5600u 2021 Intel Core i7-5600U testing with a LENOVO 20BSCTO1WW (N14ET49W 1.27 BIOS) and Intel HD 5500 BDW GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 21.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: Intel Core i7-5600U @ 3.20GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO 20BSCTO1WW (N14ET49W 1.27 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Broadwell-U-OPI, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 128GB SAMSUNG MZNTE128, Graphics: Intel HD 5500 BDW GT2 3GB (950MHz), Audio: Intel Broadwell-U Audio, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel 7265 OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-21-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2, Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: Intel Core i7-5600U @ 3.20GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO 20BSCTO1WW (N14ET49W 1.27 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Broadwell-U-OPI, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 128GB SAMSUNG MZNTE128, Graphics: Intel HD 5500 BDW GT2 3GB (950MHz), Audio: Intel Broadwell-U Audio, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel 7265 OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-21-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2, Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C: Processor: Intel Core i7-5600U @ 3.20GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO 20BSCTO1WW (N14ET49W 1.27 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Broadwell-U-OPI, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 128GB SAMSUNG MZNTE128, Graphics: Intel HD 5500 BDW GT2 3GB (950MHz), Audio: Intel Broadwell-U Audio, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel 7265 OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-21-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2, Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 15 |=================================================================== B . 16 |======================================================================= C . 16 |======================================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 8.14 |================================================================== B . 8.47 |===================================================================== C . 8.30 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.026 |==================================================================== B . 0.025 |================================================================= C . 0.025 |================================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 608.2 |================================================================== B . 627.1 |==================================================================== C . 631.3 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 112.7 |==================================================================== B . 108.6 |================================================================== C . 111.7 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.054 |================================================================== B . 0.056 |==================================================================== C . 0.054 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.135 |================================================================== B . 0.140 |==================================================================== C . 0.135 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 7.46 |===================================================================== B . 7.36 |==================================================================== C . 7.20 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.029 |================================================================== B . 0.030 |==================================================================== C . 0.029 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.034 |==================================================================== B . 0.034 |==================================================================== C . 0.033 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.035 |==================================================================== B . 0.034 |================================================================== C . 0.034 |================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 29310.6 |================================================================== B . 28509.1 |================================================================ C . 28569.9 |================================================================ Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 260.1 |==================================================================== B . 253.3 |================================================================== C . 259.2 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.114 |================================================================== B . 0.117 |==================================================================== C . 0.116 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.123 |=================================================================== B . 0.122 |================================================================== C . 0.125 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 111.0 |==================================================================== B . 108.5 |================================================================== C . 111.1 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 29.97 |==================================================================== B . 29.41 |=================================================================== C . 29.31 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 44.34 |=================================================================== B . 45.32 |==================================================================== C . 45.29 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 93 |======================================================================= B . 91 |===================================================================== C . 91 |===================================================================== RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 90.96 |=================================================================== B . 92.67 |==================================================================== C . 92.73 |==================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 439.2 |==================================================================== B . 431.2 |=================================================================== C . 431.1 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.24 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 18.00 |==================================================================== B . 17.70 |=================================================================== C . 17.68 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.449 |=================================================================== B . 0.452 |=================================================================== C . 0.457 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.058 |==================================================================== B . 0.058 |==================================================================== C . 0.057 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.436 |==================================================================== B . 0.434 |==================================================================== C . 0.429 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.582 |==================================================================== B . 0.574 |=================================================================== C . 0.573 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.565 |=================================================================== B . 2.604 |==================================================================== C . 2.605 |==================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 40.77 |==================================================================== B . 40.73 |==================================================================== C . 40.18 |=================================================================== OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 442.5 |=================================================================== B . 446.8 |==================================================================== C . 448.7 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.357 |=================================================================== B . 0.358 |=================================================================== C . 0.362 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 40.01 |==================================================================== B . 39.65 |=================================================================== C . 39.47 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3.07 |===================================================================== B . 3.03 |==================================================================== C . 3.03 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.824 |=================================================================== B . 1.845 |==================================================================== C . 1.822 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.083 |==================================================================== B . 0.082 |=================================================================== C . 0.082 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.345 |==================================================================== B . 0.346 |==================================================================== C . 0.342 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2.640 |==================================================================== B . 2.617 |=================================================================== C . 2.610 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.096 |==================================================================== B . 0.095 |=================================================================== C . 0.095 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 12.43 |=================================================================== B . 12.56 |==================================================================== C . 12.53 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 37.82 |==================================================================== B . 37.65 |==================================================================== C . 37.45 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 11456 |==================================================================== B . 11515 |==================================================================== C . 11410 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.220 |==================================================================== B . 0.220 |==================================================================== C . 0.218 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2184.1 |================================================================== B . 2195.0 |=================================================================== C . 2203.0 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.947 |=================================================================== B . 0.955 |==================================================================== C . 0.947 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.845 |==================================================================== B . 0.838 |=================================================================== C . 0.838 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.247 |=================================================================== B . 0.249 |==================================================================== C . 0.247 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.131 |=================================================================== B . 0.132 |==================================================================== C . 0.132 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.135 |==================================================================== B . 0.134 |=================================================================== C . 0.134 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.578 |==================================================================== B . 1.585 |==================================================================== C . 1.574 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1.45 |===================================================================== B . 1.44 |===================================================================== C . 1.44 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.441 |==================================================================== B . 2.453 |==================================================================== C . 2.437 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 16.26 |==================================================================== B . 16.34 |==================================================================== C . 16.36 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.515 |==================================================================== B . 0.516 |==================================================================== C . 0.518 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 14.22 |==================================================================== B . 14.17 |==================================================================== C . 14.25 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.614 |==================================================================== B . 0.615 |==================================================================== C . 0.612 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 8.26 |===================================================================== B . 8.23 |===================================================================== C . 8.22 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2.33 |===================================================================== B . 2.32 |===================================================================== C . 2.32 |===================================================================== GIMP 2.10.24 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 19.24 |==================================================================== B . 19.17 |==================================================================== C . 19.16 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.24 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 16.81 |==================================================================== B . 16.77 |==================================================================== C . 16.74 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.480 |==================================================================== B . 2.483 |==================================================================== C . 2.490 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2445.2 |=================================================================== B . 2455.0 |=================================================================== C . 2454.1 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2523.3 |=================================================================== B . 2532.0 |=================================================================== C . 2531.2 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 3.849 |==================================================================== B . 3.850 |==================================================================== C . 3.837 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.616 |==================================================================== B . 0.618 |==================================================================== C . 0.616 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 44.37 |==================================================================== B . 44.24 |==================================================================== C . 44.28 |==================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 34.16 |==================================================================== B . 34.17 |==================================================================== C . 34.07 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.24 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 22.17 |==================================================================== B . 22.14 |==================================================================== C . 22.11 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.3797 |=================================================================== B . 6.3961 |=================================================================== C . 6.3901 |=================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 27518.4 |================================================================== B . 27587.6 |================================================================== C . 27582.3 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2690.7 |=================================================================== B . 2697.3 |=================================================================== C . 2696.9 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 425.14 |=================================================================== B . 426.14 |=================================================================== C . 425.94 |=================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better A . 468102670 |================================================================ B . 467779183 |================================================================ C . 467121283 |================================================================ BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better A . 5.12 |===================================================================== B . 5.13 |===================================================================== C . 5.12 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2616.3 |=================================================================== B . 2614.2 |=================================================================== C . 2612.0 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2262.7 |=================================================================== B . 2263.3 |=================================================================== C . 2263.7 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.013 |==================================================================== B . 0.013 |==================================================================== C . 0.013 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.033 |==================================================================== B . 0.033 |==================================================================== C . 0.033 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== C . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.09 |===================================================================== B . 0.09 |===================================================================== C . 0.09 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.028 |==================================================================== B . 0.028 |==================================================================== C . 0.028 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.022 |==================================================================== B . 0.022 |==================================================================== C . 0.022 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.008 |==================================================================== B . 0.008 |==================================================================== C . 0.008 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.008 |==================================================================== B . 0.008 |==================================================================== C . 0.008 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.014 |==================================================================== B . 0.014 |==================================================================== C . 0.014 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.007 |==================================================================== B . 0.007 |==================================================================== C . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.025 |==================================================================== B . 0.025 |==================================================================== C . 0.025 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.006 |==================================================================== B . 0.006 |==================================================================== C . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.006 |==================================================================== B . 0.006 |==================================================================== C . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.007 |==================================================================== B . 0.007 |==================================================================== C . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 4.62 |===================================================================== B . 4.62 |===================================================================== C . 4.62 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.50 |===================================================================== B . 0.50 |===================================================================== C . 0.50 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 3.16 |===================================================================== B . 3.16 |===================================================================== C . 3.16 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |============================================= B . 0.006 |==================================================================== C . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.189 |==================================================================== B . 0.182 |================================================================= C . 0.185 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.050 |==================================================================== B . 0.045 |============================================================= C . 0.044 |============================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.010 |==================================================================== B . 0.010 |==================================================================== C . 0.010 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.009 |==================================================================== B . 0.009 |==================================================================== C . 0.009 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 910 |====================================================================== B . 861 |================================================================== C . 897 |===================================================================== Sockperf 3.7 Test: Latency Under Load usec < Lower Is Better A . 17.33 |==================================================================== B . 13.21 |==================================================== C . 13.74 |====================================================== Sockperf 3.7 Test: Latency Ping Pong usec < Lower Is Better A . 12.188 |=================================================================== B . 9.708 |===================================================== C . 8.876 |================================================= Sockperf 3.7 Test: Throughput Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 350505 |=================================================================== B . 322628 |============================================================== C . 316802 |=============================================================