10600K Dec Intel Core i5-10600K testing with a ASUS PRIME Z490M-PLUS (1001 BIOS) and ASUS Intel UHD 630 CML GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: Intel Core i5-10600K @ 4.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z490M-PLUS (1001 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: ASUS Intel UHD 630 CML GT2 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: MX279, Network: Intel OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100rc2daily20210106-generic (x86_64) 20210105, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: Intel Core i5-10600K @ 4.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z490M-PLUS (1001 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: ASUS Intel UHD 630 CML GT2 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: MX279, Network: Intel OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100rc2daily20210106-generic (x86_64) 20210105, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C: Processor: Intel Core i5-10600K @ 4.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z490M-PLUS (1001 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: ASUS Intel UHD 630 CML GT2 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: MX279, Network: Intel OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-051100rc2daily20210106-generic (x86_64) 20210105, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Sockperf 3.7 Test: Throughput Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 705689 |=================================================================== B . 613652 |========================================================== C . 668467 |=============================================================== Sockperf 3.7 Test: Latency Ping Pong usec < Lower Is Better A . 3.283 |================================================================== B . 3.377 |==================================================================== C . 3.282 |================================================================== Sockperf 3.7 Test: Latency Under Load usec < Lower Is Better A . 4.051 |============== B . 19.202 |=================================================================== C . 19.094 |=================================================================== BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better A . 4.92 |===================================================================== B . 4.93 |===================================================================== C . 4.93 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2298.2 |=================================================================== B . 2228.2 |================================================================= C . 2221.0 |================================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 4023.1 |=================================================================== B . 3861.9 |================================================================ C . 4012.8 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 374.0 |==================================================================== B . 369.5 |=================================================================== C . 368.2 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 4127.8 |=================================================================== B . 4125.3 |=================================================================== C . 4128.3 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 36.7 |=================================================================== B . 37.8 |===================================================================== C . 36.7 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3687.0 |================================================================== B . 3747.0 |=================================================================== C . 3759.7 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 449.6 |==================================================================== B . 447.1 |==================================================================== C . 445.1 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 4273.3 |=================================================================== B . 4274.0 |=================================================================== C . 4266.7 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 340.2 |==================================================================== B . 335.4 |=================================================================== C . 341.0 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 4402.9 |=================================================================== B . 4409.5 |=================================================================== C . 4412.4 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 15.0 |===================================================================== B . 15.0 |===================================================================== C . 15.1 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3784.2 |================================================================== B . 3811.5 |=================================================================== C . 3815.0 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 34.85 |==================================================================== B . 34.85 |==================================================================== C . 34.66 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 8.13 |===================================================================== B . 8.12 |===================================================================== C . 8.03 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.86 |===================================================================== B . 0.86 |===================================================================== C . 0.86 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 77.94 |=================================================================== B . 79.13 |==================================================================== C . 77.70 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 76.90 |================================================================== B . 78.80 |==================================================================== C . 77.52 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 28.58 |=================================================================== B . 28.91 |==================================================================== C . 28.91 |==================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 58.93 |=================================================================== B . 59.62 |==================================================================== C . 58.04 |================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 252.31 |================================================================= B . 258.59 |=================================================================== C . 254.33 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 569.88 |================================================================== B . 579.60 |=================================================================== C . 577.36 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better A . 146.41 |================================================================= B . 151.45 |=================================================================== C . 149.89 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 521.61 |================================================================== B . 533.06 |=================================================================== C . 532.01 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better A . 423.14 |================================================================ B . 440.20 |=================================================================== C . 435.62 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.09 |===================================================================== B . 0.09 |===================================================================== C . 0.09 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3.28 |===================================================================== B . 3.29 |===================================================================== C . 3.30 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 8.79 |=================================================================== B . 9.10 |===================================================================== C . 9.01 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 6.78 |===================================================================== B . 6.73 |==================================================================== C . 6.80 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 33.09 |=================================================================== B . 32.56 |================================================================== C . 33.55 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 45.96 |=================================================================== B . 45.08 |================================================================== C . 46.54 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 51.10 |=================================================================== B . 50.15 |================================================================== C . 51.50 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.22 |===================================================================== B . 0.21 |================================================================== C . 0.22 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.71 |===================================================================== B . 7.73 |===================================================================== C . 7.75 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 8.16 |==================================================================== B . 8.33 |===================================================================== C . 8.31 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 20.39 |==================================================================== B . 20.52 |==================================================================== C . 20.46 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 107.36 |=================================================================== B . 107.69 |=================================================================== C . 107.78 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 134.70 |================================================================== B . 134.72 |================================================================== C . 136.16 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 148.97 |=================================================================== B . 148.44 |=================================================================== C . 147.44 |================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 5.25 |===================================================================== B . 5.25 |===================================================================== C . 5.26 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 5.37 |===================================================================== B . 5.35 |===================================================================== C . 5.35 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 25.68 |==================================================================== B . 25.57 |==================================================================== C . 25.63 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 26.51 |==================================================================== B . 26.52 |==================================================================== C . 26.57 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 12.34 |==================================================================== B . 12.41 |==================================================================== C . 12.41 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 22.26 |==================================================================== B . 22.24 |==================================================================== C . 22.27 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 53.84 |==================================================================== B . 53.73 |==================================================================== C . 54.05 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 94.97 |=================================================================== B . 95.26 |==================================================================== C . 95.70 |==================================================================== 7-Zip Compression 21.06 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better A . 52568 |==================================================================== B . 52225 |==================================================================== C . 52501 |==================================================================== 7-Zip Compression 21.06 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better A . 40448 |=================================================================== B . 41038 |==================================================================== C . 40541 |=================================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 2.347228 |================================================================= B . 2.346019 |================================================================= C . 2.353757 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 1.722504 |================================================================= B . 1.723167 |================================================================= C . 1.723116 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 1.184241 |================================================================= B . 1.185378 |================================================================= C . 1.186936 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 2.409880 |================================================================= B . 2.414429 |================================================================= C . 2.411052 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 2.252162 |================================================================= B . 2.253240 |================================================================= C . 2.257741 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 1.770862 |================================================================= B . 1.775685 |================================================================= C . 1.775666 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 1.222975 |================================================================= B . 1.226237 |================================================================= C . 1.226089 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 2.310721 |================================================================= B . 2.312205 |================================================================= C . 2.313155 |================================================================= Primesieve 7.7 1e12 Prime Number Generation Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 32.28 |==================================================================== B . 30.91 |================================================================= C . 30.66 |================================================================= OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 2043.9 |=================================================================== B . 2042.2 |=================================================================== C . 2049.3 |=================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 134213.9 |================================================================= B . 134167.2 |================================================================= C . 134300.1 |================================================================= ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 4.6743 |================================================================== B . 4.7116 |=================================================================== C . 4.7063 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 8.6551 |=================================================================== B . 8.6248 |=================================================================== C . 8.6079 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 79.19 |==================================================================== B . 79.15 |==================================================================== C . 79.13 |==================================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1719132.25 |=============================================================== B . 1702420.12 |============================================================== C . 1697230.12 |============================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1741553.38 |=============================================================== B . 1730109.25 |=============================================================== C . 1732510.12 |=============================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: GET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1463048.74 |=============================================================== B . 614952.84 |========================== C . 589392.87 |========================= Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: MIX Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 841911.61 |================================================================ B . 564887.27 |=========================================== C . 554883.85 |========================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: SET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 546287.75 |================================================================ B . 538268.73 |=============================================================== C . 538518.88 |=============================================================== Blender 3.0 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 199.51 |=================================================================== B . 197.87 |================================================================== C . 197.83 |================================================================== Blender 3.0 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 563.61 |=================================================================== B . 562.05 |=================================================================== C . 562.78 |=================================================================== Blender 3.0 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 276.25 |=================================================================== B . 276.13 |=================================================================== C . 275.83 |=================================================================== Blender 3.0 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2244.24 |================================================================== B . 2232.33 |================================================================== C . 2242.63 |================================================================== Blender 3.0 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 692.69 |=================================================================== B . 689.69 |=================================================================== C . 692.70 |=================================================================== Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 132845.07 |================================================================ B . 133025.53 |================================================================ C . 133498.53 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 123261.02 |================================================================ B . 122662.26 |================================================================ C . 123125.88 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 116327.92 |================================================================ B . 115767.16 |================================================================ C . 116034.85 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 88075.21 |================================================================= B . 87850.70 |================================================================= C . 87924.93 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 82450.09 |================================================================= B . 82183.15 |================================================================= C . 82140.56 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 80436.51 |================================================================= B . 80265.89 |================================================================= C . 80085.82 |================================================================= RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 43.15 |================================================================= B . 44.89 |==================================================================== C . 45.13 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== C . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.014 |=============================================================== B . 0.015 |==================================================================== C . 0.013 |=========================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.038 |================================================================== B . 0.038 |================================================================== C . 0.039 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.009 |==================================================================== B . 0.009 |==================================================================== C . 0.009 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.164 |==================================================================== B . 0.163 |==================================================================== C . 0.161 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.04 |===================================================================== B . 0.04 |===================================================================== C . 0.04 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.785 |=================================================================== B . 0.789 |==================================================================== C . 0.794 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.018 |==================================================================== B . 0.018 |==================================================================== C . 0.018 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== C . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.007 |==================================================================== B . 0.007 |==================================================================== C . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.015 |==================================================================== B . 0.015 |==================================================================== C . 0.015 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.029 |================================================================== B . 0.030 |==================================================================== C . 0.030 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.021 |==================================================================== B . 0.021 |==================================================================== C . 0.021 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.013 |==================================================================== B . 0.013 |==================================================================== C . 0.013 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.069 |==================================================================== B . 0.069 |==================================================================== C . 0.069 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.06 |===================================================================== B . 0.06 |===================================================================== C . 0.06 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.122 |=================================================================== B . 0.121 |================================================================== C . 0.124 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.018 |================================================================ B . 0.018 |================================================================ C . 0.019 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.080 |=================================================================== B . 0.080 |=================================================================== C . 0.081 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.054 |==================================================================== B . 0.053 |=================================================================== C . 0.054 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.31 |===================================================================== B . 0.31 |===================================================================== C . 0.31 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.213 |=================================================================== B . 0.213 |=================================================================== C . 0.215 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.284 |==================================================================== B . 1.292 |==================================================================== C . 1.292 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.260 |=================================================================== B . 0.263 |=================================================================== C . 0.265 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.556 |==================================================================== B . 0.556 |==================================================================== C . 0.556 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.309 |=================================================================== B . 1.312 |=================================================================== C . 1.330 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.324 |==================================================================== B . 2.317 |==================================================================== C . 2.319 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |================================== B . 0.001 |================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.018 |==================================================================== B . 0.018 |==================================================================== C . 0.018 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.076 |==================================================================== B . 0.074 |================================================================== C . 0.074 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.375 |==================================================================== B . 0.375 |==================================================================== C . 0.377 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.295 |=================================================================== B . 0.298 |==================================================================== C . 0.300 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.591 |==================================================================== B . 1.593 |==================================================================== C . 1.596 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.070 |==================================================================== B . 0.070 |==================================================================== C . 0.069 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.020 |============================================================== B . 0.021 |================================================================= C . 0.022 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.354 |=================================================================== B . 0.357 |==================================================================== C . 0.359 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.083 |============================================================ B . 0.094 |==================================================================== C . 0.084 |============================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.614 |================================================================== B . 1.555 |=============================================================== C . 1.668 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.006 |==================================================================== B . 0.006 |==================================================================== C . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.028 |==================================================================== B . 0.028 |==================================================================== C . 0.028 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.126 |================================================================== B . 0.129 |==================================================================== C . 0.129 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better A . 117314 |=================================================================== B . 114485 |================================================================= C . 115475 |================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better A . 44945 |============================================================== B . 48966 |==================================================================== C . 45614 |=============================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better A . 166581 |=================================================================== B . 69251 |============================ C . 67330 |===========================