================== B . 67.8 |= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 111.5 |==================================================================== B . 46.0 |============================ Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3474.0 |=================================================================== B . 3205.1 |============================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 9.77 |===================================================================== B . 4.59 |================================ Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2867.4 |=================================================================== B . 2546.9 |============================================================ JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 12.05 |==================================================================== B . 4.16 |======================= JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 4.14 |===================================================================== B . 2.00 |================================= JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.6 |====================================================================== B . 0.6 |====================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 51.32 |==================================================================== B . 35.66 |=============================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 51.13 |==================================================================== B . 39.34 |==================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 21.24 |==================================================================== B . 13.10 |========================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 43.94 |==================================================================== B . 35.43 |======================================================= JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 81.02 |==================================================================== B . 61.43 |==================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.03 |===================================================================== B . 0.02 |============================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1.12 |===================================================================== B . 0.38 |======================= AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3.28 |===================================================================== B . 2.78 |========================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2.24 |===================================================================== B . 0.64 |==================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 11.40 |==================================================================== B . 3.19 |=================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 16.45 |==================================================================== B . 3.87 |================ AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 18.52 |==================================================================== B . 15.56 |========================================================= AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.08 |===================================================================== B . 0.03 |========================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3.11 |===================================================================== B . 1.10 |======================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 4.22 |===================================================================== B . 4.21 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.22 |===================================================================== B . 2.76 |========================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 41.16 |==================================================================== B . 36.08 |============================================================ AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 53.62 |==================================================================== B . 46.20 |=========================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 59.03 |==================================================================== B . 50.22 |========================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1.50 |===================================================================== B . 0.92 |========================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 8.49 |===================================================================== B . 8.46 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3.44 |===================================================================== B . 3.17 |================================================================ Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 6.05 |===================================================================== B . 5.26 |============================================================ Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 16.61 |=================================================================== B . 16.79 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 28.53 |==================================================================== B . 28.18 |=================================================================== 7-Zip Compression 21.06 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better A . 15682 |==================================================================== B . 14049 |============================================================= 7-Zip Compression 21.06 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better A . 11819 |==================================================================== B . 10080 |========================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 0.741059 |================================================================= B . 0.739060 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 0.750518 |================================================================= B . 0.750205 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 0.712793 |================================================================= B . 0.710422 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 0.721684 |================================================================= B . 0.723144 |================================================================= Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3067.60 |================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 434.49 |=================================================================== B . 390.94 |============================================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3503.01 |================================================================== B . 3108.63 |=========================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3530.34 |================================================================== B . 3141.29 |=========================================================== Primesieve 7.7 1e12 Prime Number Generation Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 107.04 |=================================================================== B . 106.73 |=================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 18.97 |==================================================================== B . 19.02 |==================================================================== Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 426.35 |=================================================================== B . 419.37 |================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better A . 618.52 |=================================================================== B . 612.02 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 51.01 |=================================================================== B . 52.07 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 59.03 |==================================================================== B . 58.99 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 2018.40 |================================================================== B . 2016.88 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 437.02 |================================================================== B . 441.56 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 72010 |==================================================================== B . 71210 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 507.29 |=================================================================== B . 504.70 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 8838.65 |================================================================== B . 8814.25 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 2867.69 |================================================================== B . 2876.42 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 5431.40 |=============================================================== B . 5652.26 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 10160 |================================================================ B . 10760 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better A . 14340 |==================================================================== B . 14400 |==================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better A . 654906210 |============================================================== B . 680393240 |================================================================ OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 587.6 |=================================================================== B . 598.9 |==================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 38900.7 |================================================================= B . 39356.2 |================================================================== OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 589.5 |=================================================================== B . 599.0 |==================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 38793.3 |================================================================== B . 39051.8 |================================================================== KeyDB 6.2.0 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better A . 126606.53 |=============================================== B . 174230.58 |================================================================ ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 9.0227 |=================================================================== B . 9.0430 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 30.06 |==================================================================== B . 30.05 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 276.18 |=================================================================== B . 275.65 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 9.89 |=================================================================== B . 10.06 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 44.35 |==================================================================== B . 44.16 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 88.23 |================================================================== B . 91.55 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 233274.94 |================================================================ B . 202040.05 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 424.59 |=================================================================== B . 425.14 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 10710276.61 |============================================================== B . 10756201.03 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 5580.24 |================================================================== B . 5529.45 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 17294.51 |================================================================= B . 16923.22 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: IO_uring Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 12475.88 |=============================================================== B . 12896.94 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 26426.88 |================================================================= B . 26498.96 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 258.97 |=================================================================== B . 256.27 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 4253.03 |================================================================== B . 4232.63 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 284316.37 |================================================================ B . 284435.45 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 9537.27 |================================================================== B . 8687.13 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 6864.91 |================================================================== B . 6870.00 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 764.29 |=================================================================== B . 736.89 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 2304.29 |================================================================== B . 2177.33 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 761329.65 |================================================================ B . 759779.58 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 266272.51 |================================================================ B . 265481.49 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 26.8 |===================================================================== B . 26.7 |===================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 1979668.49 |=============================================================== B . 1961038.31 |============================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 776401.25 |================================================================ Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 816003.94 |================================================================ Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: GET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 661598.6 |================================================================= Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: MIX Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 489939.29 |================================================================ Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: SET Blender 3.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 707.60 |=================================================================== B . 693.29 |================================================================== Blender 3.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better B . 1908.64 |================================================================== Blender 3.0 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1990.77 |================================================================== B . 966.63 |================================ Blender 3.0 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2559.64 |================================================================== B . 2524.68 |================================================================= nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 114.30 |=================================================================== B . 77.83 |============================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 73.28 |================================================================== B . 75.80 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.089 |==================================================================== B . 0.061 |=============================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.023 |==================================================================== B . 0.023 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.388 |==================================================================== B . 0.262 |============================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.109 |==================================================================== B . 0.084 |==================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.983 |==================================================================== B . 1.251 |=========================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |==================================================================== B . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.086 |==================================================================== B . 0.086 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.092 |==================================================================== B . 0.091 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.167 |==================================================================== B . 0.167 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.022 |================================================================= B . 0.023 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.720 |==================================================================== B . 0.109 |========== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.066 |==================================================================== B . 0.066 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.468 |==================================================================== B . 0.387 |======================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.264 |==================================================================== B . 0.263 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.737 |==================================================================== B . 1.626 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.789 |==================================================================== B . 0.368 |================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.957 |==================================================================== B . 0.726 |==================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 4.187 |==================================================================== B . 1.653 |=========================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3.820 |==================================================================== B . 2.915 |==================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.094 |==================================================================== B . 0.094 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.906 |==================================================================== B . 0.471 |=================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.375 |==================================================================== B . 0.371 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3.581 |==================================================================== B . 2.008 |====================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.006 |==================================================================== B . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.173 |==================================================================== B . 0.102 |======================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.027 |==================================================================== B . 0.025 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.546 |==================================================================== B . 0.467 |========================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.108 |================================================================== B . 0.112 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better B . 2.057 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.008 |==================================================================== B . 0.008 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.035 |==================================================================== B . 0.035 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.166 |==================================================================== B . 0.160 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better A . 819042 |=================================================================== B . 181988 |=============== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better A . 78811 |==================================================================== B . 77936 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better A . 24194 |=================================================================== B . 24491 |====================================================================