5540W10NOAV16112021Tests Intel Core i7-9850H testing with a Dell 0WWHJ2 (1.3.3 BIOS) and Intel UHD 630 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 + Microsoft Remote Display 4GB on Microsoft Windows 10 Enterprise Build 19042 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S: Processor: Intel Core i7-9850H @ 2.59GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0WWHJ2 (1.3.3 BIOS), Memory: 1 x 16384 MB 2667MHz HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK, Disk: 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S 512GB, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 + Microsoft Remote Display 4GB, Audio: HD Audio Device + Intel Display Audio, Network: Intel Wireless-AC 9260 160MHz OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Enterprise Build 19042, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 462.31 (27.20.100.9664), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 0.22291725 |========================================= Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 66.43 |============================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 0.02525871 |========================================= LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 9.13 |=============================================== CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 8585.53 |============================================ PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 440746 |============================================= 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 29904 |============================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 2588.57 |============================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 1312 |=============================================== Basis Universal 1.13 Settings: ETC1S Seconds < Lower Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 28.83 |============================================== Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like MB/s > Higher Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 16525.2 |============================================ Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 16883.4 |============================================ Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 17068.7 |============================================ Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes MB/s > Higher Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 16741.0 |============================================ Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads MB/s > Higher Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 17589.7 |============================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 662.23 |============================================= Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 26.56 |============================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 21.76 |============================================== WinSAT Test: Disk MB/s > Higher Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 100.63 |============================================= OpenSSL 1.0.1g RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better 477GB NVMe Micron 2200S . 186.1 |============================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better