y 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8360Y testing with a Supermicro X12DPU-6 v1.02 (1.1 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. nn: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8360Y @ 3.50GHz (72 Cores / 144 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X12DPU-6 v1.02 (1.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 0998, Memory: 32 x 64 GB DDR4-3200MT/s HMAA8GR7AJR4N-XN, Disk: 4001GB P34UTR-04T0H-ST + 960GB INTEL SSDSC2KG96, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2 + 2 x Intel 10G X550T OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-38-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, Vulkan: 1.0.2, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 5859 |==================================================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better nn . 11670.8 |================================================================= Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better nn . 24476.1 |================================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better nn . 8994.38 |================================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better nn . 9320.35 |================================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better nn . 9143.57 |================================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better nn . 8950.37 |================================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better nn . 8690.34 |================================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better nn . 6278.02 |================================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better nn . 6185.68 |================================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better nn . 5661.70 |================================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better nn . 5575.59 |================================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better nn . 5592.75 |================================================================= t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 33.25 |=================================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 10.42 |=================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0598 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0591 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0594 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0640 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0608 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0670 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 64 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0714 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 128 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0908 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 144 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0966 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.026 |=================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0260 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0261 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0267 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0304 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0261 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0304 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0276 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0303 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 64 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0310 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0306 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 128 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0516 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 144 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0539 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0302 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0322 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 64 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0336 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 128 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0587 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 144 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.066 |=================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0773 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0754 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0765 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0798 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0810 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0904 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 64 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.0874 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 128 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.1075 |================================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 144 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better nn . 0.1115 |================================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 100 |===================================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 1000 |==================================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 3200 |==================================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 6400 |==================================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 31998 |=================================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 39741 |=================================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 43811 |=================================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 1.05 |==================================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 50268 |=================================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 56793 |=================================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 33.6 |==================================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 67.1 |==================================================================== WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 423.84 |================================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Epoll Wait ops/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 4968 |==================================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Hash ops/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 3125207 |================================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 16.21 |=================================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memset 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 58.83 |=================================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Sched Pipe ops/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 67541 |=================================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi ops/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 38 |====================================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Syscall Basic ops/sec > Higher Is Better nn . 17233211 |================================================================ OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better nn . 14.71 |=================================================================== OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better nn . 18.71 |=================================================================== OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better nn . 85.36 |=================================================================== OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better nn . 68.17 |=================================================================== OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better nn . 94.30 |=================================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 3593814 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 3305587 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 2858235 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 2006553 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 1440787 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 976657 |================================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 2016311 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 2024961 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 1607273 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 1403124 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 1100101 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 821523 |================================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 2135237 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 2051229 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 1563529 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 1388290 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 1063911 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 817322 |================================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 1373271 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 1282563 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 1258691 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 1077888 |================================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 720012 |================================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better nn . 702241 |================================================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 34.41 |=================================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 20.81 |=================================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 11.2.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 909.52 |================================================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 73.33 |=================================================================== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 17.71 |=================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 26.71 |=================================================================== Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 20.16 |=================================================================== Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 11.30 |=================================================================== Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 42.14 |=================================================================== Build2 0.13 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 64.64 |=================================================================== Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 85.69 |=================================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 3.186 |=================================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 5.240 |=================================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 9.722 |=================================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 17.93 |=================================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 3.161 |=================================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 32.66 |=================================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 5.437 |=================================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 9.804 |=================================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 17.90 |=================================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 33.04 |=================================================================== Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 62.80 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 16002 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.063 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 523 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 1.911 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 747486 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.067 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 1354201 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.074 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 1816366 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.138 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 580 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 86.25 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 1747797 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.286 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 12163 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.082 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 548 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 182.54 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 476 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 524.67 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 361 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 1384.07 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 458 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 2.190 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 697179 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.072 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 7404 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.137 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 1311492 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.076 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 1777176 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.141 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 8993 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 5.560 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 1689725 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.296 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 408 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 2.451 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 526637 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.095 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 4410 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.227 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 13289 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 7.525 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 15675 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 15.95 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 15844 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 31.56 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 813593 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.123 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 628213 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.400 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 7720 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 6.477 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 497654 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 1.009 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 400 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 2.501 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 347916 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.144 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 9709 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 10.30 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 11635 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 21.49 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 9003 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 55.55 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 775164 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.135 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 623106 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 0.433 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 6817 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 7.335 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 490932 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 1.147 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 8578 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 11.66 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 9412 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 26.57 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better nn . 7418 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 14.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better nn . 67.41 |=================================================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better nn . 61.28 |=================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Shared ns < Lower Is Better nn . 25.9 |==================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock ns < Lower Is Better nn . 43.8 |==================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better nn . 21.1 |==================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better nn . 26.6 |==================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquire ns < Lower Is Better nn . 20.7 |==================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amd ns < Lower Is Better nn . 48.1 |==================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutex ns < Lower Is Better nn . 16.6 |==================================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlock ns < Lower Is Better nn . 31.8 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 884.92 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 1003.49 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 4347.23 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 198403.25 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 12494.48 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 1381812907.56 |=========================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 671184.73 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 66222.23 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 1128251.42 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 9.57 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 106249.63 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 9889177.34 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 277079.90 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 230556.79 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 9289.72 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 34928.28 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 5155417.30 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 3535683.21 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 887.95 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.13.02 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better nn . 2980863.53 |============================================================== ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better nn . 164 |===================================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better nn . 228 |=====================================================================