3970X nov AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core testing with a ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1201 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 8GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 4.55GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1201 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc6-phx (x86_64) 20210203, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 B: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 4.55GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1201 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc6-phx (x86_64) 20210203, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 C: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 4.55GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1201 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc6-phx (x86_64) 20210203, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 D: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 4.55GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (1201 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 8GB (1750/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc6-phx (x86_64) 20210203, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 753.32 |=================================================================== B . 751.01 |=================================================================== C . 749.72 |=================================================================== D . 753.09 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better A . 361.20 |================================================================= B . 368.29 |=================================================================== C . 369.85 |=================================================================== D . 361.77 |================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 709.09 |=================================================================== B . 704.77 |=================================================================== C . 703.45 |================================================================== D . 704.56 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better A . 584.23 |=================================================================== B . 580.36 |=================================================================== C . 582.30 |=================================================================== D . 580.44 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 82.57 |==================================================================== B . 81.09 |=================================================================== C . 80.45 |================================================================== D . 80.05 |================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 10.22 |==================================================================== B . 10.04 |=================================================================== C . 9.89 |================================================================== D . 10.01 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.88 |=================================================================== B . 0.90 |===================================================================== C . 0.90 |===================================================================== D . 0.89 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 92.71 |==================================================================== B . 89.38 |================================================================== C . 88.52 |================================================================= D . 87.63 |================================================================ JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 92.52 |==================================================================== B . 89.44 |================================================================== C . 88.95 |================================================================= D . 87.23 |================================================================ JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 30.93 |==================================================================== B . 30.64 |=================================================================== C . 30.68 |=================================================================== D . 30.31 |=================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 57.10 |==================================================================== B . 55.85 |=================================================================== C . 55.17 |================================================================== D . 55.19 |================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 280.03 |=================================================================== B . 273.03 |================================================================= C . 265.98 |================================================================ D . 264.14 |=============================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: GET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 799815.35 |================================================================ B . 454153.84 |==================================== C . 446761.56 |==================================== D . 440793.30 |=================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: MIX Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 571592.89 |================================================================ B . 419897.86 |=============================================== C . 423297.56 |=============================================== D . 423876.62 |=============================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: SET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 420795.38 |================================================================ B . 413611.92 |=============================================================== C . 407951.21 |============================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 5.347697 |============================================================= B . 5.444320 |============================================================== C . 5.693610 |================================================================= D . 5.529913 |=============================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 3.972197 |=============================================================== B . 4.058212 |================================================================ C . 3.626281 |========================================================= D . 4.117754 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 2.740116 |================================================================= B . 2.516886 |============================================================ C . 2.749481 |================================================================= D . 2.549382 |============================================================ Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 5.867582 |================================================================ B . 5.958793 |================================================================= C . 5.904912 |================================================================ D . 5.606738 |============================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 5.241602 |============================================================== B . 5.298634 |=============================================================== C . 5.477304 |================================================================= D . 5.239098 |============================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 4.349925 |================================================================ B . 4.200232 |============================================================== C . 4.420731 |================================================================= D . 4.353245 |================================================================ Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 2.998383 |================================================================= B . 2.885121 |=============================================================== C . 2.962791 |================================================================ D . 2.926717 |=============================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 5.402926 |============================================================= B . 5.720991 |================================================================= C . 5.490929 |============================================================== D . 5.107798 |========================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1274703.08 |=============================================================== B . 1245795.38 |============================================================= C . 1274214.00 |============================================================== D . 1284861.88 |=============================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 1263299.08 |============================================================= B . 1242081.75 |============================================================ C . 1296186.62 |=============================================================== D . 1231088.00 |============================================================ BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better A . 5.23 |==================================================================== B . 5.26 |===================================================================== C . 5.29 |===================================================================== D . 5.26 |===================================================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.2 Input: Fayalite-FIST Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 479.30 |=================================================================== B . 480.97 |=================================================================== C . 477.58 |=================================================================== D . 480.14 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 7.409 |=================================================================== B . 7.484 |==================================================================== C . 7.482 |==================================================================== D . 7.320 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 11.02 |=================================================================== B . 11.12 |=================================================================== C . 11.10 |=================================================================== D . 11.23 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 13.13 |================================================================== B . 13.36 |==================================================================== C . 13.23 |=================================================================== D . 13.45 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 17.13 |=================================================================== B . 17.38 |==================================================================== C . 17.06 |=================================================================== D . 17.35 |==================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 43.95 |==================================================================== B . 43.54 |=================================================================== C . 43.49 |=================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 119.15 |=================================================================== B . 118.66 |=================================================================== C . 118.65 |=================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 58.93 |==================================================================== B . 59.36 |==================================================================== C . 59.11 |==================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 177.25 |=================================================================== B . 176.80 |=================================================================== C . 176.70 |=================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 136.11 |=================================================================== B . 136.00 |=================================================================== C . 135.87 |=================================================================== RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 73.69 |=================================================================== B . 74.49 |==================================================================== C . 74.87 |==================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 64.93 |==================================================================== B . 65.04 |==================================================================== C . 64.36 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.003 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |==================================================================== C . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.019 |==================================================================== B . 0.019 |==================================================================== C . 0.019 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.083 |================================================================== B . 0.079 |============================================================== C . 0.086 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.009 |==================================================================== B . 0.009 |==================================================================== C . 0.009 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.157 |=================================================================== B . 0.158 |==================================================================== C . 0.159 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.028 |==================================================================== B . 0.028 |==================================================================== C . 0.028 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.625 |================================================================= B . 0.642 |=================================================================== C . 0.655 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |==================================================================== B . 0.016 |==================================================================== C . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.007 |==================================================================== B . 0.007 |==================================================================== C . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.013 |==================================================================== B . 0.013 |==================================================================== C . 0.012 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.028 |==================================================================== B . 0.028 |==================================================================== C . 0.028 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.019 |==================================================================== B . 0.019 |==================================================================== C . 0.019 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.015 |==================================================================== B . 0.015 |==================================================================== C . 0.015 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.061 |==================================================================== B . 0.059 |================================================================== C . 0.061 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.052 |==================================================================== B . 0.050 |================================================================= C . 0.050 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.118 |==================================================================== B . 0.117 |=================================================================== C . 0.117 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.019 |==================================================================== B . 0.019 |==================================================================== C . 0.019 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.071 |==================================================================== B . 0.068 |================================================================= C . 0.070 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.061 |==================================================================== B . 0.061 |==================================================================== C . 0.061 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.272 |================================================================== B . 0.278 |==================================================================== C . 0.280 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.244 |==================================================================== B . 0.239 |=================================================================== C . 0.244 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.162 |=================================================================== B . 1.174 |==================================================================== C . 1.182 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.226 |==================================================================== B . 0.227 |==================================================================== C . 0.223 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.542 |==================================================================== B . 0.538 |=================================================================== C . 0.540 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.149 |==================================================================== B . 1.138 |=================================================================== C . 1.142 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.213 |=================================================================== B . 2.246 |==================================================================== C . 2.239 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |====================================================== C . 0.004 |====================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |==================================================================== B . 0.016 |==================================================================== C . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.076 |================================================================== B . 0.075 |================================================================= C . 0.078 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.332 |==================================================================== B . 0.332 |==================================================================== C . 0.330 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.306 |=================================================================== B . 0.309 |==================================================================== C . 0.310 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.377 |==================================================================== B . 1.354 |=================================================================== C . 1.370 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.066 |==================================================================== B . 0.065 |=================================================================== C . 0.065 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.021 |============================================================ B . 0.024 |==================================================================== C . 0.021 |============================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.329 |=================================================================== B . 0.331 |==================================================================== C . 0.332 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.088 |================================================================= B . 0.092 |==================================================================== C . 0.088 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.433 |================================================================= B . 1.438 |================================================================= C . 1.505 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |================================== B . 0.003 |=================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.006 |================================== B . 0.012 |==================================================================== C . 0.011 |============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.028 |==================================================================== B . 0.028 |==================================================================== C . 0.028 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.127 |================================================================== B . 0.129 |=================================================================== C . 0.130 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better