new-nov 2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core testing with a ASRockRack ROME2D16-2T (P3.10 BIOS) and ASPEED on Fedora Linux 35 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core @ 2.95GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack ROME2D16-2T (P3.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T OS: Fedora Linux 35, Kernel: 5.14.14-300.fc35.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.2.1 20210728, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 AA: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core @ 2.95GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack ROME2D16-2T (P3.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T OS: Fedora Linux 35, Kernel: 5.14.14-300.fc35.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.2.1 20210728, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core @ 2.95GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack ROME2D16-2T (P3.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T OS: Fedora Linux 35, Kernel: 5.14.14-300.fc35.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.2.1 20210728, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core @ 2.95GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack ROME2D16-2T (P3.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T OS: Fedora Linux 35, Kernel: 5.14.14-300.fc35.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.2.1 20210728, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A .. 65.72 |================================================================ AA . 68.83 |=================================================================== B .. 66.61 |================================================================= C .. 68.91 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A .. 9.39 |==================================================================== AA . 9.35 |==================================================================== B .. 9.26 |=================================================================== C .. 9.38 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A .. 0.96 |=================================================================== AA . 0.97 |==================================================================== B .. 0.96 |=================================================================== C .. 0.96 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A .. 71.26 |================================================================== AA . 70.95 |================================================================== B .. 72.29 |=================================================================== C .. 72.52 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A .. 70.82 |================================================================= AA . 71.07 |================================================================== B .. 72.49 |=================================================================== C .. 72.67 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A .. 27.78 |================================================================== AA . 27.89 |================================================================== B .. 28.33 |=================================================================== C .. 27.90 |================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better A .. 58.09 |=================================================================== AA . 57.62 |================================================================== B .. 54.64 |=============================================================== C .. 57.56 |================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better A .. 244.63 |================================================================= AA . 249.45 |================================================================== B .. 242.85 |================================================================ C .. 249.44 |================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 0.501 |=================================================================== AA . 0.502 |=================================================================== B .. 0.503 |=================================================================== C .. 0.503 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 2.161 |=============================================================== AA . 2.277 |================================================================== B .. 2.163 |=============================================================== C .. 2.295 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 2.972 |================================================================== AA . 2.921 |================================================================= B .. 3.030 |=================================================================== C .. 2.953 |================================================================= rav1e 0.5 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A .. 6.427 |================================================================= AA . 6.471 |================================================================= B .. 6.627 |=================================================================== C .. 6.428 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 5.636240 |================================================================ B . 5.735381 |================================================================= C . 5.691988 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 3.918886 |================================================================= B . 3.860799 |================================================================ C . 3.936974 |================================================================= Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AA . 1215874.48 |============================================================== B .. 1169533.50 |============================================================ C .. 1212665.19 |============================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better AA . 1182263.54 |============================================== B .. 1583531.25 |============================================================== C .. 1201923.12 |=============================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: GET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better AA . 737589.42 |=========================================================== B .. 745562.90 |============================================================ C .. 782383.89 |=============================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: MIX Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better AA . 434753.04 |===================================================== B .. 515974.69 |=============================================================== C .. 478538.61 |========================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: SET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better AA . 300716.94 |======================================================== B .. 336661.24 |=============================================================== C .. 324048.37 |============================================================= Blender 2.92 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 26.28 |=================================================================== B .. 26.33 |=================================================================== C .. 26.45 |=================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 64.16 |=================================================================== B .. 64.64 |=================================================================== C .. 63.83 |================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 37.85 |=================================================================== B .. 37.54 |================================================================== C .. 37.65 |=================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 96.89 |=================================================================== B .. 96.89 |=================================================================== C .. 97.40 |=================================================================== Blender 2.92 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 76.88 |=================================================================== B .. 76.88 |=================================================================== C .. 77.08 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better AA . 252 |=============================================================== B .. 278 |===================================================================== C .. 272 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better AA . 166 |========================================================== B .. 159 |======================================================= C .. 198 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better AA . 4560 |===================================== B .. 7976 |================================================================ C .. 8430 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better AA . 4913 |========================================== B .. 4721 |======================================== C .. 7945 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 0.002 |=================================================================== B .. 0.002 |=================================================================== C .. 0.002 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 0.009 |=================================================================== B .. 0.009 |=================================================================== C .. 0.009 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 0.011 |============================================================= B .. 0.012 |=================================================================== C .. 0.011 |============================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 0.034 |=================================================================== B .. 0.033 |================================================================= C .. 0.033 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 0.046 |=================================================================== B .. 0.045 |================================================================== C .. 0.044 |================================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 0.120 |=================================================================== B .. 0.118 |================================================================== C .. 0.119 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 0.170 |=================================================================== B .. 0.167 |================================================================== C .. 0.165 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 0.486 |=================================================================== B .. 0.485 |=================================================================== C .. 0.482 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 1.025 |=================================================================== B .. 1.021 |=================================================================== C .. 1.012 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better AA . 2.029 |=================================================================== B .. 2.021 |=================================================================== C .. 2.024 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better