5700G November Tests for a future article. AMD Ryzen 7 5700G testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (2423 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 21.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 5700G (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (2423 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Renoir Root Complex, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: AMD Device 1637, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.14.0-rc7-amd-pstate-phx (x86_64) 20210909, Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 21.3.0-devel (git-9ca7412 2021-08-26 impish-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 12.0.1 256 bits), Vulkan: 1.1.185, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 5700G (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (2423 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Renoir Root Complex, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: AMD Device 1637, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.14.0-rc7-amd-pstate-phx (x86_64) 20210909, Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.11, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 21.3.0-devel (git-9ca7412 2021-08-26 impish-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 12.0.1 256 bits), Vulkan: 1.1.185, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1637.4 |================================================================= 2 . 1695.6 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3915.8 |================================================================== 2 . 3980.7 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 252.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 255.7 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4072.7 |================================================================== 2 . 4115.4 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 27.9 |===================================================================== 2 . 27.6 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3658.8 |=================================================================== 2 . 3635.1 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 384.0 |==================================================================== 2 . 380.3 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4123.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 4076.2 |================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 314.6 |==================================================================== 2 . 310.6 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4248.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 4265.6 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 24.0 |===================================================================== 2 . 23.8 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3712.1 |=================================================================== 2 . 3639.3 |================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.13 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.13 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.83 |=================================================================== 2 . 3.93 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 9.25 |==================================================================== 2 . 9.33 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 7.56 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.69 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 34.18 |==================================================================== 2 . 33.99 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 42.26 |==================================================================== 2 . 41.91 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 44.70 |==================================================================== 2 . 44.54 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.3 |====================================================================== 2 . 0.3 |====================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.13 |===================================================================== 2 . 8.15 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.76 |===================================================================== 2 . 8.74 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 19.26 |=================================================================== 2 . 19.42 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 83.25 |==================================================================== 2 . 83.83 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 96.24 |==================================================================== 2 . 96.31 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 100.92 |=================================================================== 2 . 100.56 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 7.76 |===================================================================== 2 . 7.79 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 7.88 |===================================================================== 2 . 7.56 |================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 35.60 |==================================================================== 2 . 34.22 |================================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 36.79 |==================================================================== 2 . 35.14 |================================================================= Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 17.39 |==================================================================== 2 . 16.41 |================================================================ Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 28.97 |==================================================================== 2 . 27.09 |================================================================ Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 64.68 |==================================================================== 2 . 63.07 |================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 110.30 |=================================================================== 2 . 104.52 |=============================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.575 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.495 |=========================================================== rav1e 0.5 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.921 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.624 |============================================================= rav1e 0.5 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.996 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.499 |============================================================ rav1e 0.5 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 9.818 |==================================================================== 2 . 8.896 |============================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.631877 |================================================================= 2 . 2.776994 |================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.713712 |================================================================= 2 . 2.718576 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.878127 |================================================================= 2 . 1.864764 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.816033 |================================================================= 2 . 3.815956 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.560366 |================================================================= 2 . 3.547714 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.875211 |================================================================= 2 . 2.869667 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.999868 |================================================================= 2 . 1.991439 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.705688 |================================================================= 2 . 3.705615 |================================================================= OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2542.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 2548.1 |=================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 163671.7 |================================================================= 2 . 163662.8 |================================================================= ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.1104 |=================================================================== 2 . 4.1312 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.6002 |=================================================================== 2 . 6.6063 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 60.47 |==================================================================== 2 . 60.54 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 8.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.942 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.594 |==================================================================== 2 . 9.586 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 10.46 |==================================================================== 2 . 10.42 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.22 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 12.39 |==================================================================== 2 . 12.25 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 367 |====================================================================== 2 . 357 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 74 |======================================================================= 2 . 74 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 25425 |==================================================================== 2 . 25084 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 5040 |==================================================================== 2 . 5098 |===================================================================== RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 66.81 |==================================================================== 2 . 66.92 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.015 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.014 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.042 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.039 |=============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.012 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.011 |============================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.171 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.163 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.040 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.035 |============================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.747 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.733 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.003 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.003 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.003 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.015 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.015 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.013 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.013 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.027 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.027 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.017 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.017 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.012 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.012 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.054 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.054 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.052 |============================================================= 2 . 0.058 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.115 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.112 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.017 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.017 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.067 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.066 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.048 |================================================================= 2 . 0.050 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.252 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.245 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.194 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.193 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.049 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.030 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.252 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.255 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.541 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.538 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.296 |================================================================== 2 . 1.332 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.235 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.207 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.015 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.015 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.07 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.07 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.321 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.321 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.278 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.277 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.356 |=================================================================== 2 . 1.378 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.065 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.066 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.018 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.018 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.331 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.334 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.084 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.075 |============================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.491 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.465 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.026 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.025 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.113 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.113 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 93150 |==================================================================== 2 . 92396 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 62076 |=================================================================== 2 . 62953 |==================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 10477 |==================================================================== 2 . 7530 |=================================================