10980XE Nov Intel Core i9-10980XE testing with a ASRock X299 Steel Legend (P1.30 BIOS) and NVIDIA NV132 11GB on Clear Linux OS 35150 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 4.80GHz (18 Cores / 36 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock X299 Steel Legend (P1.30 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB, Graphics: NVIDIA NV132 11GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I219-V + Intel I211 OS: Clear Linux OS 35150, Kernel: 5.14.13-1083.native (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 41.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 21.2.4, Compiler: GCC 11.2.1 20211015 releases/gcc-11.2.0-353-g6a936be4ad + Clang 11.1.0 + LLVM 11.1.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1600 B: Processor: Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 4.80GHz (18 Cores / 36 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock X299 Steel Legend (P1.30 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB, Graphics: NVIDIA NV132 11GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I219-V + Intel I211 OS: Clear Linux OS 35150, Kernel: 5.14.13-1083.native (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 41.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 21.2.4, Compiler: GCC 11.2.1 20211015 releases/gcc-11.2.0-353-g6a936be4ad + Clang 11.1.0 + LLVM 11.1.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1600 C: Processor: Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 4.80GHz (18 Cores / 36 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock X299 Steel Legend (P1.30 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB, Graphics: NVIDIA NV132 11GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I219-V + Intel I211 OS: Clear Linux OS 35150, Kernel: 5.14.13-1083.native (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 41.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 21.2.4, Compiler: GCC 11.2.1 20211015 releases/gcc-11.2.0-353-g6a936be4ad + Clang 11.1.0 + LLVM 11.1.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1600 D: Processor: Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 4.80GHz (18 Cores / 36 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock X299 Steel Legend (P1.30 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB, Graphics: NVIDIA NV132 11GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I219-V + Intel I211 OS: Clear Linux OS 35150, Kernel: 5.14.13-1083.native (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 41.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 21.2.4, Compiler: GCC 11.2.1 20211015 releases/gcc-11.2.0-353-g6a936be4ad + Clang 11.1.0 + LLVM 11.1.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1600 E: Processor: Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 4.80GHz (18 Cores / 36 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock X299 Steel Legend (P1.30 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB, Graphics: NVIDIA NV132 11GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I219-V + Intel I211 OS: Clear Linux OS 35150, Kernel: 5.14.13-1083.native (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 41.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 21.2.4, Compiler: GCC 11.2.1 20211015 releases/gcc-11.2.0-353-g6a936be4ad + Clang 11.1.0 + LLVM 11.1.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1600 BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better A . 3.74 |===================================================================== B . 3.74 |===================================================================== C . 3.74 |===================================================================== D . 3.75 |===================================================================== E . 3.74 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 70.32 |=================================================================== B . 71.55 |==================================================================== C . 71.47 |==================================================================== D . 71.70 |==================================================================== E . 71.66 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 10.48 |==================================================================== B . 10.49 |==================================================================== C . 10.51 |==================================================================== D . 10.53 |==================================================================== E . 10.51 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.91 |===================================================================== B . 0.91 |===================================================================== C . 0.91 |===================================================================== D . 0.91 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 112.51 |=================================================================== B . 112.40 |=================================================================== C . 111.89 |================================================================== D . 113.07 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 112.17 |=================================================================== B . 111.97 |=================================================================== C . 111.62 |=================================================================== D . 111.97 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 34.05 |==================================================================== B . 34.16 |==================================================================== C . 34.10 |==================================================================== D . 34.22 |==================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 63.36 |==================================================================== B . 63.52 |==================================================================== C . 63.04 |=================================================================== D . 63.08 |==================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 217.81 |================================================================== B . 220.73 |=================================================================== C . 221.50 |=================================================================== D . 218.35 |================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.399 |=================================================================== B . 0.402 |==================================================================== C . 0.402 |==================================================================== D . 0.401 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2.123 |==================================================================== B . 2.109 |==================================================================== C . 2.105 |=================================================================== D . 2.091 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2.825 |=================================================================== B . 2.841 |==================================================================== C . 2.846 |==================================================================== D . 2.859 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.423 |=================================================================== B . 7.502 |==================================================================== C . 7.359 |=================================================================== D . 7.407 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 787 |====================================================================== B . 790 |====================================================================== C . 573 |=================================================== D . 790 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 206 |===================================================================== B . 203 |==================================================================== C . 207 |====================================================================== D . 208 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 19705 |==================================================================== B . 17026 |=========================================================== C . 16931 |========================================================== D . 16951 |========================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better A . 10487 |==================================================================== B . 6464 |========================================== C . 6456 |========================================== D . 7970 |==================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.017 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.037 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.01 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.158 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.035 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.687 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.018 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.008 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.022 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.035 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.026 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.014 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.066 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.104 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.138 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.018 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.101 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.059 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.284 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.235 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.175 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.389 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.624 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.946 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.736 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.073 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.467 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.293 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.98 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better