3970X nov, "BLAKE2 20170307 - ", Lower Results Are Better "A",5.26,5.17,5.26 "B", "C", "D", "Blender 2.92 - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "A",44.21,43.73,43.9 "B", "C", "Blender 2.92 - Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "A",118.94,119.24,119.28 "B", "C", "Blender 2.92 - Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "A",58.97,59,58.81 "B", "C", "Blender 2.92 - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "A",177.25,177.75,176.74 "B", "C", "Blender 2.92 - Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "A",136,136.1,136.22 "B", "C", "CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.2 - Input: Fayalite-FIST", Lower Results Are Better "A", "B", "C", "D", "dav1d 0.9.2 - Video Input: Chimera 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "A",752.9,752.96,754.11 "B", "C", "D", "dav1d 0.9.2 - Video Input: Summer Nature 4K", Higher Results Are Better "A",361.27,365.97,356.37 "B", "C", "D", "dav1d 0.9.2 - Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "A",705.97,708.36,712.93 "B", "C", "D", "dav1d 0.9.2 - Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit", Higher Results Are Better "A",585.45,583.71,583.52 "B", "C", "D", "GIMP 2.10.18 - Test: resize", Lower Results Are Better "A",7.463,7.381,7.383 "B", "C", "D", "GIMP 2.10.18 - Test: rotate", Lower Results Are Better "A",11.031,11.012,11.007 "B", "C", "D", "GIMP 2.10.18 - Test: auto-levels", Lower Results Are Better "A",13.042,13.333,13.015 "B", "C", "D", "GIMP 2.10.18 - Test: unsharp-mask", Lower Results Are Better "A",17.019,17.201,17.182 "B", "C", "D", "GnuPG 2.2.27 - 2.7GB Sample File Encryption", Lower Results Are Better "A",65.526,64.956,64.296 "B", "C", "JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 - CPU Threads: 1", Higher Results Are Better "A",57.1,57.13,57.06 "B", "C", "D", "JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 - CPU Threads: All", Higher Results Are Better "A",277.38,283.43,279.29 "B", "C", "D", "JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 - Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5", Higher Results Are Better "A",81.77,82.93,83 "B", "C", "D", "JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 - Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7", Higher Results Are Better "A",10.26,10.2,10.2 "B", "C", "D", "JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 - Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8", Higher Results Are Better "A",0.89,0.88,0.88 "B", "C", "D", "JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 - Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5", Higher Results Are Better "A",92.58,92.54,93 "B", "C", "D", "JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 - Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7", Higher Results Are Better "A",92.77,92.45,92.35 "B", "C", "D", "JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 - Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8", Higher Results Are Better "A",30.81,30.98,30.99 "B", "C", "D", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A", "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.003,0.003,0.003 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.001,0.001,0.001 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.018,0.018,0.019,0.019,0.019 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.001,0.001,0.001 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.079,0.084,0.08,0.086,0.081,0.087,0.085,0.08,0.085,0.087,0.079,0.086,0.085,0.087,0.081 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.009,0.009,0.009 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.158,0.156,0.158 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.028,0.028,0.028 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.625,0.626,0.624 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.001,0.001,0.001 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.004,0.004,0.004 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.004,0.004,0.004 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.016,0.016,0.016 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.002,0.002,0.002 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.007,0.007,0.007 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.013,0.013,0.013 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.028,0.028,0.028 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.001,0.001,0.001 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.005,0.005,0.005 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.005,0.005,0.005 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.019,0.019,0.019 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.015,0.015,0.015 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.061,0.061,0.061 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.052,0.052,0.052 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.118,0.118,0.119 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.019,0.019,0.019 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.07,0.071,0.071 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.061,0.061,0.061 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.27,0.27,0.276 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.244,0.244,0.244 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",1.159,1.164,1.163 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.226,0.227,0.226 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.54,0.542,0.543 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",1.148,1.148,1.152 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",2.227,2.19,2.221 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A", "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.005,0.005,0.005 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.002,0.002,0.002 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.016,0.016,0.016 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.076,0.077,0.076 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.333,0.332,0.331 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.301,0.309,0.309 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",1.374,1.383,1.374 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.005,0.005,0.005 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.066,0.066,0.066 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.021,0.022,0.023,0.021,0.021,0.021,0.022,0.021,0.022,0.021,0.021,0.021,0.022,0.021,0.021 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.327,0.33,0.331 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.088,0.088,0.087 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A",1.415,1.464,1.419 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.001,0.001,0.001 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A", "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.004,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.004,0.003,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.004,0.002,0.002,0.002 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A", "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.006,0.006,0.006 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A", "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.028,0.028,0.028 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A", "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State", Lower Results Are Better "A",0.125,0.128,0.128 "B", "C", "PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 - Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing", Lower Results Are Better "A", "B", "C", "RAR Compression 6.0.2 - Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR", Lower Results Are Better "A",72.565,74.105,74.413 "B", "C", "Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop", Higher Results Are Better "A",1250781.75,1296512.38,1276815.12 "B", "C", "D", "Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush", Higher Results Are Better "A",1225505.88,1265342.25,1299049.12 "B", "C", "D", "Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: GET", Higher Results Are Better "A",789881.95,814744.62,794819.47 "B", "C", "D", "Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: MIX", Higher Results Are Better "A",636226.17,564743.35,557956.53,559140.59,554592.58,567556.03,563608.83,572949.81,567489.71,571223.1,573004.66,570623.37 "B", "C", "D", "Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark - Test: SET", Higher Results Are Better "A",429976.54,420269.97,412139.64 "B", "C", "Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 - Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512", Higher Results Are Better "A",5.52237,4.829333,4.873896,5.331249,4.791919,5.316629,5.400595,5.410907,5.382906,5.44512,5.588301,5.615747,5.688268,5.433314,5.584898 "B", "C", "D", "Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 - Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512", Higher Results Are Better "A",3.496752,3.983074,4.112207,4.099164,3.87477,3.578285,4.035667,3.873223,4.065276,4.12825,4.098882,4.062479,4.020156,4.064715,4.090062 "B", "C", "D", "Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 - Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 512", Higher Results Are Better "A",2.737378,2.747552,2.735417 "B", "C", "D", "Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 - Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 1024", Higher Results Are Better "A",5.734983,5.94338,5.924382 "B", "C", "D", "Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 - Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512", Higher Results Are Better "A",5.31569,5.216396,4.588124,5.45881,5.285779,5.22434,4.866924,5.430174,5.202543,5.49575,5.150159,5.469315,5.212195,5.294119,5.413712 "B", "C", "D", "Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 - Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 1024", Higher Results Are Better "A",4.358276,4.276318,4.415181 "B", "C", "D", "Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 - Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 1024", Higher Results Are Better "A",2.983736,3.004923,3.006489 "B", "C", "D", "Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 - Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024", Higher Results Are Better "A",5.134754,5.769322,5.23401,5.730997,5.171429,5.729273,5.313108,5.579887,5.730691,5.323883,4.112475,5.48351,5.510192,5.586034,5.634319 "B", "C", "D",