FT-S2500-core128 Phytium FT-2000+/64 testing with a Byosoft FT2000+ (1.0.30 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Kylin Linux Advanced Server V10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. FT-S2500: Processor: Phytium S2500/64 C00 (128 Cores), Motherboard: ZD-TECH KL4.26.UEFI.S.024.210617.D, Memory: 16 x 16384 MB DDR4-3200MT/s Micron DDR4-, Disk: 240GB SAMSUNG MZ7LH240, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: BenQ GL2055, Network: 4 x Intel I350 OS: Kylin Linux Advanced Server V10, Kernel: 4.19.90-23.4.v2101.ky10.aarch64 (aarch64) 20210303, Desktop: MATE, Display Server: X Server 1.20.6, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 18.3.6 (LLVM 7.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1600x900 FT-2000+/64: Processor: Phytium FT-2000+/64 (64 Cores), Motherboard: Byosoft FT2000+ (1.0.30 BIOS), Memory: 8 x 16 GB DDR4-2666MT/s Micron 9ASF2G72PZ-3G2B1, Disk: 240GB SAMSUNG MZ7LH240, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: BenQ GL2055, Network: 4 x Intel I350 OS: Kylin Linux Advanced Server V10, Kernel: 4.19.90-23.4.v2101.ky10.aarch64 (aarch64) 20210303, Desktop: MATE, Display Server: X Server 1.20.6, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 18.3.6 (LLVM 7.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1600x900 PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better FT-S2500 .... 2435 |================================================ FT-2000+/64 . 3024 |=========================================================== Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA Seconds < Lower Is Better FT-S2500 .... 23.69 |========================================================== FT-2000+/64 . 21.87 |====================================================== CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better FT-S2500 .... 4003.33 |===================================================== FT-2000+/64 . 4194.65 |======================================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better FT-S2500 .... 7829.50 |===================================================== FT-2000+/64 . 8204.19 |======================================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better FT-S2500 .... 15597.47 |==================================================== FT-2000+/64 . 16342.47 |======================================================= John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better FT-S2500 .... 35947 |========================================================== FT-2000+/64 . 27163 |============================================ John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better FT-S2500 .... 937145 |========================================================= FT-2000+/64 . 695018 |========================================== Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better FT-S2500 .... 1411792.06 |===================================================== FT-2000+/64 . 753037.65 |============================ C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better FT-S2500 .... 18.23 |======================================= FT-2000+/64 . 26.80 |========================================================== Sample Pi Program Seconds < Lower Is Better FT-S2500 .... 40.43 |========================================================== FT-2000+/64 . 38.34 |======================================================= OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better FT-S2500 .... 45822799630 |==================================================== FT-2000+/64 . 9419704750 |=========== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better FT-S2500 .... 4202.5 |========================================================= FT-2000+/64 . 2251.8 |=============================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better FT-S2500 .... 293375.6 |======================================================= FT-2000+/64 . 153846.7 |============================= Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: RAM / Memory MiB/sec > Higher Is Better FT-S2500 .... 3316.62 |================== FT-2000+/64 . 10312.76 |======================================================= Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better FT-S2500 .... 275325.19 |====================================================== FT-2000+/64 . 144283.83 |============================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better FT-S2500 .... 167909 |====================================================== FT-2000+/64 . 176478 |=========================================================