3960X November AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core testing with a MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59) v1.0 (1.12N1 BIOS) and Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 5500/5500M / Pro 5500M 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core @ 3.80GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59) v1.0 (1.12N1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1TB, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 5500/5500M / Pro 5500M 8GB (1900/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.12.0-051200rc2daily20210307-generic (x86_64) 20210306, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core @ 3.80GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59) v1.0 (1.12N1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1TB, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 5500/5500M / Pro 5500M 8GB (1900/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.12.0-051200rc2daily20210307-generic (x86_64) 20210306, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core @ 3.80GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59) v1.0 (1.12N1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1TB, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 5500/5500M / Pro 5500M 8GB (1900/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.12.0-051200rc2daily20210307-generic (x86_64) 20210306, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 D: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core @ 3.80GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Creator TRX40 (MS-7C59) v1.0 (1.12N1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1TB, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 5500/5500M / Pro 5500M 8GB (1900/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.12.0-051200rc2daily20210307-generic (x86_64) 20210306, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 56302.06 |================================================================= B . 55889.82 |================================================================= C . 54982.94 |=============================================================== D . 53569.35 |============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 10495.15 |================================================================= B . 10444.20 |================================================================= C . 10389.22 |================================================================ D . 10076.31 |============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 2241.75 |================================================================== B . 2236.07 |================================================================== C . 2242.84 |================================================================== D . 2212.08 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 2235.06 |================================================================== B . 2234.73 |================================================================== C . 2234.41 |================================================================== D . 2123.22 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 25321.59 |================================================================= B . 25361.16 |================================================================= C . 25143.18 |================================================================ D . 25004.19 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 1256.14 |================================================================== B . 909.78 |================================================ C . 1021.96 |====================================================== D . 877.85 |============================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 48929.01 |================================================================= B . 49283.99 |================================================================= C . 49129.77 |================================================================= D . 48615.48 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 24810.62 |================================================================ B . 25185.12 |================================================================= C . 25166.06 |================================================================= D . 24871.52 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 24033.54 |================================================================ B . 24399.27 |================================================================= C . 24239.71 |================================================================= D . 24004.13 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 16319.87 |=============================================================== B . 16757.24 |================================================================= C . 16767.41 |================================================================= D . 15954.25 |============================================================== BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better A . 8.57 |===================================================================== B . 8.52 |===================================================================== C . 8.57 |===================================================================== D . 8.48 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 6198.3 |================================================================= B . 6298.0 |================================================================== C . 6261.8 |================================================================== D . 6362.7 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 1390.9 |======================================================== B . 1677.6 |=================================================================== C . 1586.3 |=============================================================== D . 1516.8 |============================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3719.4 |=================================================================== B . 3666.9 |================================================================== C . 3690.0 |================================================================== D . 3703.8 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 64.8 |=============================================================== B . 71.5 |===================================================================== C . 62.0 |============================================================ D . 62.9 |============================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3467.8 |=================================================================== B . 3400.9 |================================================================== C . 3394.7 |================================================================== D . 3396.9 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 333.2 |================================================================== B . 336.0 |=================================================================== C . 338.7 |=================================================================== D . 342.3 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3821.4 |================================================================== B . 3830.0 |================================================================== C . 3901.3 |=================================================================== D . 3888.5 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 393.6 |==================================================================== B . 388.6 |=================================================================== C . 389.3 |=================================================================== D . 387.4 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 4027.4 |=================================================================== B . 4000.1 |================================================================== C . 3973.3 |================================================================== D . 4039.8 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 13.3 |===================================================================== B . 13.2 |==================================================================== C . 13.2 |==================================================================== D . 13.1 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3479.3 |================================================================== B . 3519.6 |=================================================================== C . 3490.8 |================================================================== D . 3481.4 |================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 70.08 |=================================================================== B . 71.31 |==================================================================== C . 71.41 |==================================================================== D . 69.53 |================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 11.84 |=================================================================== B . 12.10 |==================================================================== C . 11.99 |=================================================================== D . 11.91 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.90 |===================================================================== B . 0.89 |==================================================================== C . 0.89 |==================================================================== D . 0.89 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 90.51 |================================================================= B . 95.26 |==================================================================== C . 94.88 |==================================================================== D . 94.32 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 90.63 |================================================================= B . 95.04 |==================================================================== C . 95.12 |==================================================================== D . 94.17 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 32.14 |================================================================== B . 32.92 |==================================================================== C . 32.94 |==================================================================== D . 32.65 |=================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 55.22 |================================================================== B . 56.80 |==================================================================== C . 56.85 |==================================================================== D . 56.72 |==================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 226.16 |================================================================= B . 234.18 |=================================================================== C . 233.57 |=================================================================== D . 231.21 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 864.97 |=================================================================== B . 857.65 |================================================================== C . 867.02 |=================================================================== D . 851.19 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better A . 375.75 |================================================================== B . 383.46 |=================================================================== C . 379.13 |================================================================== D . 378.36 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 947.51 |=================================================================== B . 931.80 |================================================================== C . 933.56 |================================================================== D . 940.67 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better A . 668.41 |=================================================================== B . 670.76 |=================================================================== C . 664.45 |================================================================== D . 664.95 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.19 |===================================================================== B . 0.19 |===================================================================== C . 0.19 |===================================================================== D . 0.19 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 5.67 |===================================================================== B . 5.65 |===================================================================== C . 5.66 |===================================================================== D . 5.57 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 11.81 |==================================================================== B . 11.89 |==================================================================== C . 11.33 |================================================================= D . 11.12 |================================================================ AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 11.16 |==================================================================== B . 11.20 |==================================================================== C . 11.12 |==================================================================== D . 11.00 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 38.04 |==================================================================== B . 38.16 |==================================================================== C . 38.20 |==================================================================== D . 38.22 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 44.14 |=================================================================== B . 44.59 |=================================================================== C . 44.97 |==================================================================== D . 44.69 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 47.37 |=================================================================== B . 48.08 |==================================================================== C . 46.68 |================================================================== D . 47.39 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.39 |===================================================================== B . 0.39 |===================================================================== C . 0.39 |===================================================================== D . 0.38 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 9.97 |===================================================================== B . 9.93 |===================================================================== C . 9.94 |===================================================================== D . 9.85 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.78 |==================================================================== B . 7.90 |===================================================================== C . 7.84 |==================================================================== D . 7.80 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 25.61 |================================================================== B . 26.12 |=================================================================== C . 26.35 |==================================================================== D . 25.44 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 100.09 |================================================================== B . 102.26 |=================================================================== C . 98.86 |================================================================= D . 96.64 |=============================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 119.53 |=================================================================== B . 118.07 |================================================================== C . 117.13 |================================================================== D . 116.42 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 126.31 |=================================================================== B . 121.83 |================================================================= C . 124.76 |================================================================== D . 125.60 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 52.52 |==================================================================== B . 52.37 |=================================================================== C . 52.83 |==================================================================== D . 50.71 |================================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 195.04 |================================================================== B . 199.36 |=================================================================== C . 196.69 |================================================================== D . 198.73 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.493 |==================================================================== B . 0.493 |==================================================================== C . 0.484 |=================================================================== D . 0.489 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2.638 |==================================================================== B . 2.630 |==================================================================== C . 2.597 |=================================================================== D . 2.588 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3.602 |==================================================================== B . 3.573 |=================================================================== C . 3.584 |==================================================================== D . 3.517 |================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 9.498 |==================================================================== B . 9.514 |==================================================================== C . 9.400 |=================================================================== D . 9.098 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 5.571484 |================================================================ B . 5.693091 |================================================================= C . 5.669909 |================================================================= D . 5.585434 |================================================================ Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 4.113746 |================================================================= B . 4.114560 |================================================================= C . 4.052482 |================================================================ D . 3.871015 |============================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 2.764206 |================================================================= B . 2.734812 |================================================================ C . 2.761955 |================================================================= D . 2.673990 |=============================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 5.920950 |================================================================= B . 5.925287 |================================================================= C . 5.899486 |================================================================= D . 5.748593 |=============================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 5.492024 |================================================================= B . 5.497541 |================================================================= C . 5.457375 |================================================================= D . 5.325265 |=============================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 4.415353 |================================================================= B . 4.402661 |================================================================= C . 4.432329 |================================================================= D . 4.318334 |=============================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 3.025208 |================================================================= B . 3.021768 |================================================================= C . 3.013337 |================================================================= D . 2.973298 |================================================================ Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 5.761934 |================================================================= B . 5.740173 |================================================================= C . 5.732118 |================================================================= D . 5.578858 |=============================================================== OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 7177.6 |=================================================================== B . 7188.9 |=================================================================== C . 7183.0 |=================================================================== D . 7148.9 |=================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 462360.5 |================================================================= B . 462673.8 |================================================================= C . 462627.3 |================================================================= D . 460891.5 |================================================================= ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 4.1203 |================================================================== B . 4.1409 |=================================================================== C . 4.1329 |=================================================================== D . 4.1548 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.3740 |================================================================== B . 7.4625 |=================================================================== C . 7.4391 |=================================================================== D . 7.4908 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 27.35 |==================================================================== B . 27.35 |==================================================================== C . 27.37 |==================================================================== D . 27.52 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.690 |================================================================ B . 8.140 |==================================================================== C . 8.025 |=================================================================== D . 8.059 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.21 |==================================================================== B . 11.19 |==================================================================== C . 11.21 |==================================================================== D . 11.18 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 13.20 |==================================================================== B . 13.09 |=================================================================== C . 13.13 |=================================================================== D . 13.27 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 16.60 |=================================================================== B . 16.61 |=================================================================== C . 16.55 |=================================================================== D . 16.88 |==================================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1199040.75 |============================================================== B . 1215509.88 |============================================================== C . 1217433.62 |=============================================================== D . 1226391.88 |=============================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1213886.88 |============================================================ B . 1207146.25 |============================================================ C . 1272426.50 |=============================================================== D . 1173708.88 |========================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: GET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1019005.44 |=============================================================== B . 438619.92 |=========================== C . 444330.24 |=========================== D . 443630.40 |=========================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: MIX Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 652201.12 |================================================================ B . 418014.40 |========================================= C . 423185.56 |========================================== D . 430943.92 |========================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: SET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 393440.43 |================================================================ B . 388115.05 |=============================================================== C . 385503.33 |=============================================================== D . 389826.53 |=============================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 55.01 |=================================================================== B . 55.65 |==================================================================== C . 54.79 |=================================================================== D . 55.07 |=================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 155.25 |=================================================================== B . 155.92 |=================================================================== C . 155.99 |=================================================================== D . 155.80 |=================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 73.47 |=================================================================== B . 73.87 |==================================================================== C . 73.27 |=================================================================== D . 74.11 |==================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 229.67 |================================================================== B . 231.74 |=================================================================== C . 230.64 |================================================================== D . 232.46 |=================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 175.33 |=================================================================== B . 175.34 |=================================================================== C . 174.69 |=================================================================== D . 175.56 |=================================================================== Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 149304.91 |================================================================ B . 148943.40 |================================================================ C . 148759.28 |================================================================ D . 148623.47 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 144517.56 |================================================================ B . 143758.72 |================================================================ C . 143708.88 |================================================================ D . 142582.89 |=============================================================== Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 138923.66 |================================================================ B . 138489.69 |================================================================ C . 138269.38 |================================================================ D . 137715.41 |=============================================================== Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 123092.43 |================================================================ B . 122450.37 |================================================================ C . 122787.43 |================================================================ D . 122312.29 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 117535.35 |================================================================ B . 117114.65 |================================================================ C . 116981.51 |================================================================ D . 117563.11 |================================================================ Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 117224.84 |================================================================ B . 117532.15 |================================================================ C . 118142.03 |================================================================ D . 117234.49 |================================================================ RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 68.15 |================================================================== B . 69.79 |=================================================================== C . 70.05 |==================================================================== D . 70.45 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== C . 0.003 |==================================================================== D . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== D . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.017 |================================================================ B . 0.017 |================================================================ C . 0.017 |================================================================ D . 0.018 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== D . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.057 |================================================================ B . 0.058 |================================================================= C . 0.061 |==================================================================== D . 0.056 |============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.010 |============================================================== B . 0.011 |==================================================================== C . 0.011 |==================================================================== D . 0.010 |============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.143 |================================================================ B . 0.149 |=================================================================== C . 0.149 |=================================================================== D . 0.151 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.041 |================================================================== B . 0.042 |==================================================================== C . 0.042 |==================================================================== D . 0.041 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.597 |================================================================= B . 0.626 |==================================================================== C . 0.622 |==================================================================== D . 0.619 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== D . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== D . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== D . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |==================================================================== B . 0.016 |==================================================================== C . 0.016 |==================================================================== D . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== D . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.007 |==================================================================== B . 0.007 |==================================================================== C . 0.007 |==================================================================== D . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.013 |==================================================================== B . 0.013 |==================================================================== C . 0.013 |==================================================================== D . 0.013 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.029 |==================================================================== B . 0.029 |==================================================================== C . 0.028 |================================================================== D . 0.029 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== D . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== D . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== D . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.02 |===================================================================== B . 0.02 |===================================================================== C . 0.02 |===================================================================== D . 0.02 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.015 |==================================================================== B . 0.015 |==================================================================== C . 0.015 |==================================================================== D . 0.015 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.060 |=================================================================== B . 0.061 |==================================================================== C . 0.061 |==================================================================== D . 0.061 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.053 |=================================================================== B . 0.053 |=================================================================== C . 0.053 |=================================================================== D . 0.054 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.119 |=================================================================== B . 0.121 |==================================================================== C . 0.119 |=================================================================== D . 0.120 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.018 |==================================================================== B . 0.018 |==================================================================== C . 0.018 |==================================================================== D . 0.018 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.072 |=================================================================== B . 0.073 |==================================================================== C . 0.072 |=================================================================== D . 0.072 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.061 |==================================================================== B . 0.061 |==================================================================== C . 0.061 |==================================================================== D . 0.061 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.275 |================================================================== B . 0.281 |==================================================================== C . 0.281 |==================================================================== D . 0.283 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.243 |==================================================================== B . 0.238 |=================================================================== C . 0.243 |==================================================================== D . 0.243 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.169 |=================================================================== B . 1.171 |=================================================================== C . 1.181 |==================================================================== D . 1.171 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.242 |================================================================== B . 0.247 |==================================================================== C . 0.243 |=================================================================== D . 0.248 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.561 |=================================================================== B . 0.573 |==================================================================== C . 0.561 |=================================================================== D . 0.571 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.260 |=================================================================== B . 1.276 |==================================================================== C . 1.257 |=================================================================== D . 1.276 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.354 |==================================================================== B . 2.367 |==================================================================== C . 2.335 |=================================================================== D . 2.365 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== D . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== D . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |==================================================================== B . 0.016 |==================================================================== C . 0.016 |==================================================================== D . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.073 |=================================================================== B . 0.074 |==================================================================== C . 0.072 |================================================================== D . 0.074 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.345 |==================================================================== B . 0.341 |=================================================================== C . 0.345 |==================================================================== D . 0.347 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.291 |==================================================================== B . 0.290 |==================================================================== C . 0.291 |==================================================================== D . 0.292 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.424 |=================================================================== B . 1.434 |==================================================================== C . 1.436 |==================================================================== D . 1.432 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |========================================================= B . 0.005 |========================================================= C . 0.006 |==================================================================== D . 0.005 |========================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.066 |=================================================================== B . 0.067 |==================================================================== C . 0.067 |==================================================================== D . 0.067 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.021 |==================================================================== B . 0.021 |==================================================================== C . 0.020 |================================================================= D . 0.020 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.345 |=================================================================== B . 0.349 |=================================================================== C . 0.348 |=================================================================== D . 0.352 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.087 |================================================================ B . 0.093 |==================================================================== C . 0.089 |================================================================= D . 0.087 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.482 |================================================================= B . 1.539 |==================================================================== C . 1.543 |==================================================================== D . 1.512 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== D . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== D . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.006 |========================================================== B . 0.007 |==================================================================== C . 0.006 |========================================================== D . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.031 |==================================================================== B . 0.030 |================================================================== C . 0.031 |==================================================================== D . 0.031 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.123 |================================================================= B . 0.127 |=================================================================== C . 0.126 |================================================================== D . 0.129 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better A . 127689 |=================================================================== B . 108603 |========================================================= C . 109329 |========================================================= D . 125434 |================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better A . 67095 |=============================================================== B . 68086 |================================================================ C . 61892 |========================================================== D . 72761 |==================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better A . 7716 |=========================================== B . 8493 |================================================ C . 8649 |================================================= D . 12103 |====================================================================