test-glibc-bench KVM testing on CentOS Linux 8 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x Intel Xeon: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon (Cascadelake) (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX 1996) (1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 8 GB RAM QEMU, Disk: 215GB QEMU HDD, Graphics: Cirrus Logic GD 5446, Network: 2 x Red Hat Virtio device OS: CentOS Linux 8, Kernel: 4.18.0-240.el8.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.5.0 20210514, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: KVM 4 x Intel Xeon: Processor: 4 x Intel Xeon (Cascadelake) (4 Cores), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX 1996) (1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 8 GB RAM QEMU, Disk: 215GB QEMU HDD, Graphics: Cirrus Logic GD 5446, Network: 2 x Red Hat Virtio device OS: CentOS Linux 8, Kernel: 4.18.0-240.el8.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.5.0 20210514, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: KVM glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 68.12 |====================================================== 4 x Intel Xeon . 68.97 |======================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: exp nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 9.28863 |===================================================== 4 x Intel Xeon . 9.24835 |===================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 2.10625 |===================================================== 4 x Intel Xeon . 2.11595 |===================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 66.43 |======================================================= 4 x Intel Xeon . 66.46 |======================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: log2 nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 11.55 |======================================================= 4 x Intel Xeon . 11.51 |======================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: modf nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 2.76147 |===================================================== 4 x Intel Xeon . 2.75701 |===================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 14.72 |======================================================= 4 x Intel Xeon . 14.55 |====================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 2.44363 |===================================================== 4 x Intel Xeon . 2.42045 |==================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 16.80 |====================================================== 4 x Intel Xeon . 17.01 |======================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: asinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 20.00 |======================================================= 4 x Intel Xeon . 19.88 |======================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: atanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 15.65 |======================================================= 4 x Intel Xeon . 15.60 |======================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 2.14093 |===================================================== 4 x Intel Xeon . 2.10349 |==================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sincos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 19.59 |======================================================= 4 x Intel Xeon . 19.51 |======================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon . 2.15410 |===================================================== 4 x Intel Xeon . 2.12911 |====================================================