7600k nn Intel Core i5-7600K testing with a Gigabyte Z270M-D3H-CF (F8d BIOS) and Gigabyte Intel HD 630 KBL GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i5-7600K @ 4.20GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z270M-D3H-CF (F8d BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th + Z270, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 250GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel HD 630 KBL GT2 3GB (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200928-generic (x86_64) 20200927, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i5-7600K @ 4.20GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z270M-D3H-CF (F8d BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th + Z270, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 250GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel HD 630 KBL GT2 3GB (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200928-generic (x86_64) 20200927, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i5-7600K @ 4.20GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z270M-D3H-CF (F8d BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th + Z270, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 250GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel HD 630 KBL GT2 3GB (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200928-generic (x86_64) 20200927, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 4: Processor: Intel Core i5-7600K @ 4.20GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z270M-D3H-CF (F8d BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th + Z270, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 250GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel HD 630 KBL GT2 3GB (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200928-generic (x86_64) 20200927, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1308.2 |================================================================ 2 . 1363.8 |=================================================================== 3 . 1355.3 |=================================================================== 4 . 1361.2 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2823.6 |=================================================================== 2 . 2826.3 |=================================================================== 3 . 2825.7 |=================================================================== 4 . 2822.1 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 141.1 |=============================================================== 2 . 152.0 |==================================================================== 3 . 151.4 |==================================================================== 4 . 151.3 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2890.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 2892.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 2888.9 |=================================================================== 4 . 2889.4 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 12.6 |===================================================================== 2 . 12.6 |===================================================================== 3 . 12.6 |===================================================================== 4 . 12.6 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2502.9 |================================================================== 2 . 2523.6 |=================================================================== 3 . 2519.1 |=================================================================== 4 . 2523.5 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 326.2 |==================================================================== 2 . 326.6 |==================================================================== 3 . 326.6 |==================================================================== 4 . 326.6 |==================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2924.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 2926.1 |=================================================================== 3 . 2929.6 |=================================================================== 4 . 2926.9 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 148.4 |=========================================================== 2 . 171.9 |==================================================================== 3 . 169.0 |=================================================================== 4 . 159.8 |=============================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3032.5 |=================================================================== 2 . 3031.0 |=================================================================== 3 . 3033.2 |=================================================================== 4 . 3030.0 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9.54 |==================================================================== 2 . 9.73 |===================================================================== 3 . 9.71 |===================================================================== 4 . 9.70 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2601.9 |=================================================================== 2 . 2610.8 |=================================================================== 3 . 2613.4 |=================================================================== 4 . 2611.1 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.06 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.06 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.06 |===================================================================== 4 . 0.06 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.80 |===================================================================== 2 . 1.79 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.80 |===================================================================== 4 . 1.81 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.07 |===================================================================== 2 . 5.99 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.97 |==================================================================== 4 . 5.93 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.52 |===================================================================== 2 . 3.53 |===================================================================== 3 . 3.52 |===================================================================== 4 . 3.52 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 17.34 |==================================================================== 2 . 17.14 |=================================================================== 3 . 17.10 |=================================================================== 4 . 17.20 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 19.96 |========================================================== 2 . 21.29 |============================================================= 3 . 23.58 |==================================================================== 4 . 23.28 |=================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 20.72 |============================================================ 2 . 22.18 |================================================================= 3 . 22.27 |================================================================= 4 . 23.34 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.14 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.14 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.14 |===================================================================== 4 . 0.14 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.81 |===================================================================== 2 . 4.83 |===================================================================== 3 . 4.83 |===================================================================== 4 . 4.83 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.33 |===================================================================== 2 . 6.32 |===================================================================== 3 . 6.32 |===================================================================== 4 . 6.29 |===================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 11.58 |=================================================================== 2 . 11.55 |=================================================================== 3 . 11.69 |==================================================================== 4 . 11.65 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 60.82 |==================================================================== 2 . 60.71 |==================================================================== 3 . 60.51 |==================================================================== 4 . 60.60 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 74.70 |==================================================================== 2 . 71.18 |================================================================= 3 . 74.25 |==================================================================== 4 . 74.34 |==================================================================== AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 81.14 |==================================================================== 2 . 81.44 |==================================================================== 3 . 80.59 |=================================================================== 4 . 80.74 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2120.82 |================================================================== 2 . 2126.82 |================================================================== 3 . 2122.45 |================================================================== 4 . 2123.05 |================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2142.77 |================================================================== 2 . 2153.82 |================================================================== 3 . 2149.67 |================================================================== 4 . 2150.51 |================================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 17.32 |=================================================================== 2 . 17.50 |=================================================================== 3 . 17.45 |=================================================================== 4 . 17.64 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 100.88 |=================================================================== 2 . 98.97 |================================================================== 3 . 101.10 |=================================================================== 4 . 100.87 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 118.70 |=================================================================== 2 . 118.52 |=================================================================== 3 . 118.64 |=================================================================== 4 . 119.03 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2995.42 |================================================================== 2 . 2988.70 |================================================================== 3 . 2982.50 |================================================================== 4 . 2995.89 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 780.48 |=================================================================== 2 . 781.82 |=================================================================== 3 . 778.90 |=================================================================== 4 . 783.28 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 125190 |================================================================== 2 . 125120 |================================================================== 3 . 125120 |================================================================== 4 . 127140 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 764.96 |=================================================================== 2 . 765.59 |=================================================================== 3 . 765.26 |=================================================================== 4 . 765.48 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 17030 |==================================================================== 2 . 16970 |==================================================================== 3 . 17060 |==================================================================== 4 . 17060 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5220.03 |================================================================== 2 . 5216.54 |================================================================== 3 . 5223.32 |================================================================== 4 . 5219.90 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9923.81 |================================================================== 2 . 9942.44 |================================================================== 3 . 9930.03 |================================================================== 4 . 9948.67 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 20320 |==================================================================== 2 . 20320 |==================================================================== 3 . 20320 |==================================================================== 4 . 20090 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 28340 |==================================================================== 2 . 28240 |==================================================================== 3 . 28340 |==================================================================== 4 . 28340 |==================================================================== OpenSSL sign/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1169.5 |=================================================================== 2 . 1115.3 |================================================================ 3 . 1173.0 |=================================================================== 4 . 1171.5 |=================================================================== OpenSSL verify/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 75144.4 |================================================================== 2 . 74792.2 |================================================================= 3 . 75551.0 |================================================================== 4 . 75189.2 |================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.9282 |================================================================== 2 . 6.9815 |=================================================================== 3 . 6.9855 |=================================================================== 4 . 6.9764 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 18.20 |==================================================================== 2 . 18.19 |==================================================================== 3 . 18.19 |==================================================================== 4 . 18.18 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 165.74 |=================================================================== 2 . 165.52 |=================================================================== 3 . 165.64 |=================================================================== 4 . 166.03 |=================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 11.02 |=================================================================== 2 . 11.11 |==================================================================== 3 . 11.08 |==================================================================== 4 . 11.09 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 14.21 |==================================================================== 2 . 13.25 |=============================================================== 3 . 13.30 |================================================================ 4 . 13.28 |================================================================ GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 13.98 |==================================================================== 2 . 14.00 |==================================================================== 3 . 14.01 |==================================================================== 4 . 13.96 |==================================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 16.84 |==================================================================== 2 . 16.91 |==================================================================== 3 . 16.87 |==================================================================== 4 . 16.94 |==================================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpop Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1245640.25 |=============================================================== 2 . 1187648.50 |============================================================ 3 . 1213297.75 |============================================================= 4 . 1191895.12 |============================================================ Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: LPUSH and LPOP: lpush Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1244709.88 |=============================================================== 2 . 1230920.75 |============================================================== 3 . 1232285.88 |============================================================== 4 . 1232134.00 |============================================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: GET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1078300.32 |=============================================================== 2 . 589454.69 |================================== 3 . 576878.16 |================================== 4 . 565238.67 |================================= Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: MIX Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1002474.14 |=============================================================== 2 . 578147.37 |==================================== 3 . 577054.97 |==================================== 4 . 569001.16 |==================================== Redis Memtier / Redis Benchmark Test: SET Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 691456.60 |================================================================ 2 . 639370.22 |=========================================================== 3 . 633373.49 |=========================================================== 4 . 639437.80 |=========================================================== Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 47573.10 |================================================================= 2 . 47253.83 |================================================================ 3 . 47387.86 |================================================================= 4 . 47741.69 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 36623.10 |================================================================= 2 . 36583.97 |================================================================= 3 . 36592.82 |================================================================= 4 . 36613.49 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Long Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 36336.89 |================================================================= 2 . 36424.97 |================================================================= 3 . 36445.80 |================================================================= 4 . 36403.75 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 31026.81 |================================================================= 2 . 30648.92 |================================================================ 3 . 31182.01 |================================================================= 4 . 31207.94 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 24310.85 |================================================================= 2 . 24254.65 |================================================================= 3 . 24287.07 |================================================================= 4 . 24327.81 |================================================================= Nginx Test: Short Connection - Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 23700.10 |================================================================= 2 . 23669.58 |================================================================= 3 . 23628.77 |================================================================= 4 . 23762.85 |================================================================= RAR Compression 6.0.2 Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 75.06 |==================================================================== 2 . 69.10 |============================================================== 3 . 75.28 |==================================================================== 4 . 72.97 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.023 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.022 |================================================================= 3 . 0.022 |================================================================= 4 . 0.022 |================================================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.084 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.084 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.083 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.084 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.018 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.018 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.018 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.018 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.363 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.364 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.366 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.364 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.072 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.073 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.072 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.072 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: JAX - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.596 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.600 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.600 |==================================================================== 4 . 1.603 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.004 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.004 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.021 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.021 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.021 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.021 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.005 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.005 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.009 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.009 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.009 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.009 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.024 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.024 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.024 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.024 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.041 |================================================================== 2 . 0.042 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.041 |================================================================== 4 . 0.041 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.007 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.007 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.007 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.007 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.03 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.03 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.03 |===================================================================== 4 . 0.03 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.015 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.015 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.015 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.015 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.081 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.081 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.081 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.081 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.11 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.11 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.11 |===================================================================== 4 . 0.11 |===================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.182 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.182 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.183 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.182 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.021 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.021 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.021 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.021 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.134 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.132 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.132 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.134 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.063 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.063 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.063 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.063 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.370 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.366 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.366 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.366 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.250 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.250 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.251 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.250 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.519 |=================================================================== 2 . 1.522 |=================================================================== 3 . 1.520 |=================================================================== 4 . 1.535 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.592 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.593 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.593 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.593 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.949 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.949 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.950 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.951 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.430 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.436 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.438 |==================================================================== 4 . 2.447 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.974 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.978 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.978 |==================================================================== 4 . 3.980 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.002 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.002 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.026 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.026 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.026 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.026 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.086 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.087 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.087 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.086 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.607 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.608 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.608 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.608 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.342 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.343 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.340 |================================================================== 4 . 0.348 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.522 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.511 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.507 |==================================================================== 4 . 2.508 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.005 |========================================================= 3 . 0.006 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.006 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.125 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.126 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.125 |=================================================================== 4 . 0.125 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.024 |============================================================ 2 . 0.026 |================================================================= 3 . 0.025 |=============================================================== 4 . 0.027 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.650 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.655 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.664 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.656 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.104 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.104 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.105 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.104 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: PyTorch - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.817 |=================================================================== 2 . 2.843 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.767 |================================================================== 4 . 2.795 |=================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.001 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.001 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.002 |============================================= 2 . 0.003 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.002 |============================================= 4 . 0.002 |============================================= PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.008 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.008 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.008 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.008 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.036 |================================================================== 2 . 0.037 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.037 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.036 |================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.155 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.155 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.155 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.156 |==================================================================== PyHPC Benchmarks 3.0 Device: CPU - Backend: TensorFlow - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral Mixing Seconds < Lower Is Better