single-core AMD Ryzen 5 5600G testing with a ASUS ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING II (4301 BIOS) and ASUS AMD Cezanne on Debian GNU/Linux 11 via the Phoronix Test Suite. AMD: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 5600G @ 3.90GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING II (4301 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Renoir Root Complex, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 860 + 5 x 12000GB Western Digital WD120EMFZ-11, Graphics: ASUS AMD Cezanne (1900/400MHz), Audio: AMD Device 1637, Network: Intel I211 OS: Debian GNU/Linux 11, Kernel: 5.11.22-5-pve (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 10.2.1 20210110, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Covariance Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 2.343 |================================================================== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Correlation Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 2.395 |================================================================== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 2.695 |================================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: air Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mdbx Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: doduc Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: tfft2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: aermod Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: rnflow Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: induct2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: capacita Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: channel2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: fatigue2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: gas_dyn2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: test_fpu2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mp_prop_design Seconds < Lower Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 37 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 144 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 540 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 1852 |=================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 51 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 1771 |=================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 70 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 540 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 467 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 664 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 170 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 732 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 266 |==================================================================== BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better AMD . 5.48 |=================================================================== GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better AMD . 6005.1 |================================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 3284.31 |================================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 1657.13 |================================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 2360.32 |================================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 2784.67 |================================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 7587.11 |================================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 2032.31 |================================================================ Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 7.833 |================================================================== Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better AMD . 11007.0 |================================================================ BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better AMD . 46921254.1 |============================================================= CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 3316.39 |================================================================ CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 30889.17 |=============================================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 60781.04 |=============================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 1452.93 |================================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 529.41 |================================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 292.79 |================================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 1394.56 |================================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 3004.01 |================================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 2043.87 |================================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 693.94 |================================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 164.93 |================================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 284.05 |================================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 733.18 |================================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 1093.03 |================================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better AMD . 1194.50 |================================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 98.64 |================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 94.42 |================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 6228.59 |================================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 6208.24 |================================================================ Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 408.58 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 403.35 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 522.26 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 518.25 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 160.99 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 160.34 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 MiB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 765.44 |================================================================= Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better AMD . 753.90 |================================================================= Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD . 5423 |=================================================================== Swet 1.5.16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Node.js Octane Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better AMD . 52259 |================================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better AMD . 408.65 |================================================================= Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 32.91 |================================================================== dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 38.42 |================================================================== DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 68.26 |================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 18.06 |================================================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 6.320 |================================================================== Ogg Audio Encoding 1.3.4 Seconds < Lower Is Better eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 41.83 |================================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 54.91 |================================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 78.43 |================================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 97.99 |================================================================== OpenCV Benchmark 3.3.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 0.10681174 |============================================================= Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 0.00135881 |============================================================= Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 517.12 |================================================================= R Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 10.43 |================================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 38.15 |================================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: exp nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 5.13623 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 2.29951 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 37.86 |================================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: log2 nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 4.87896 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: modf nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 2.58858 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 7.33975 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 2.57934 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 9.12515 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: asinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 6.68187 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: atanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 8.45545 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 2.27339 |================================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sincos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 10.75 |================================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 2.25012 |================================================================ Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better AMD . 82.35 |================================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better AMD . 99.30 |================================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better AMD . 99.20 |================================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads ns < Lower Is Better AMD . 99.01 |================================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads ns < Lower Is Better AMD . 95.07 |================================================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better AMD . 241.90 |================================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 39.76 |================================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 42.28 |================================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 244.24 |================================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Random Numbers Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 718.15 |================================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Vector Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 46.87 |================================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Function Objects Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 12.55 |================================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Abstraction Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 20.85 |================================================================== Inkscape Operation: SVG Files To PNG Seconds < Lower Is Better BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Shared ns < Lower Is Better AMD . 17.3 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock ns < Lower Is Better AMD . 20.6 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better AMD . 13.7 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better AMD . 15.9 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquire ns < Lower Is Better AMD . 9.03 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amd ns < Lower Is Better AMD . 22.7 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutex ns < Lower Is Better AMD . 9.98 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlock ns < Lower Is Better AMD . 9.00 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD . 3523219.0 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD . 2855826.08 |============================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD . 2100702.63 |============================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD . 3353038.75 |============================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD . 2527768.46 |============================================================= Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark FPS > Higher Is Better AMD . 147.84 |================================================================= PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 767 |==================================================================== Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT QUIPs > Higher Is Better AMD . 478973698.44 |=========================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD . 88250.52 |=============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD . 488867.64 |============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD . 474146.64 |============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD . 463770.71 |============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD . 453661.42 |============================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD . 438264.27 |============================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better AMD . 806564 |================================================================= Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD . 49.36 |================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 Seconds < Lower Is Better