9400F October Intel Core i5-9400F testing with a MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19) v1.0 (1.10 BIOS) and MSI NVIDIA NV106 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. A: Processor: Intel Core i5-9400F @ 4.10GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19) v1.0 (1.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZVPW256HEGL-000H7, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA NV106 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: MX279, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200928-generic (x86_64) 20200927, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.2, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 B: Processor: Intel Core i5-9400F @ 4.10GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19) v1.0 (1.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZVPW256HEGL-000H7, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA NV106 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: MX279, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200928-generic (x86_64) 20200927, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.2, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 C: Processor: Intel Core i5-9400F @ 4.10GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19) v1.0 (1.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZVPW256HEGL-000H7, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA NV106 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: MX279, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200928-generic (x86_64) 20200927, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.2, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 yquake2 8.0 Renderer: Software CPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 72.3 |===================================================================== B . 72.2 |===================================================================== C . 72.4 |===================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 16184.13 |================================================================ B . 16331.65 |================================================================= C . 16352.51 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 3747.95 |================================================================== B . 3761.26 |================================================================== C . 3770.55 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 858.10 |=================================================================== B . 857.00 |=================================================================== C . 858.66 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 853.06 |=================================================================== B . 859.20 |=================================================================== C . 855.53 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 8587.22 |================================================================= B . 8621.46 |================================================================== C . 8666.86 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 17032.32 |================================================================= B . 16996.65 |================================================================= C . 17008.25 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 8131.46 |================================================================== B . 8138.68 |================================================================== C . 8137.17 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 4434.58 |================================================================== B . 4374.94 |================================================================= C . 4383.62 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better A . 4550.33 |================================================================== B . 4554.88 |================================================================== C . 4535.07 |================================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 988 |==================================================================== B . 1000 |===================================================================== C . 979 |==================================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 929 |==================================================================== B . 947 |===================================================================== C . 959 |====================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2.44 |===================================================================== B . 2.44 |===================================================================== C . 2.44 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.87 |==================================================================== B . 0.88 |===================================================================== C . 0.87 |==================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3.55 |===================================================================== B . 3.55 |===================================================================== C . 3.55 |===================================================================== simdjson 1.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3.93 |===================================================================== B . 3.95 |===================================================================== C . 3.95 |===================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better A . 1047.7 |============================================================== B . 1138.6 |=================================================================== C . 1025.2 |============================================================ Renaissance 0.12 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better A . 744.9 |=================================================================== B . 754.7 |==================================================================== C . 745.9 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: ALS Movie Lens ms < Lower Is Better A . 7143.9 |=================================================================== B . 7145.8 |=================================================================== C . 7146.1 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better A . 2926.3 |=================================================================== B . 2868.7 |================================================================== C . 2874.5 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better A . 2470.6 |======================================================== B . 2941.0 |=================================================================== C . 2477.0 |======================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better A . 10320.9 |================================================================== B . 10133.4 |================================================================= C . 9964.1 |================================================================ Renaissance 0.12 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better A . 3984.4 |================================================================== B . 4048.5 |=================================================================== C . 3524.5 |========================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Finagle HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better A . 1819.6 |================================================================= B . 1857.9 |=================================================================== C . 1871.7 |=================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better A . 4553.7 |=================================================================== B . 3972.9 |========================================================== C . 4063.0 |============================================================ Renaissance 0.12 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better A . 9966.8 |================================================================== B . 10004.6 |================================================================== C . 9995.6 |================================================================== Renaissance 0.12 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better A . 1541.9 |=================================================================== B . 1507.8 |================================================================= C . 1549.1 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 1921.1 |================================================================== B . 1940.6 |=================================================================== C . 1902.4 |================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 171.3 |==================================================================== B . 168.7 |=================================================================== C . 167.6 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3443.1 |=================================================================== B . 3434.2 |=================================================================== C . 3451.5 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 20.0 |===================================================================== B . 20.0 |===================================================================== C . 19.6 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2947.2 |=================================================================== B . 2968.2 |=================================================================== C . 2960.5 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 867.1 |================================================================ B . 918.0 |==================================================================== C . 920.1 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3569.9 |=================================================================== B . 3576.7 |=================================================================== C . 3569.9 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 189.5 |==================================================================== B . 188.8 |=================================================================== C . 190.3 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3680.1 |=================================================================== B . 3674.1 |=================================================================== C . 3661.8 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 16.3 |===================================================================== B . 16.2 |===================================================================== C . 16.3 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3017.4 |=================================================================== B . 3017.1 |=================================================================== C . 3001.0 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 1729.0 |====================================================== B . 2161.8 |=================================================================== C . 1963.4 |============================================================= Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3162.3 |=================================================================== B . 3169.0 |=================================================================== C . 3161.3 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 232.6 |==================================================================== B . 231.3 |==================================================================== C . 231.3 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3245.4 |=================================================================== B . 3233.7 |=================================================================== C . 3226.4 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 21.4 |===================================================================== B . 21.4 |===================================================================== C . 21.4 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2873.6 |=================================================================== B . 2863.3 |=================================================================== C . 2877.4 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 328.1 |==================================================================== B . 328.6 |==================================================================== C . 328.3 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3393.8 |=================================================================== B . 3389.4 |=================================================================== C . 3388.4 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 238.1 |=================================================================== B . 240.0 |=================================================================== C . 242.7 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 3478.6 |=================================================================== B . 3461.2 |=================================================================== C . 3473.3 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 12.6 |==================================================================== B . 12.7 |===================================================================== C . 12.7 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better A . 2999.5 |=================================================================== B . 2993.6 |=================================================================== C . 2999.3 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 28.23 |==================================================================== B . 28.20 |==================================================================== C . 28.01 |=================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 7.18 |===================================================================== B . 7.16 |===================================================================== C . 7.17 |===================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 0.69 |===================================================================== B . 0.69 |===================================================================== C . 0.68 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 62.84 |================================================================= B . 65.79 |==================================================================== C . 63.05 |================================================================= JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 62.95 |==================================================================== B . 62.79 |==================================================================== C . 62.61 |==================================================================== JPEG XL libjxl 0.5 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 24.41 |==================================================================== B . 24.45 |==================================================================== C . 24.47 |==================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 48.34 |==================================================================== B . 48.56 |==================================================================== C . 48.47 |==================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.5 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better A . 198.24 |=================================================================== B . 198.81 |=================================================================== C . 197.63 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 374.11 |=================================================================== B . 374.86 |=================================================================== C . 373.38 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better A . 103.50 |=================================================================== B . 103.16 |=================================================================== C . 103.22 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better A . 358.46 |=================================================================== B . 358.00 |=================================================================== C . 359.46 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.9.2 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better A . 284.68 |=================================================================== B . 284.86 |=================================================================== C . 284.69 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.07 |===================================================================== B . 0.07 |===================================================================== C . 0.07 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 2.56 |===================================================================== B . 2.55 |===================================================================== C . 2.56 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 7.65 |===================================================================== B . 7.62 |===================================================================== C . 7.64 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 5.27 |===================================================================== B . 5.25 |===================================================================== C . 5.25 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 25.65 |==================================================================== B . 25.76 |==================================================================== C . 25.45 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 35.19 |==================================================================== B . 35.31 |==================================================================== C . 35.27 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 38.52 |==================================================================== B . 38.41 |==================================================================== C . 38.11 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 0.18 |===================================================================== B . 0.18 |===================================================================== C . 0.17 |================================================================= AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 6.14 |===================================================================== B . 6.13 |===================================================================== C . 6.15 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 6.92 |===================================================================== B . 6.92 |===================================================================== C . 6.92 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 16.01 |==================================================================== B . 15.97 |==================================================================== C . 16.02 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 86.09 |==================================================================== B . 85.92 |==================================================================== C . 85.78 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 106.80 |=================================================================== B . 106.59 |=================================================================== C . 106.61 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 115.67 |=================================================================== B . 115.01 |=================================================================== C . 115.48 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3.89 |===================================================================== B . 3.88 |===================================================================== C . 3.88 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3.97 |===================================================================== B . 3.96 |===================================================================== C . 3.96 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 20.80 |==================================================================== B . 20.72 |==================================================================== C . 20.73 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 21.39 |==================================================================== B . 21.28 |==================================================================== C . 21.31 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 9.26 |===================================================================== B . 9.26 |===================================================================== C . 9.26 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 16.08 |==================================================================== B . 16.10 |==================================================================== C . 16.05 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 43.24 |==================================================================== B . 43.16 |==================================================================== C . 43.15 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 71.59 |=================================================================== B . 72.24 |==================================================================== C . 72.29 |==================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 3.81 |===================================================================== B . 3.83 |===================================================================== C . 3.83 |===================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 9.38 |===================================================================== B . 9.43 |===================================================================== C . 9.39 |===================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 0 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 8.78 |==================================================================== B . 8.89 |===================================================================== C . 8.80 |==================================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.10.0 Speed: Speed 5 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better A . 24.94 |==================================================================== B . 24.75 |=================================================================== C . 24.80 |==================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 0.25 |===================================================================== B . 0.25 |===================================================================== C . 0.25 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 0.26 |===================================================================== B . 0.26 |===================================================================== C . 0.26 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 Images / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 0.12 |===================================================================== B . 0.12 |===================================================================== C . 0.12 |===================================================================== OpenVKL 1.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC Items / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 36 |======================================================================= B . 36 |======================================================================= C . 36 |======================================================================= OpenVKL 1.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar Items / Sec > Higher Is Better A . 15 |======================================================================= B . 15 |======================================================================= C . 15 |======================================================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 103.56 |=================================================================== B . 103.58 |=================================================================== C . 103.76 |=================================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1615.98 |================================================================== B . 1617.40 |================================================================== C . 1612.53 |================================================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 107.19 |=================================================================== B . 107.04 |=================================================================== C . 107.25 |=================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 182.25 |================================================================== B . 181.73 |================================================================== C . 183.65 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1396.14 |================================================================== B . 1395.47 |================================================================== C . 1395.53 |================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1423.85 |================================================================== B . 1427.83 |================================================================== C . 1424.42 |================================================================== YafaRay 3.5.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 272.68 |=================================================================== B . 271.13 |=================================================================== C . 272.81 |=================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 17.16 |==================================================================== B . 17.23 |==================================================================== C . 17.16 |==================================================================== Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 169.53 |=================================================================== B . 169.14 |=================================================================== C . 169.47 |=================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better A . 642.10 |=================================================================== B . 642.97 |=================================================================== C . 642.74 |=================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better A . 1987776350 |=============================================================== B . 1987250990 |=============================================================== C . 1987035700 |=============================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 1717.4 |=================================================================== B . 1724.7 |=================================================================== C . 1726.0 |=================================================================== OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 111296.3 |================================================================= B . 110665.5 |================================================================ C . 111622.7 |================================================================= OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better A . 1719.2 |=================================================================== B . 1724.1 |=================================================================== C . 1721.6 |=================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better A . 110708.1 |================================================================= B . 110480.3 |================================================================= C . 110942.8 |================================================================= GROMACS 2021.2 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better A . 0.644 |=================================================================== B . 0.639 |=================================================================== C . 0.649 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 6.1804 |=================================================================== B . 6.2073 |=================================================================== C . 6.1995 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 12.53 |==================================================================== B . 12.53 |==================================================================== C . 12.53 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 113.84 |=================================================================== B . 113.73 |=================================================================== C . 114.05 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 31.01 |==================================================================== B . 31.01 |==================================================================== C . 30.95 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 120.16 |================================================================= B . 123.44 |=================================================================== C . 120.68 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 248.35 |=================================================================== B . 249.50 |=================================================================== C . 249.98 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 202757.89 |======================================================== B . 233208.18 |================================================================ C . 200982.67 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 1296.83 |================================================================== B . 1292.79 |================================================================== C . 1300.65 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 27213553.35 |============================================================== B . 27205992.56 |============================================================== C . 27131822.21 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 194730.10 |================================================================ B . 194727.48 |================================================================ C . 194256.24 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 27572.22 |================================================================= B . 27396.45 |================================================================= C . 27260.39 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: IO_uring Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 63629.54 |================================================================= B . 63330.79 |================================================================= C . 62992.59 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 125.16 |=================================================================== B . 119.93 |================================================================ C . 123.73 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 8515.03 |================================================================== B . 8528.86 |================================================================== C . 8527.62 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 365066.58 |================================================================ B . 350712.12 |============================================================= C . 358535.58 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 21914.04 |================================================================ B . 22221.93 |================================================================= C . 22193.07 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 13584.33 |================================================================= B . 13583.80 |================================================================= C . 13584.39 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 1947.08 |================================================================== B . 1859.07 |=============================================================== C . 1907.81 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 5153.86 |================================================================== B . 5089.21 |================================================================= C . 4835.57 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 1777885.37 |============================================================== B . 1820884.11 |=============================================================== C . 1774489.75 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 720691.36 |================================================================ B . 714431.14 |=============================================================== C . 685826.50 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 83.83 |==================================================================== B . 83.97 |==================================================================== C . 83.30 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better A . 3170404.51 |============================================================== B . 3233168.98 |=============================================================== C . 3244151.39 |=============================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: mobilenetV3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.612 |=================================================================== B . 1.595 |=================================================================== C . 1.624 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: squeezenetv1.1 ms < Lower Is Better A . 2.917 |==================================================================== B . 2.913 |==================================================================== C . 2.915 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better A . 26.85 |==================================================================== B . 26.78 |==================================================================== C . 26.78 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.621 |==================================================================== B . 4.587 |=================================================================== C . 4.597 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better A . 3.057 |==================================================================== B . 3.039 |==================================================================== C . 3.052 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 3.465 |==================================================================== B . 3.456 |==================================================================== C . 3.478 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.2 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 29.24 |==================================================================== B . 29.03 |==================================================================== C . 29.01 |=================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better A . 20.87 |==================================================================== B . 20.89 |==================================================================== C . 20.88 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 5.51 |==================================================================== B . 5.60 |===================================================================== C . 5.52 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.50 |==================================================================== B . 4.58 |===================================================================== C . 4.49 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.02 |===================================================================== B . 3.98 |==================================================================== C . 3.91 |=================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 4.29 |===================================================================== B . 4.21 |==================================================================== C . 4.22 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better A . 7.42 |===================================================================== B . 7.43 |===================================================================== C . 7.42 |===================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better A . 1.45 |===================================================================== B . 1.45 |===================================================================== C . 1.45 |===================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better A . 18.06 |==================================================================== B . 18.13 |==================================================================== C . 18.01 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better A . 80.03 |==================================================================== B . 80.34 |==================================================================== C . 80.30 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better A . 19.40 |==================================================================== B . 19.37 |==================================================================== C . 19.36 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better A . 15.35 |==================================================================== B . 15.36 |==================================================================== C . 15.38 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better A . 34.38 |==================================================================== B . 34.39 |==================================================================== C . 34.39 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better A . 32.71 |==================================================================== B . 32.75 |==================================================================== C . 32.85 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better A . 29.46 |==================================================================== B . 29.48 |==================================================================== C . 29.45 |==================================================================== NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better A . 8.74 |===================================================================== B . 8.75 |===================================================================== C . 8.78 |===================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: DenseNet ms < Lower Is Better A . 4233.43 |================================================================== B . 4244.71 |================================================================== C . 4257.83 |================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 409.36 |=================================================================== B . 410.38 |=================================================================== C . 411.13 |=================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better A . 88.87 |==================================================================== B . 88.84 |==================================================================== C . 88.82 |==================================================================== TNN 0.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better A . 379.35 |=================================================================== B . 379.11 |=================================================================== C . 378.21 |=================================================================== nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.21.1 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Natron 2.4 Input: Spaceship FPS > Higher Is Better A . 1.4 |====================================================================== B . 1.4 |====================================================================== C . 1.2 |============================================================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 61.35 |==================================================================== B . 61.22 |==================================================================== C . 60.99 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.003 |=================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |============================================================ B . 0.017 |================================================================ C . 0.018 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.050 |==================================================================== B . 0.049 |=================================================================== C . 0.049 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.012 |==================================================================== B . 0.012 |==================================================================== C . 0.012 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.213 |==================================================================== B . 0.214 |==================================================================== C . 0.213 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.052 |=================================================================== B . 0.052 |=================================================================== C . 0.053 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.039 |==================================================================== B . 1.035 |=================================================================== C . 1.043 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.005 |==================================================================== B . 0.005 |==================================================================== C . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.022 |==================================================================== B . 0.022 |==================================================================== C . 0.022 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.004 |==================================================================== B . 0.004 |==================================================================== C . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.008 |============================================================ B . 0.009 |==================================================================== C . 0.009 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.019 |==================================================================== B . 0.019 |==================================================================== C . 0.019 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.036 |================================================================== B . 0.037 |==================================================================== C . 0.037 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.007 |==================================================================== B . 0.007 |==================================================================== C . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.006 |==================================================================== B . 0.006 |==================================================================== C . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.027 |==================================================================== B . 0.027 |==================================================================== C . 0.027 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.016 |==================================================================== B . 0.016 |==================================================================== C . 0.016 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.083 |==================================================================== B . 0.082 |=================================================================== C . 0.082 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.077 |==================================================================== B . 0.076 |=================================================================== C . 0.076 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.147 |==================================================================== B . 0.147 |==================================================================== C . 0.146 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.021 |================================================================= B . 0.022 |==================================================================== C . 0.021 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.106 |=================================================================== B . 0.105 |=================================================================== C . 0.107 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.066 |==================================================================== B . 0.064 |================================================================== C . 0.064 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.374 |================================================================== B . 0.374 |================================================================== C . 0.384 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.255 |=================================================================== B . 0.257 |==================================================================== C . 0.255 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.569 |==================================================================== B . 1.575 |==================================================================== C . 1.566 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.329 |==================================================================== B . 0.328 |==================================================================== C . 0.328 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.671 |=================================================================== B . 0.670 |=================================================================== C . 0.678 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.541 |==================================================================== B . 1.542 |==================================================================== C . 1.542 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.760 |==================================================================== B . 2.769 |==================================================================== C . 2.777 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.006 |==================================================================== B . 0.006 |==================================================================== C . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.021 |================================================================= B . 0.022 |==================================================================== C . 0.022 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.086 |================================================================== B . 0.087 |================================================================== C . 0.089 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.473 |==================================================================== B . 0.473 |==================================================================== C . 0.471 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.390 |==================================================================== B . 0.351 |============================================================= C . 0.345 |============================================================ PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 2.004 |==================================================================== B . 1.995 |==================================================================== C . 2.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.006 |==================================================================== B . 0.006 |==================================================================== C . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.084 |=================================================================== B . 0.085 |==================================================================== C . 0.084 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.026 |==================================================================== B . 0.026 |==================================================================== C . 0.026 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.427 |=================================================================== B . 0.432 |==================================================================== C . 0.434 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.107 |=================================================================== B . 0.109 |==================================================================== C . 0.106 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 1.921 |==================================================================== B . 1.888 |=================================================================== C . 1.914 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.001 |==================================================================== B . 0.001 |==================================================================== C . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.002 |==================================================================== B . 0.002 |==================================================================== C . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.008 |==================================================================== B . 0.008 |==================================================================== C . 0.008 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.032 |================================================================== B . 0.032 |================================================================== C . 0.033 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better A . 0.154 |==================================================================== B . 0.154 |==================================================================== C . 0.154 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better BRL-CAD 7.32.2 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better A . 66330 |=================================================================== B . 66947 |==================================================================== C . 65893 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better A . 176346 |================================================================= B . 177590 |================================================================== C . 180807 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better A . 48794 |==================================================================== B . 48809 |==================================================================== C . 48816 |==================================================================== OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better A . 13040 |=================================================================== B . 8985 |============================================== C . 13149 |==================================================================== Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 1.990798 |================================================================= B . 1.985584 |================================================================= C . 1.988380 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 1.484689 |================================================================= B . 1.481488 |================================================================= C . 1.485698 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 1.014759 |================================================================= B . 1.018655 |================================================================= C . 1.014882 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 2.032955 |================================================================= B . 2.036475 |================================================================= C . 2.036697 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 1.924395 |================================================================= C . 1.935676 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 1.520647 |================================================================= C . 1.521560 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 1.049666 |================================================================= Stargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9 Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024 Render Ratio > Higher Is Better A . 1.967306 |=================================================================