programmer-G5 Intel Core i9-10850K (6C/12T) testing with a Dell G5 (model 5000, 1.4.0 BIOS) and Dell GeForce GTX 1660 Super 6 GB on Ubuntu 21.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Core i5-10400F: Processor: Intel Core i5-10400F @ 4.30GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0M6C7G (1.4.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: SK hynix BC511 NVMe 512GB + 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 + 500GB Western Digital WDS500G2B0A + 2000GB Seagate ST2000LM007-1R81, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB, Audio: Realtek ALC3861, Monitor: VX2257, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Intel Comet Lake PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-21-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13, Display Driver: NVIDIA 470.82.00, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.4.153, Vulkan: 1.2.175, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0 + Clang 13.0.0-2 + CUDA 11.3, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Core i9-10850K 6C/12T: Processor: Intel Core i9-10850K @ 5.20GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0M6C7G (1.4.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: SK hynix BC511 NVMe 512GB + 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR1 + 500GB Western Digital WDS500G2B0A + 2000GB Seagate ST2000LM007-1R81, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB, Audio: Realtek ALC3861, Monitor: VX2257, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Intel Comet Lake PCH CNVi WiFi OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.13.0-21-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13, Display Driver: NVIDIA 470.82.00, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.4.153, Vulkan: 1.2.175, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0 + Clang 13.0.0-2 + CUDA 11.3, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C-Blosc 2.0 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 12787.4 |================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 17702.7 |============================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 103.05 |=================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 138.44 |=============================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 201623167 |=========================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 206613767 |============================================ simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 2.72 |=========================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 3.13 |================================================= simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 0.95 |========================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 1.10 |================================================= simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 4.21 |=========================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 4.76 |================================================= simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 4.65 |========================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 5.48 |================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 1851.0 |================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 2753.6 |=============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 177.3 |========================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 321.5 |================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 3728.3 |========================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 4200.8 |=============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 26.6 |========================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 30.7 |================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 3253.3 |========================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 3648.9 |=============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 1098.3 |======================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 1282.0 |=============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 3854.2 |========================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 4362.1 |=============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 190.1 |====================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 417.9 |================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 3972.1 |========================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 4444.5 |=============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 21.6 |========================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 25.5 |================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 3288.3 |========================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 3693.9 |=============================================== ArrayFire 3.7 Test: BLAS CPU GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 616.27 |======================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 729.16 |=============================================== ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 2.127922 |================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 3.017580 |============================================= Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 22.74 |================================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 19.12 |======================================== Timed Clash Compilation Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 2.764 |================================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 2.366 |========================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 78.48 |================================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 66.41 |========================================= Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 1260.64 |============================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 1073.26 |======================================= Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 78.41 |================================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 67.05 |========================================= Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 186.58 |=============================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 159.80 |======================================== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 37.84 |================================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 31.65 |======================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 128.83 |=============================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 109.59 |======================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 1011.04 |============================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 858.81 |======================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 1054.24 |============================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 880.05 |====================================== Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 70.82 |================================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 59.95 |========================================= Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 51.17 |================================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 43.16 |======================================== Timed Node.js Compilation 15.11 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 658.80 |=============================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 549.87 |======================================= Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 71.31 |================================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 60.79 |========================================= Build2 0.13 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 196.61 |=============================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 166.55 |======================================== Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 69.69 |================================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 60.70 |========================================== Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 23.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 128.41 |=============================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 109.15 |======================================== Timed Wasmer Compilation 1.0.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 81.56 |================================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 68.04 |======================================== Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 11.52 |================================================ Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 1713371 |======================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 2020518 |============================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 729530 |======================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 859563 |=============================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 3855.0 |========================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 4459.1 |=============================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 3842.7 |======================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 4476.9 |=============================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 717.5 |========================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 841.2 |================================================ Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 724.6 |========================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 849.1 |================================================ Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 415.9 |========================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 488.6 |================================================ Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 419.0 |========================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 491.7 |================================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 3101.1 |======================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 3617.6 |=============================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 3091.2 |======================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 3627.8 |=============================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 717.3 |========================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 842.7 |================================================ Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 721.2 |========================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 847.2 |================================================ Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 415.6 |========================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 489.9 |================================================ Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 415.2 |========================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 491.7 |================================================ SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 57.32 |================================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 48.79 |========================================= PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 948 |================================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 813 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 231 |================================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 198 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 305 |================================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 262 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 97.2 |================================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 83.4 |========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 106.0 |================================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 88.2 |======================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 118 |================================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 101 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 16.1 |================================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 14.2 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 422 |================================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 362 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 22.2 |================================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 19.0 |========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 96.5 |================================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 82.7 |========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 160 |================================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 140 |============================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 7.72 |================================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 6.52 |========================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 45.5 |================================================= Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 39.8 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 402 |================================================== Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 341 |========================================== Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5-10400F ........ 47.95 |================================================ Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 41.30 |========================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9-10850K 6C/12T . 4101.0 |===============================================